Gigabyte 7NNXP (nForce2 Ultra 400): Gigabyte Goes nForce

29 Comments

View All Comments

• Anonymous User - Tuesday, July 8, 2003 - link

  Yes, uhm, can we go back to GIF? I hate Flash. Look, I'm on dialup, and I'm lagged a LOT by big downloads, but I still prefer GIFs to Flash (which seems to load a tad faster). My friends all agree, and most of them are dialuppers too. Please, at least put up a poll or something so you can see how we all really feel about this stupid Flash stuff.

• NovaPolice - Monday, July 7, 2003 - link

  It looked very good on paper but it hated every brand of ddr I had on hand. I went through a couple gigs of sticks before deciding to send it back.

• Anonymous User - Monday, July 7, 2003 - link

  I have tested both this board, and the MSI K7N2Delta. The MSI board was FAR MORE stable, and a bit (7%) faster. I wonder why in this test the Gigabyte board is compared with an EPOX via board: Just to let it outperform, which is otherwise not possible?

• Anonymous User - Monday, July 7, 2003 - link

  They say that CPU voltage is adjustable only up to 1.85v and that chipset voltage is adjustable by 5, 7.5 or 10%. I believe this to be wrong however. What the reviewer believes to be chipset voltage is actually CPU voltage also!! Check out the review over at Digital Daily and they show how voltage up to 2.035v is possible using a combination of these 2 seperate CPU voltage controls! Quite a large difference and large overlook by the reviewer.

• WooDaddy - Monday, July 7, 2003 - link

  Evan, are you or anyone at Anandtech going to discuss the differences between the Ultra 400 and the standard nForce 2 chipsets? Maybe a general review with reference boards? Is there a big performance difference or limiting factor for future upgrades?

• Anonymous User - Monday, July 7, 2003 - link

  The review does not include information on the presence of Heat Sink Mounting Holes. Suggestion, add info on mounting holes or lack of to all motherboard reveiws.

• Anonymous User - Monday, July 7, 2003 - link

  It appears that the performance test results in the Gigabyte 7NNXP review are presented in Macromedia Flash Player 6.
  
  This is unfortunate, since I am among the many web users who dislike the Flash format, and resent the numerous pop-up "ads" requesting that version 6 be installed.
  
  I regret that I will be unable to view these results, to find out what additional complexities required them to be displayed in Flash, rather than a standard, multi-platform/browser form such as GIFs. And I hope that this is not an indication that future results will be Flash-formatted, since I am a frequent AnandTech reader and will miss whatever informative content is Flashed.
  
  Thanks.

• Anonymous User - Sunday, July 6, 2003 - link

  The Anandtech review claims Gigabyte replied in 33 hours..
  
  I Wonder who in Gigabyte Should I contact ,Or what e-mail address i should mail to,
  To get a Reply in ANY time frame.
  

• CrystalBay - Sunday, July 6, 2003 - link

  Nice evaluation...However perhaps the six phase power DMS prolongs the overall life of these boards, rather than inherently more stable overclocking...Replacing a board thirteen months, two or three years down the line (If lucky) is common place...
  
  I like to see more board makers produce the bare bones 400's like Solteks NV400-64L...Why because these boards can be thrown away once a year or so...