The Athlon 64 FX-53: AMD's Next Enthusiast Part
by Derek Wilson on March 18, 2004 11:00 AM EST- Posted in
- CPUs
| Performance Test Configuration | |
| Processor(s): | AMD Athlon 64 3000+ AMD Athlon 64 3200+ AMD Athlon 64 3400+ AMD Athlon 64 FX51 AMD Athlon 64 FX53 Intel Pentium 4 3.2GHz EE Intel Pentium 4 3.4GHz EE Intel Pentium 4 3.2GHz Intel Pentium 4 3.0GHz Intel Pentium 4 2.8GHz Intel Pentium 4 3.2EGHz Intel Pentium 4 3.0EGHz Intel Pentium 4 2.8EGHz |
| RAM: | 2 x 512Mb OCZ 3500 Platinum Ltd 2 x 512Mb OCZ 3200 EL ECC Registered 2:3:3 2 x 512Mb Mushkin ECC Registered High Performance 2:3:2 |
| Hard Drive(s): | Seagate 120GB 7200 RPM (8MB Buffer) |
| Video AGP & IDE Bus Master Drivers: | VIA Hyperion 4.51 (12/02/03) Intel Chipset Drivers |
| Video Card(s): | Sapphire ATI Radeon 9800 PRO 128MB (AGP 8X) |
| Video Drivers: | ATI Catalyst 4.10 |
| Operating System(s): | Windows XP Professional SP1 |
| Motherboards: | Intel D875PBZ (Intel 875P Chipset) FIC K8-800T (VIA K8T800 Chipset) ASUS SK8V (VIA K8T800 Chipset) |
For the Athlon 64 FX-53 system, we employed the registered OCZ RAM, as there was apparently an issue with the SPD of the RAM that AMD sent us to test with, which kept it from running at higher than DDR333.
Facebook
Twitter
RSS
30 Comments
View All Comments
Guspaz - Thursday, March 18, 2004 - link
According to the test setup, they're using "ATI Catalyst 4.10"...That's 7 driver revisions in the future! There is no 4.10, the newest version is 4.3. Perhaps they mean 4.1, but nevertheless they're reporting an impossible driver revision.
msva123 - Thursday, March 18, 2004 - link
Anand, I think it is time to put your programming knowledge to use and begin work on an open source benchmark. The goals could include:1. Making the methodology of a benchmark open to the public, so that there is no question of integrity.
2. Having a frequently updated database of benchmark scores, sorted by application, so that someone could enter in the applications they use most and have a benchmark chart custom generated for their typical usage.
athlon64boy - Thursday, March 18, 2004 - link
I love AMD, I am a big fan.But you know what irritates me. Is when these sites always benchmark the processors, they rarely close with the fact that AMD is a 64-bit capable processor. AMD can whip up on an Intel, even in todays 32 bit software. They fail to mention the 64 bit future.
Someone would be dumb to go out and buy a Pentium 4. When the AThlon 64/FX line hasn't even shown its true potential .... yet.
Cybercat - Thursday, March 18, 2004 - link
GO AMD! :p So I'm a little biased, every hardware company has their fanboys. ;)CrystalBay - Thursday, March 18, 2004 - link
Drool...:)...truApostle - Thursday, March 18, 2004 - link
all your base are belong to us! Kudo's to AMD. It's about time that AMD start whooping ass on the evil~Intel camp. And although prices are high the AMD chip is still cheaper. And who even cares about price at this point. I think the purpose is to see who is extracting the most performance from their silicon. I mean shaZb0t, gimme a break already.pwn4g3
Regs - Thursday, March 18, 2004 - link
Man, when the only difference between a 3.4 EE and a 3.2EE is 3 tenths of a frame a second, you know these architectures and instruction sets reached their limit.Definitely just a bragging rights CPU. This is turning into a pissing contest.
dweigert - Thursday, March 18, 2004 - link
Ok, The Athlon FX brand is going Socket 939... But any Socket 940 board will be able to hold an Opteron 1XX processor with no problem. And guess what? These are NOT going away anytime soon. I think you do a disservice to people who chose the benefits of the platform.mcveigh - Thursday, March 18, 2004 - link
So, with a thousand dollar processor budget, what is the best chioce? Honestly, the best choice is to wait. It may seem like that's what we've said at the end of every single CPU or graphics review for the past few months, but the giant caution sign will soon be taken downWHAT YOU TEASE!!!
whats around the corner?????????????????????
WooDaddy - Thursday, March 18, 2004 - link
DEREK, DEREK, DEREK!!!Speeling errurs are awl ovur the plase!
THIS IS PITIFUL!!! SPELL CHECKER!!!
It was so annoying that I almost didn't pay attention to the results (I like the pretty pictures). You have AT LEAST one spelling error per page! If this were a newpaper, it would even get close to being published. Show us some AT pride in your articles and fix it! I know you can do better.
Try it again....