AMD Athlon 64 Performance Test Configuration
The recently introduced nForce3-250 and VIA K8T800 PRO chipsets finally bring a working PCI/AGP lock to Athlon 64. Earlier chipsets only had a working AGP/PCI lock on a handful of boards, such as the AOpen AK89 Max. Thus far, we have tested the Epox, MSI, Chaintech, and Gigabyte nF3-250 chipset motherboards and found a working AGP lock on all boards. The working AGP/PCI lock allows effective testing of Athlon 64 memory performance.All test conditions were as close as possible to those used in our earlier memory reviews.
Athlon 64 Performance Test Configuration | |
Processor(s): | AMD Athlon 64 3200+ |
RAM: | 1 x 512MB OCZ 3700EB (DS) |
Hard Drives: | Seagate 120GB IDE 7200 RPM (8MB Buffer) |
PCI/AGP Speed: | Fixed at 33/66 |
Chipset Drivers: | nVidia Platform Drivers 4.24 (May 10, 2004) |
Video Card(s): | ATI 9800 PRO 128MB, 128MB aperture, 1024x768x32 |
Video Drivers: | ATI Catalyst 4.5 |
Power Supply: | Vantec Stealth 470 Watt Aluminum |
Operating System(s): | Windows XP Professional SP1 |
Motherboards: | Chaintech VNF3-250 with Beta Bios 5/07/04 |
In our testing with nForce3-250 boards, we found that the best performance with OCZ 3700EB was achieved at a tRas setting of 10. All Performance Tests were run with a 10 setting.
Test Settings
The Athlon 64 also has the unique feature of unlocked multipliers below the rated speed, which is not available on current Pentium 4 processors. The unlocked lower ratios combined with a working AGP lock makes it possible to take a different approach to testing memory performance on the Athlon 64. The AGP/PCI lock makes it possible to look at a fixed Processor speed and variable Memory speeds to see the real impact of just higher memory speeds on typical performance.The standard Quake 3 (Open GL), Super PI (raw calculation performance), SiSoft Sandra 2004 Standard Buffered memory test (synthetic memory test), and SiSoft Sandra 2004 Standard UNBuffered memory test were run as usual. However, to test more effectively the effect of memory speed on performance, we expanded the benchmarks used for testing. UT2003 (Direct X 8) and Aquamark 3 (Direct X 9) were added to the memory tests to provide a broader range of performance measurements.
12 Comments
View All Comments
RyanVM - Wednesday, May 19, 2004 - link
What kind of performance impact does dropping the Hypertransport multiplier really have? It would be nice to see a comparision of say HT 1000Mhz @ 5x200Mhz and 4x250Mhz to see just what a difference it really makes.KillaKilla - Wednesday, May 19, 2004 - link
Why are you guys still using the 9800 Pro, as opposed to the X800 XT? Wouldn't you want the entire bottleneck to be as much on the RAM as possible?