LG GSA-4120B: High Speed Multi-format Champion
by Kristopher Kubicki on June 17, 2004 6:05 PM EST- Posted in
- Storage
Burn Tests DVD+R Media
We used a few different DVD+R discs to show write quality and speeds.MCC 003:
Here, Verbatim 8X DVD+Rs are burned and read with the GSA-4120B.Except for the few glitches in the middle, the LG looks to have burned the Verbatim disc very well. And here they are read back with the Plextor PX-712A.
This disc is readable by the PX-712A, but the final 1GB on the disc gave our Plextor 712A some problems. It could be worse, but it appears as if several other DVD+R discs perform better. Looking at Q-Check PI/PO portion of the read back, we see a spike near the end of the disc, suggesting that this is why the Plextor had trouble reading near the 4GB mark.
Pay particular notice to the CPU usage while reading some of these DVDRs. The LG GSA-4120B reads discs regularly with 10% - 20% more CPU usage than the PX-712A.
PHILIPS C08:
We used store-bought Memorex discs for this portion of the benchmark.And here, the disc is read back again by the Plextor drive.
Above, you can see the Plextor drive has no problems at all reading the disc back. In the Plextor and LG drives, this appears to be a good disc.
CMC MAG F01:
The CMC MAG discs are store-bought Imation discs.And here, the discs are again as played in the PX-712A.
All looks well for this CMC disc until we get near the end of the read. We replicated this pattern on several Imation discs burned on the LG burner. Although this disc is still readable, the drastic tail off at the end of the read is discouraging.
VDSPMSAB001:
Just to keep the benchmark well rounded, we bought some low quality Platinum DVD+Rs from Microcenter.Even the LG burner has trouble reading this disc just after burning it. Here is how that same disc performed in the PX-712A.
For whatever reason, the PX-712A calibrated itself all the way down to 2X to read this disc. This does not signal very good quality. Glancing at the Q-Check PI/PO test, we see this disc is not particularly reliable.
Below are a set of write descriptors that we could find for DVD+R media:
- RITEK R03: 8X
- MCC 002: 4X
- MCC 003: 8x
- CMC MAG F01: 8X
- PHILIPS C08: 8X
- RICOHJPNR00: 2.4X
- RICOHJPNR01: 4X
- RICOHJPNR02: 12X
- SONY D11: 8X
- VDSPMSAB001: 4X
- YUDEN000T01: 4X
- YUDEN000T02: 12X
17 Comments
View All Comments
araczynski - Friday, June 18, 2004 - link
...err, ARE?araczynski - Friday, June 18, 2004 - link
the 7 movies in my collection, IS my collection.araczynski - Friday, June 18, 2004 - link
Somebody help me out here, what am i forgetting that I can't find a single reason to actually put down even $60 on a DVD burner?Any movie I actually would want to see more then once I will buy an original of(very cheaply) somewhere on the net. I have about 7 movies in my 'collection' of movies i consider worth watching more then once.
I have no data that i consider worth wasting time on backing up (other then my bookmarks which i make multiple copies of on my multiple system drives).
Heck, I haven't had a use for my CD burner (other then being a second CDRom in my system) in almost a year.
My MP3 collection is stored on a car hd, i would admit that would suck to recreate off of the original CD's (another thing I haven't found anything worthy in in over 2 years i kid you not to buy OR rip).
What am I missing?? Am I somehow immune to the marketing machines of these companies or something?? What other uses for these burners should I be thinking of??
:)
SpaceRanger - Thursday, June 17, 2004 - link
HAHAKristopherKubicki - Thursday, June 17, 2004 - link
Nothing like the sound of wet noodle hitting pasty editor flesh....Kristopher
Bozo Galora - Thursday, June 17, 2004 - link
images worked fine herei must say that your reviews have been much more timely and pertinent as of late.
Is Anand whipping you guys with long Ramen noodles?
MAME - Thursday, June 17, 2004 - link
a few of the pics don't load