DDR2 Roundup: Reaching for 667 and Beyond
by Wesley Fink on July 8, 2004 12:09 AM EST- Posted in
- Memory
Corsair XMS2 5300C4PRO
Corsair is well known as a producer of Enthusiast memory, so it came as no surprise that Corsair is first to market with DDR2 memory rated as the next standard of PC-5300 or DDR2 667. The timing of Corsair's introduction, however, was a bit of a surprise, just two weeks after Intel's introduction of the new DDR2 technology. With the difficulty of getting DDR2 to market, DDR2 667 was not expected to appear so quickly - especially at the aggressive 4-4-4 timings rather than the JEDEC 667 timings of 5-5-5.Test DIMMs were a matched pair of XMS2 PRO with the activity LEDs.
We first saw the LEDs in our review of Corsair XMS4000 PRO and again, in the review of Corsair DDR400 2-2-2 that was recently introduced. Corsair uses the PRO designation to indicate LED activity lights on the memory.
While Corsair did not reveal the manufacturer of the memory chips used in their new XMS2 667, we suspect that the memory is based on specially binned Micron DDR2 533 chips, which were introduced about two weeks ago. The performance across the board matches very closely to Micron and Crucial DDR2 memory tested in this roundup.
Test Results: Corsair XMS2 5300C4PRO
The full suite of benchmark tests were run at all memory speeds. This includes Quake3, Super PI, Sandra 2004 SP2 Memory Tests, Aida 32 Memory Tests, and Return to Castle Wolfenstein-Enemy Territory. We also ran UT2003, Aquamark 3, and Comanche 4 at every memory speed to verify stability of the reported memory timings. All benchmarks and additional tests had to complete without incident for the memory settings to be considered stable.Corsair XMS2 5300C4PRO (DDR2 667) - 2 x 512Mb Double-Bank | |||||
Speed | Memory Timings & Voltage | Quake3 fps | Sandra UNBuffered | Sandra Standard Buffered | Super PI 2M places (time in sec) |
533DDR 800FSB |
3-3-3-10 1.85V |
371.4 | INT 3196 FLT 3232 |
INT 4944 FLT 4945 |
107 |
667DDR 1000FSB |
4-4-4-10 1.85V |
458.0 | INT 3867 FLT 3898 |
INT 6170 FLT 6148 |
86 |
686DDR 258FSB |
4-4-4-10 1.85V |
471.7 | INT 3979 FLT 4022 |
INT 6322 FLT 6305 |
83 |
Corsair XMS2 5300C4PRO (DDR2 667) | ||||
Speed | RCW-ET Radar |
Aida 32 Read |
Aida 32 Write |
Aida 32 Total |
533DDR 800FSB |
78.4 | 5451 | 2280 | 7731 |
667DDR 1000FSB |
97.5 | 6627 | 2770 | 9397 |
686DDR 258FSB |
100.3 | 6836 | 2878 | 9714 |
Since there is no motherboard support at this time for a standard DDR2 667 memory, Corsair has programmed the SPD to 4-4-4-12 timings at DDR2 533. These are actually the rated timings for DDR2 667 performance. It is clear that XMS2 667 performs significantly better than 4-4-4 at 533, performing with faster 3-3-3 timings at 1.85V with no effort at the 533 speed. Corsair easily met the DDR 667 4-4-4 specifications at DDR2 667, at the same low voltage of 1.85V.
It is not surprising that the Corsair 667 had no problem running at the highest speed that the Abit AA8 currently supports at DDR2 686. Since this was accomplished at the same 4-4-4 timings and 1.85V, it certainly is logical to expect that the XMS2 667 is capable of even higher speeds than we can currently achieve on 925X motherboards.
20 Comments
View All Comments
Wesley Fink - Thursday, July 8, 2004 - link
#9 - Actually the first number was copied incorrectly and has now been fixed. The tRas 11 line on p.3 now reads 5303-2344-7647.FlameDeer - Thursday, July 8, 2004 - link
Hi Wesley, nice article. :)Something to change:
At page 3, Micron PC2-4300U Table, Row tRAS 11,
Aida 32 Total should be "7697".
MIDIman - Thursday, July 8, 2004 - link
> When can we expect DDR2 for A64?http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?...
http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?...
mczak - Thursday, July 8, 2004 - link
Nice article, a real pity though there are no performance numbers for overclocked FSB only (i.e. FSB 258 / DDR2-"516"). There are some reasons to believe memory performance would also be quite a bit higher than with FSB200/DDR2-533...Bozo Galora - Thursday, July 8, 2004 - link
Another clear concise mem article by Prometheus.KillaKilla - Thursday, July 8, 2004 - link
When can we expect DDR2 for A64? Even thouthe they aren't so affected by lack of memory bandwidth...rjm55 - Thursday, July 8, 2004 - link
I am not usually that much into memory articles, but this is one of the best reviews I have seen on the new Intel architecture. It was surprising that even the budget DDR2 did 667. When will Intel be launching 667 as an "official" DDR2 speed?Anemone - Thursday, July 8, 2004 - link
VERY nice article - and informative on the limits that no one else is authoritatively reviewing. Thankyou and keep them coming!:)
skiboysteve - Thursday, July 8, 2004 - link
or... im blind..skiboysteve - Thursday, July 8, 2004 - link
you should mention in the benchmarks which modules are DS and SS, so people dont go ape shit over poor performance of say... GEIL..