Corsair XMS2 5300C4PRO

Corsair is well known as a producer of Enthusiast memory, so it came as no surprise that Corsair is first to market with DDR2 memory rated as the next standard of PC-5300 or DDR2 667. The timing of Corsair's introduction, however, was a bit of a surprise, just two weeks after Intel's introduction of the new DDR2 technology. With the difficulty of getting DDR2 to market, DDR2 667 was not expected to appear so quickly - especially at the aggressive 4-4-4 timings rather than the JEDEC 667 timings of 5-5-5.

Test DIMMs were a matched pair of XMS2 PRO with the activity LEDs.



We first saw the LEDs in our review of Corsair XMS4000 PRO and again, in the review of Corsair DDR400 2-2-2 that was recently introduced. Corsair uses the PRO designation to indicate LED activity lights on the memory.



While Corsair did not reveal the manufacturer of the memory chips used in their new XMS2 667, we suspect that the memory is based on specially binned Micron DDR2 533 chips, which were introduced about two weeks ago. The performance across the board matches very closely to Micron and Crucial DDR2 memory tested in this roundup.

Test Results: Corsair XMS2 5300C4PRO

The full suite of benchmark tests were run at all memory speeds. This includes Quake3, Super PI, Sandra 2004 SP2 Memory Tests, Aida 32 Memory Tests, and Return to Castle Wolfenstein-Enemy Territory. We also ran UT2003, Aquamark 3, and Comanche 4 at every memory speed to verify stability of the reported memory timings. All benchmarks and additional tests had to complete without incident for the memory settings to be considered stable.

Corsair XMS2 5300C4PRO (DDR2 667) - 2 x 512Mb Double-Bank
Speed Memory Timings & Voltage Quake3 fps Sandra UNBuffered Sandra Standard Buffered Super PI 2M places
(time in sec)
533DDR
800FSB
3-3-3-10
1.85V
371.4 INT 3196
FLT 3232
INT 4944
FLT 4945
107
667DDR
1000FSB
4-4-4-10
1.85V
458.0 INT 3867
FLT 3898
INT 6170
FLT 6148
86
686DDR
258FSB
4-4-4-10
1.85V
471.7 INT 3979
FLT 4022
INT 6322
FLT 6305
83

Corsair XMS2 5300C4PRO (DDR2 667)
Speed RCW-ET
Radar
Aida 32
Read
Aida 32
Write
Aida 32
Total
533DDR
800FSB
78.4 5451 2280 7731
667DDR
1000FSB
97.5 6627 2770 9397
686DDR
258FSB
100.3 6836 2878 9714

Since there is no motherboard support at this time for a standard DDR2 667 memory, Corsair has programmed the SPD to 4-4-4-12 timings at DDR2 533. These are actually the rated timings for DDR2 667 performance. It is clear that XMS2 667 performs significantly better than 4-4-4 at 533, performing with faster 3-3-3 timings at 1.85V with no effort at the 533 speed. Corsair easily met the DDR 667 4-4-4 specifications at DDR2 667, at the same low voltage of 1.85V.

It is not surprising that the Corsair 667 had no problem running at the highest speed that the Abit AA8 currently supports at DDR2 686. Since this was accomplished at the same 4-4-4 timings and 1.85V, it certainly is logical to expect that the XMS2 667 is capable of even higher speeds than we can currently achieve on 925X motherboards.

Benchmarks & Test Settings Crucial PC2-4300U
Comments Locked

20 Comments

View All Comments

  • Wesley Fink - Thursday, July 8, 2004 - link

    #9 - Actually the first number was copied incorrectly and has now been fixed. The tRas 11 line on p.3 now reads 5303-2344-7647.
  • FlameDeer - Thursday, July 8, 2004 - link

    Hi Wesley, nice article. :)

    Something to change:
    At page 3, Micron PC2-4300U Table, Row tRAS 11,
    Aida 32 Total should be "7697".
  • MIDIman - Thursday, July 8, 2004 - link

    > When can we expect DDR2 for A64?

    http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?...

    http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?...
  • mczak - Thursday, July 8, 2004 - link

    Nice article, a real pity though there are no performance numbers for overclocked FSB only (i.e. FSB 258 / DDR2-"516"). There are some reasons to believe memory performance would also be quite a bit higher than with FSB200/DDR2-533...
  • Bozo Galora - Thursday, July 8, 2004 - link

    Another clear concise mem article by Prometheus.
  • KillaKilla - Thursday, July 8, 2004 - link

    When can we expect DDR2 for A64? Even thouthe they aren't so affected by lack of memory bandwidth...
  • rjm55 - Thursday, July 8, 2004 - link

    I am not usually that much into memory articles, but this is one of the best reviews I have seen on the new Intel architecture. It was surprising that even the budget DDR2 did 667. When will Intel be launching 667 as an "official" DDR2 speed?
  • Anemone - Thursday, July 8, 2004 - link

    VERY nice article - and informative on the limits that no one else is authoritatively reviewing. Thankyou and keep them coming!

    :)
  • skiboysteve - Thursday, July 8, 2004 - link

    or... im blind..
  • skiboysteve - Thursday, July 8, 2004 - link

    you should mention in the benchmarks which modules are DS and SS, so people dont go ape shit over poor performance of say... GEIL..

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now