Crucial PC2-4300U

Crucial is basically the retail sales arm of Micron, one of the world's largest manufacturers of memory. The Crucial DDR2 test modules were, therefore, essentially a retail version of the same Micron engineering samples supplied with the Intel 925X/915 launch kits from Intel. This allowed verification of the performance and also gave us a very good idea of the normal variations that you might find in memory modules based on the Micron memory chips.



Test DIMMs were a matched pair of double-sided 512MB DDR2 DIMMs without heat spreaders. The Crucial PC2-4300 appeared identical to the Micron PC2-4300 that we also tested.

Not surprisingly, Micron memory chips were used in the Crucial DDR2 533 DIMMs.



These are basic production DDR2 Crucial dimms, and they are not specially binned for top performance. Crucial has also hinted that they will soon be producing an even higher performing version of DDR2 memory based on specially selected higher speed micron DDR2 chips.

Test Results: Crucial PC2-4300U

The full suite of benchmark tests were run at all memory speeds. This includes Quake3, Super PI, Sandra 2004 SP2 Memory Tests, Aida 32 Memory Tests, and Return to Castle Wolfenstein-Enemy Territory. We also ran UT2003, Aquamark 3, and Comanche 4 at every memory speed to verify stability of the reported memory timings. All benchmarks and additional tests had to complete without incident for the memory settings to be considered stable.

Crucial PC2-4300U (DDR2 533) - 2 x 512Mb Double-Bank
Speed Memory Timings & Voltage Quake3 fps Sandra UNBuffered Sandra Standard Buffered Super PI 2M places
(time in sec)
533DDR
800FSB
3-3-3-10
1.9V
372.6 INT 3185
FLT 3244
INT 4949
FLT 4952
107
667DDR
1000FSB
4-4-4-10
1.9V
459.4 INT 3766
FLT 3833
INT 6167
FLT 6158
86
686DDR
258FSB
4-4-4-10
1.9V
472.4 INT 3997
FLT 4024
INT 6315
FLT 6318
83

Crucial PC2-4300U (DDR2 533)
Speed RCW-ET
Radar
Aida 32
Read
Aida 32
Write
Aida 32
Total
533DDR
800FSB
78.6 5437 2280 7717
667DDR
1000FSB
97.5 6639 2738 9377
686DDR
258FSB
100.5 6839 2916 9755

It was no surprise that CorsairXMS2 667 performed without incident at DDR2 667 and the highest Abit AA8 setting of DDR2 686. However, it was a complete shock that basic production Crucial DDR2 533 also ran without incident at DDR2 667, at the same aggressive 4-4-4-10 timings, and at the highest speed DDR2 686 with the same timings and modest voltage settings.

Corsair XMS2 5300C4PRO Geil PC2-4300
Comments Locked

20 Comments

View All Comments

  • Wesley Fink - Thursday, July 8, 2004 - link

    #9 - Actually the first number was copied incorrectly and has now been fixed. The tRas 11 line on p.3 now reads 5303-2344-7647.
  • FlameDeer - Thursday, July 8, 2004 - link

    Hi Wesley, nice article. :)

    Something to change:
    At page 3, Micron PC2-4300U Table, Row tRAS 11,
    Aida 32 Total should be "7697".
  • MIDIman - Thursday, July 8, 2004 - link

    > When can we expect DDR2 for A64?

    http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?...

    http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?...
  • mczak - Thursday, July 8, 2004 - link

    Nice article, a real pity though there are no performance numbers for overclocked FSB only (i.e. FSB 258 / DDR2-"516"). There are some reasons to believe memory performance would also be quite a bit higher than with FSB200/DDR2-533...
  • Bozo Galora - Thursday, July 8, 2004 - link

    Another clear concise mem article by Prometheus.
  • KillaKilla - Thursday, July 8, 2004 - link

    When can we expect DDR2 for A64? Even thouthe they aren't so affected by lack of memory bandwidth...
  • rjm55 - Thursday, July 8, 2004 - link

    I am not usually that much into memory articles, but this is one of the best reviews I have seen on the new Intel architecture. It was surprising that even the budget DDR2 did 667. When will Intel be launching 667 as an "official" DDR2 speed?
  • Anemone - Thursday, July 8, 2004 - link

    VERY nice article - and informative on the limits that no one else is authoritatively reviewing. Thankyou and keep them coming!

    :)
  • skiboysteve - Thursday, July 8, 2004 - link

    or... im blind..
  • skiboysteve - Thursday, July 8, 2004 - link

    you should mention in the benchmarks which modules are DS and SS, so people dont go ape shit over poor performance of say... GEIL..

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now