DDR2 Roundup: Reaching for 667 and Beyond
by Wesley Fink on July 8, 2004 12:09 AM EST- Posted in
- Memory
Crucial PC2-4300U
Crucial is basically the retail sales arm of Micron, one of the world's largest manufacturers of memory. The Crucial DDR2 test modules were, therefore, essentially a retail version of the same Micron engineering samples supplied with the Intel 925X/915 launch kits from Intel. This allowed verification of the performance and also gave us a very good idea of the normal variations that you might find in memory modules based on the Micron memory chips.Test DIMMs were a matched pair of double-sided 512MB DDR2 DIMMs without heat spreaders. The Crucial PC2-4300 appeared identical to the Micron PC2-4300 that we also tested.
Not surprisingly, Micron memory chips were used in the Crucial DDR2 533 DIMMs.
These are basic production DDR2 Crucial dimms, and they are not specially binned for top performance. Crucial has also hinted that they will soon be producing an even higher performing version of DDR2 memory based on specially selected higher speed micron DDR2 chips.
Test Results: Crucial PC2-4300U
The full suite of benchmark tests were run at all memory speeds. This includes Quake3, Super PI, Sandra 2004 SP2 Memory Tests, Aida 32 Memory Tests, and Return to Castle Wolfenstein-Enemy Territory. We also ran UT2003, Aquamark 3, and Comanche 4 at every memory speed to verify stability of the reported memory timings. All benchmarks and additional tests had to complete without incident for the memory settings to be considered stable.Crucial PC2-4300U (DDR2 533) - 2 x 512Mb Double-Bank | |||||
Speed | Memory Timings & Voltage | Quake3 fps | Sandra UNBuffered | Sandra Standard Buffered | Super PI 2M places (time in sec) |
533DDR 800FSB |
3-3-3-10 1.9V |
372.6 | INT 3185 FLT 3244 |
INT 4949 FLT 4952 |
107 |
667DDR 1000FSB |
4-4-4-10 1.9V |
459.4 | INT 3766 FLT 3833 |
INT 6167 FLT 6158 |
86 |
686DDR 258FSB |
4-4-4-10 1.9V |
472.4 | INT 3997 FLT 4024 |
INT 6315 FLT 6318 |
83 |
Crucial PC2-4300U (DDR2 533) | ||||
Speed | RCW-ET Radar |
Aida 32 Read |
Aida 32 Write |
Aida 32 Total |
533DDR 800FSB |
78.6 | 5437 | 2280 | 7717 |
667DDR 1000FSB |
97.5 | 6639 | 2738 | 9377 |
686DDR 258FSB |
100.5 | 6839 | 2916 | 9755 |
It was no surprise that CorsairXMS2 667 performed without incident at DDR2 667 and the highest Abit AA8 setting of DDR2 686. However, it was a complete shock that basic production Crucial DDR2 533 also ran without incident at DDR2 667, at the same aggressive 4-4-4-10 timings, and at the highest speed DDR2 686 with the same timings and modest voltage settings.
20 Comments
View All Comments
Wesley Fink - Thursday, July 8, 2004 - link
#9 - Actually the first number was copied incorrectly and has now been fixed. The tRas 11 line on p.3 now reads 5303-2344-7647.FlameDeer - Thursday, July 8, 2004 - link
Hi Wesley, nice article. :)Something to change:
At page 3, Micron PC2-4300U Table, Row tRAS 11,
Aida 32 Total should be "7697".
MIDIman - Thursday, July 8, 2004 - link
> When can we expect DDR2 for A64?http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?...
http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?...
mczak - Thursday, July 8, 2004 - link
Nice article, a real pity though there are no performance numbers for overclocked FSB only (i.e. FSB 258 / DDR2-"516"). There are some reasons to believe memory performance would also be quite a bit higher than with FSB200/DDR2-533...Bozo Galora - Thursday, July 8, 2004 - link
Another clear concise mem article by Prometheus.KillaKilla - Thursday, July 8, 2004 - link
When can we expect DDR2 for A64? Even thouthe they aren't so affected by lack of memory bandwidth...rjm55 - Thursday, July 8, 2004 - link
I am not usually that much into memory articles, but this is one of the best reviews I have seen on the new Intel architecture. It was surprising that even the budget DDR2 did 667. When will Intel be launching 667 as an "official" DDR2 speed?Anemone - Thursday, July 8, 2004 - link
VERY nice article - and informative on the limits that no one else is authoritatively reviewing. Thankyou and keep them coming!:)
skiboysteve - Thursday, July 8, 2004 - link
or... im blind..skiboysteve - Thursday, July 8, 2004 - link
you should mention in the benchmarks which modules are DS and SS, so people dont go ape shit over poor performance of say... GEIL..