DDR2 Roundup: Reaching for 667 and Beyond
by Wesley Fink on July 8, 2004 12:09 AM EST- Posted in
- Memory
Geil PC2-4300
Geil has been very active in introducing a full range of Enthusiast memory over the past year. This was even clearer when Kingston and Geil were the first two manufacturers to supply DDR2 memory for testing.Test DIMMs were a matched pair of single-sided 512MB DDR2 DIMMs with lightweight aluminum heatspreaders. The Geil aluminum heatspreaders appear just as effective as others in this roundup, but they are much lighter than some other solutions. Geil also includes the temperature-sensitive label on the DIMM to report heat-sink temperature. While a good idea, the labels are all but hidden away when memory is mounted and they are, therefore, not very useful for truly monitoring memory temperature. They are nice to look at and talk about, however, and screen-based temperature monitoring will probably make its way to Enthusiast memory, eventually.
We do not know what memory chips are used by Geil in their memory, and the performance in our memory tests was unique compared to other tested memory.
Test Results: Geil PC2-4300
The full suite of benchmark tests were run at all memory speeds. This includes Quake3, Super PI, Sandra 2004 SP2 Memory Tests, Aida 32 Memory Tests, and Return to Castle Wolfenstein-Enemy Territory. We also ran UT2003, Aquamark 3, and Comanche 4 at every memory speed to verify stability of the reported memory timings. All benchmarks and additional tests had to complete without incident for the memory settings to be considered stable.Geil PC2-4300 (DDR2 533) - 2 x 512Mb Single-Bank | |||||
Speed | Memory Timings & Voltage | Quake3 fps | Sandra UNBuffered | Sandra Standard Buffered | Super PI 2M places (time in sec) |
533DDR 800FSB |
4-4-4-10 1.8V |
363.4 | INT 2756 FLT 2828 |
INT 4854 FLT 4846 |
108 |
667DDR 1000FSB |
5-4-5-10 2.0V |
449.6 | INT 3347 FLT 3422 |
INT 6016 FLT 6020 |
87 |
686DDR 258FSB |
5-5-5-10 2.0V |
458.0 | INT 3280 FLT 3387 |
INT 6130 FLT 6128 |
85 |
Geil PC2-4300 (DDR2 533) | ||||
Speed | RCW-ET Radar |
Aida 32 Read |
Aida 32 Write |
Aida 32 Total |
533DDR 800FSB |
77.5 | 5226 | 2059 | 7731 |
667DDR 1000FSB |
96.6 | 6466 | 2303 | 8769 |
686DDR 258FSB |
98.3 | 6857 | 2515 | 9102 |
Geil is an early DDR2, so we somewhat forgive the fact that across the board, it required slower timings than other DDR2 in this roundup. The memory bandwidth is also at the bottom of performance in almost every test. This is more likely the result of the early DDR2 chips used by Geil, and we are confident that current production is likely using updated DDR2 chips with better performance.
Despite the fact that this is single-sided memory running older chips at poorer memory timings, the Geil PC2 4300 also ran without incident at DDR2 667 and at the highest speed DDR2 686 that the Abit AA8 could achieve. While the Geil memory did require a bit more voltage to reach 667 and 686, it ran all of our tests without a problem at both 667 and 686. Things are certainly looking good for 667 speed on DDR2.
20 Comments
View All Comments
Wesley Fink - Thursday, July 8, 2004 - link
#9 - Actually the first number was copied incorrectly and has now been fixed. The tRas 11 line on p.3 now reads 5303-2344-7647.FlameDeer - Thursday, July 8, 2004 - link
Hi Wesley, nice article. :)Something to change:
At page 3, Micron PC2-4300U Table, Row tRAS 11,
Aida 32 Total should be "7697".
MIDIman - Thursday, July 8, 2004 - link
> When can we expect DDR2 for A64?http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?...
http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?...
mczak - Thursday, July 8, 2004 - link
Nice article, a real pity though there are no performance numbers for overclocked FSB only (i.e. FSB 258 / DDR2-"516"). There are some reasons to believe memory performance would also be quite a bit higher than with FSB200/DDR2-533...Bozo Galora - Thursday, July 8, 2004 - link
Another clear concise mem article by Prometheus.KillaKilla - Thursday, July 8, 2004 - link
When can we expect DDR2 for A64? Even thouthe they aren't so affected by lack of memory bandwidth...rjm55 - Thursday, July 8, 2004 - link
I am not usually that much into memory articles, but this is one of the best reviews I have seen on the new Intel architecture. It was surprising that even the budget DDR2 did 667. When will Intel be launching 667 as an "official" DDR2 speed?Anemone - Thursday, July 8, 2004 - link
VERY nice article - and informative on the limits that no one else is authoritatively reviewing. Thankyou and keep them coming!:)
skiboysteve - Thursday, July 8, 2004 - link
or... im blind..skiboysteve - Thursday, July 8, 2004 - link
you should mention in the benchmarks which modules are DS and SS, so people dont go ape shit over poor performance of say... GEIL..