AMD Sempron: A Fresh Take on Budget Computing
by Derek Wilson on July 28, 2004 12:01 AM EST- Posted in
- CPUs
DirectX 8 Gaming Performance
In Command & Conquer, the platform advantages of 754 really shine through in this game benchmark, as this game proves to be a very system limited benchmark. The Celeron 335 leads the Sempron by about 1.7%.Unreal Tournament shows the Celeron 335 leading the Athlon XP 2600+ and the Sempron 2800+ in the flyby test (which is traditionally more graphics card limited) while the top 6 performers in the Botmatch test are AMD processors. As the Botmatch more closely resembles gameplay and is more affected by CPU, this benchmark goes to the AMD processors.
With Warcraft, the Sempron 3100+ doesn't have a competitor that can touch it from Intel. This benchmark shows the Sempron 2800+ essentially performing equivalently to the Celeron 325.
Facebook
Twitter
RSS
55 Comments
View All Comments
Lonyo - Wednesday, July 28, 2004 - link
No edit feature on comments?Also, you can get an 865 for $56 at Newegg (new, ASRock "P4I65GV" i865GV Motherboard for Intel Socket 478 CPU -RETAIL)
So that means that the gap between systems is really only going to be $17 between a Sempron 2800+ system and a Celeron 335 system.
Lonyo - Wednesday, July 28, 2004 - link
Another point, the Sempron prices you quote are in 1000 unit quantities, so on the penultimate page, there is no point if comparing the cost of a system, unless you remember that the Sempron will be $10~$15 more expensive than the price you quote.Celeron 335 is $117 in 1000 unit quantities (on launch) and $127 at Newegg.
The Sempron will probably also be $10 more than the 1000 unit price.
Lonyo - Wednesday, July 28, 2004 - link
Pages 9 and 10 both make reference to the Celeron 225.I think this may be a typo for 335, as there is no 225 in the review ;)
Calin - Wednesday, July 28, 2004 - link
I was thinking - what is the electrical power (in relation with the other Athlons)? I am somewhat interested in a small and silent computer (socketA based) , and I would like to know which of those processons would be the happiest in crammed conditionsCalin
clarkey01 - Wednesday, July 28, 2004 - link
DerekWilson, yeah any chance you could have an 2.4Ghz Sempron going against a celeron @ The same speed.sandorski - Wednesday, July 28, 2004 - link
I might get one when they come out for Socket 939, just because of cost issues. The SocketA versions certainly sucks when compared to the 754 version and with the limited future for Socket 754 there's nothing tempting for me.Spacecomber - Wednesday, July 28, 2004 - link
I assume that the overclocking write-up will include the new Celerons, since I think that was skimmed over in the article covering their launch.When discussing the value of the new Celerons (assuming the this will be part of the overclocking write-up), backward compatability with older chipset motherboards would be helpful, too (e.g., 845E).
I mentioned this in my comments to the Celeron write-up; so, my apologies for being repetitive.
Stlr23 - Wednesday, July 28, 2004 - link
Sempron huh?.....Nice.LeeBear - Wednesday, July 28, 2004 - link
One 'budget' chip you didn't include in the roundup is the 2.4A Pentium 4 (Prescott, FSB533, 1MB Cache). It's cheaper then the Celeron 335 and with overclocking it may provide some interesting results.-LeeBear
DerekWilson - Wednesday, July 28, 2004 - link
We will be working on the overclock article over the next couple days -- is there anything you guys would particularly like to see?