Conclusion

Obviously, that's only a brief glimpse at the processor histories of AMD and Intel, with a vague picture of the future. Dual core designs should start appearing within the next year, and rumors of quad core processors are also floating around the web. At some point, we will likely reach the limits of current manufacturing technologies, but that day is still a long ways off. AMD and Intel both have technologies in development that should carry us past 45 nm process technologies, and probably down to single digits in our lifetime. That's assuming we don't get quantum computers first, that make all of the current binary systems seem quaint by comparison.

The amount of processing power sitting in front of you right now was beyond comprehension a couple decades ago. Even the "average" computers of today would seem amazing to people even one decade in the past. Ten years ago, 3D was only dreamt about, and professional 3D accelerators cost thousands of dollars while doing far less that a "cheap" GeForce 3 or Radeon 8500. Ten years ago, 32-bit processors were still looking for a real operating system, and 64-bit was only used by governments and research centers. Ten years ago, a 100 MHz processor was as good as it got. Ten years ago, few people had ever used a networked computer at home, and 28.8 modems were amazingly fast. Here's hoping the gurus at AMD, Intel, and other companies can continue to amaze us for another ten years!

Stay tuned for more insider articles from Jarred, including a much anticipated GPU cheat sheet as well!

Concerning Intel...
Comments Locked

74 Comments

View All Comments

  • JarredWalton - Monday, August 23, 2004 - link

    There were some difficulties with the initial tables due to the way I wrote the HTML and the posting engine. Sorry for anyone that saw the "corrupted" tables. With the decreased font size, they should look a little better now.
  • TrogdorJW - Monday, August 23, 2004 - link

    They are, Pumpkin. That's how it's showing up as well. Only the forthcoming P4EE 3.73 GHz will be something else, AFAIK. It's listed as a Prescott with 2 MB L2 cache.
  • Pumpkinierre - Monday, August 23, 2004 - link

    I thought P4EEs were Gallatin cores. It seems to correspond to the 2MB L3 Gallatine cored Xeon in description.
  • Maleficus - Monday, August 23, 2004 - link

    Very well written, very informative. Excellent job!

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now