Read Tests - Printed Media

Lower seek times are better.

Seek Times - Pressed CD 74:40.02
Drive Random Full
AOpen DDW8800 122ms 188ms
ASUS DRW-0802P 127ms 296ms
Gigabyte GO-W0808A 116ms 232ms
LG GSA-4120B 125ms 242ms
MSI DR12-A 84ms 153ms
Nu Tech DDW-082 113ms 160ms
Pioneer DVR-108D 130ms 355ms
Plextor PX-712A 112ms 165ms
Sony DRU-530A 86ms 155ms
Sony DRU-700A 119ms 245ms
Toshiba SD-R5272 110ms 169ms

Seek Times - DVD 4.38GB
Drive Random Full
AOpen DDW8800 114ms 272ms
ASUS DRW-0802P 130ms 312ms
Gigabyte GO-W0808A 102ms 194ms
LG GSA-4120B 94ms 195ms
MSI DR12-A 106ms 224ms
Nu Tech DDW-082 99ms 171ms
Pioneer DVR-108D 136ms 345ms
Plextor 712A 107ms 259ms
Sony DRU-530A 129ms 204ms
Sony DRU-700A 121ms 231ms
Toshiba SD-R5272 97ms 180ms

Read - Pressed CD
Drive Average Read Length
AOpen DDW8800 31.35X 19:57.7
ASUS DRW-0802P 30.89X 19:57.7
Gigabyte GO-W0808A 30.12X 19:57.7
LG GSA-4120B 32.50X 19:57.7
MSI DR12-A 31.81X 19:57.7
Nu Tech DDW-082 33.22X 19:57.7
Pioneer DVR-108D 31.74X 19:57.7
Plextor 712A 33.25X 19:57.7
Sony DRU-530A 31.80X 19:57.7
Sony DRU-700A 31.06X 19:57.7
Toshiba SD-R5272 31.22X 19:57.7

Read - DVDR
Drive Average Read Length
AOpen DDW8800 3.75X 4.38GB
ASUS DRW-0802P 6.27X 4.38GB
Gigabyte GO-W0808A 6.16X 4.38GB
LG GSA-4120B 7.58X 4.38GB
MSI DR12-A 8.22X 4.38GB
Pioneer DVR-108D 9.38X 4.38GB
Nu Tech DDW-082 6.53X 4.38GB
Plextor 712A 6.21X 4.38GB
Sony DRU-530A 5.79X 4.38GB
Sony DRU-700A 6.20X 4.38GB
Toshiba SD-R5272 6.61X 4.38GB

Read - Pressed DVD Video
Drive Average Read Length
AOpen DDW8800 3.44X 7.88GB
ASUS DRW-0802P 6.34X 7.88GB
Gigabyte GO-W0808A 6.31X 7.88GB
LG GSA-4120B 6.88X 7.88GB
MSI DR12-A 6.84X 7.88GB
Nu Tech DDW-082 4.30X 7.88GB
Pioneer DVR-108D 5.40X 7.88GB
Plextor 712A 6.18X 7.88GB
Sony DRU-530A 6.45X 7.88GB
Sony DRU-700A 5.88X 7.88GB
Toshiba SD-R5272 6.44X 7.88GB

Burn Tests DVD+/-RW Media Final Thoughts
Comments Locked

36 Comments

View All Comments

  • RyanVM - Tuesday, August 31, 2004 - link

    No SATA? Count me out.

    (I hope manufacturers read these comments)
  • Fishie - Tuesday, August 31, 2004 - link

    I decided to test that Ritek DVD+R DL (DVD 9) disc in my Toshiba M1802 DVD-ROM. It actually finished the test but it doesn't look so good.

    http://www.adventurousduo.com/host/ritekr9dltoshib...
  • KristopherKubicki - Tuesday, August 31, 2004 - link

    Ian@CDRlabs:
    >How can you say this drive is the best you've tested when you haven't even burned any discs at 16x?

    Um? It burns the best quality discs at 12X and 8X. It doesnt have to burn at 16X to still burn better than any drive we have tested. And not that that really matters since 16X media availabilty is fairly non-existant still.

    Kristopher
  • Fishie - Tuesday, August 31, 2004 - link

    Unfortunately, I only have Ritek GO3s right now so I cannot test 16x.I forgot to mention that I had the same results burning a Ritek 2.4x DVD-R9. It seemed to burn fine (using the latest version of Nero and DVD Shrink) but when I read it, it fails at the second layer.
  • Degrador - Tuesday, August 31, 2004 - link

    With the 1.04 and 1.06 firmwares, yes, 12X was faster than 16X. However 1.10 starts the 16X zone a bit earlier, enough so that 16X burning is now faster than 12X. And yes, I also own one. However I use the beta firmware hack made by >:NIL - this allows overburning of 4X media (I can write Ritek G04s at 12X). Btw, booktype setting doesn't matter with DVD-R, it's not applicable.
  • Fishie - Tuesday, August 31, 2004 - link

    I own a 108. Yes, it does read slower than it's counterparts. My Lite-On SOHC-5232K/Toshiba M1802 are faster readers. What I don't understand is why the review was done with firmware version 1.04 when they have two new firmwares out? I am using firmware 1.10 and it will burn my Ritek R03s 8x at 12x. It would only do 8x with v1.04

    http://wwwbsc.pioneer.co.jp/product-e/ibs/device_e...

    http://wwwbsc.pioneer.co.jp/product-e/ibs/device_e...

    http://www.pioneer-eur.com/eur/support_software.js...

    Also, CDR Info did a review. On their tests, the write time was faster at 12x than 16x. They list a quote from Pioneer as to why this happens. As far as booktype setting: With +R DL media, it automaticaly sets it to 0000h (DVD-ROM). It doesn't support it with -/+ R.
  • LittleKing - Tuesday, August 31, 2004 - link

    Good review, but unless I'm looking at it wrong, the "Read Tests - Printed Media" page shows this to be a bit slower than it's counter parts.

    Also the overimage change doesn't work in FoxFire.

    LK
  • Ian@CDRlabs - Tuesday, August 31, 2004 - link

    How can you say this drive is the best you've tested when you haven't even burned any discs at 16x?
  • danidentity - Tuesday, August 31, 2004 - link

    Can't wait to see how the ND-3500A compares. If you guys want to test it, it's readily available at Newegg.

    And I'm not sure if you know, but it burns CD-R at 48x versus 32x for the Pioneer 108.
  • hjs - Tuesday, August 31, 2004 - link

    Can't wait to see the benq tested (who also has that bitsetting thing onboard)

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now