Intel Mobile Processors
The mobile sector usually values battery life over top performance, so changes are less dramatic. Updates are once again in red, and you can refer to our last Intel Mobile/Server Roadmap for more information. We have split the mobile charts into two tables, one for the Banias/Dothan processors, which require less battery power and offer better performance at a given clock rate, and a second for mobile processors based off the NetBurst architecture. Intel refers to these as the "mobility" and "transportable" platforms, respectively, and we'll start with the former.Intel Mobility Socket 479M Lineup | |||||
Performance Processors | |||||
Processor | Code Name | Speed | Cache | FSB | Launch Date |
Pentium M >= 780 | Dothan | >= 2.26 GHz | 2 MB | 533 MHz | Q4'05 |
Pentium M 780 | Dothan | 2.26 GHz | 2 MB | 533 MHz | Q3'05 |
Pentium M 770 | Dothan | 2.13 GHz | 2 MB | 533 MHz | Q1'05 |
Pentium M 765 | Dothan | 2.10 GHz | 2 MB | 400 MHz | Q4'04 |
Pentium M 760 | Dothan | 2.00 GHz | 2 MB | 533 MHz | Q1'05 |
Pentium M >= 758 LV | Dothan | >= 1.50 GHz | 2 MB | 400 MHz | Q4'05 |
Pentium M 758 LV | Dothan | 1.50 GHz | 2 MB | 400 MHz | Q1'05 |
Pentium M 755 | Dothan | 2.00 GHz | 2 MB | 400 MHz | Already available |
Pentium M >= 753 ULV | Dothan | >= 1.20 GHz | 2 MB | 400 MHz | Q4'05 |
Pentium M 753 ULV | Dothan | 1.20 GHz | 2 MB | 400 MHz | Q1'05 |
Pentium M 750 | Dothan | 1.86 GHz | 2 MB | 533 MHz | Q1'05 |
Pentium M 745 | Dothan | 1.80 GHz | 2 MB | 400 MHz | Already available |
Pentium M 740 | Dothan | 1.73 GHz | 2 MB | 533 MHz | Q1'05 |
Pentium M 738 LV | Dothan | 1.40 GHz | 2 MB | 400 MHz | Already available |
Pentium M 735 | Dothan | 1.70 GHz | 2 MB | 400 MHz | Already available |
Pentium M 733/J ULV | Dothan | 1.10 GHz | 2 MB | 400 MHz | Already available |
Pentium M 730 | Dothan | 1.60 GHz | 2 MB | 533 MHz | Q1'05 |
Pentium M 725 | Dothan | 1.60 GHz | 2 MB | 400 MHz | Already available |
Pentium M 723 ULV | Dothan | 1.00 GHz | 2 MB | 400 MHz | Already available |
Pentium M 715 | Dothan | 1.50 GHz | 2 MB | 400 MHz | Already available |
Pentium M 713 ULV | Banias | 1.10 GHz | 1 MB | 400 MHz | Already available |
Budget Processors | |||||
Processor | Code Name | Speed | Cache | FSB | Launch Date |
Celeron M >= 390 | Dothan | >= 1.70 GHz | 1 MB | 400 MHz | Q4'05 |
Celeron M 390 | Dothan | 1.70 GHz | 512 KB | 400 MHz | Q3'05 |
Celeron M 380 | Dothan | 1.60 GHz | 1 MB | 400 MHz | Q1'05 |
Celeron M >= 373 ULV | Dothan | >= 1.00 GHz | 512 KB | 400 MHz | Q4'05 |
Celeron M 373 ULV | Dothan | 1.00 GHz | 512 KB | 400 MHz | Q1'05 |
Celeron M 370 | Dothan | 1.50 GHz | 1 MB | 400 MHz | Q1'05 |
Celeron M 360/J | Dothan | 1.40 GHz | 1 MB | 400 MHz | Q1'05 |
Celeron M 353 ULV | Dothan | 900 MHz | 512 KB | 400 MHz | Q1'05 |
Celeron M 350/J | Dothan | 1.30 GHz | 1 MB | 400 MHz | Q1'05 |
Celeron M 340 | Banias | 1.50 GHz | 512 KB | 400 MHz | Q1'05 |
Celeron M 330 | Banias | 1.40 GHz | 512 KB | 400 MHz | Q1'05 |
Celeron M 320 | Banias | 1.30 GHz | 512 KB | 400 MHz | Q1'05 |
If you were unimpressed by the changes to the desktop roadmap, the mobile front has even less news. For the true mobility processors, the only new additions are the Celeron M 390 and the Pentium M 780. There are also several "greater than or equal to" entries in the latest roadmap. Whether those are uncertain due to manufacturing concerns or due to a lack of competition is up for debate. The Banias and Dothan cores were really designed with a set performance/thermal level in mind, so we do not find as much tweaking for higher performance as we see in the desktop sector. The 2.26 GHz of the Pentium M 780 is going to be very close to the maximum clock speed that the design can reach without a die shrink or a large increase in heat output.
Intel Transportable Socket 478M Lineup | ||||
Performance Processors | ||||
Processor | Speed | Cache | FSB | Launch Date |
Mobile P4 558 | 3.60 GHz | 1 MB | 533 MHz | Cancelled |
Mobile P4 552 | 3.46 GHz | 1 MB | 533 MHz | Q1'05 |
Mobile P4 548 | 3.33 GHz | 1 MB | 533 MHz | Already available |
Mobile P4 538 | 3.20 GHz | 1 MB | 533 MHz | Already available |
Mobile P4 532 | 3.06 GHz | 1 MB | 533 MHz | Already available |
Mobile P4 518 | 2.80 GHz | 1 MB | 533 MHz | Already available |
Budget Processors | ||||
Processor | Speed | Cache | FSB | Launch Date |
Mobile Celeron D 350 | 3.20 GHz | 256 KB | 533 MHz | Cancelled |
Mobile Celeron D 345 | 3.06 GHz | 256 KB | 533 MHz | Q4'04 |
Mobile Celeron D 340 | 2.93 GHz | 256 KB | 533 MHz | Already available |
Mobile Celeron D 335 | 2.80 GHz | 256 KB | 533 MHz | Already available |
Mobile Celeron D 330 | 2.66 GHz | 256 KB | 533 MHz | Already available |
Mobile Celeron D 325 | 2.53 GHz | 256 KB | 533 MHz | Already available |
Taking a look at the "transportable" processors, the only changes are the cancellation of the two fastest - and hottest - processors based off the NetBurst architecture. NetBurst was never really designed for the mobile sector, and most of the laptops that use these chips target the "desktop replacement" (DTR) segment rather than true mobility. The cancellations reflect Intel's acknowledgement of this fact, as well as their confidence in the Pentium M and Celeron M parts. They could have easily shipped these parts, but demand is simply not great enough to warrant it. Not only has Intel cancelled the 558 and 350 parts, but the entire NetBurst mobile line is scheduled to cease production in Q2'05. This is no real loss, as it means future laptops will simply shift to using more appropriate parts.
22 Comments
View All Comments
Da DvD - Wednesday, October 27, 2004 - link
I just browsed through our local shop's flyer and their usage of Intel's numbering scheme is crazy. Sometimes they don't even mention the GHz but just say Pentium 4 540. I'm pretty sure that many will think this runs at 540 MHz, the salesmen are gonna have a hard time explaining all this to the customer.I don't think the customer will even see there are different series (3xx, 5xx, 6xx, 7xx) but will just go for the higher number, or the easy to understand AMD alternative (3000+ sounds good afterall)
The dualcore makes things even worse.
Let's hope the x20, x30 and x40 names are temporary; the names suggest a x40 has double the performance of the x20 while it'll be about 10% faster at most.Although i can see Intel pulling that off.
danidentity - Wednesday, October 27, 2004 - link
You say the 500 series 'J' processors are already available, but I haven't seen them for sale at a single online store. Why do you list them as already available?