Multiple Front Side Buses; Coming to an Intel Server Near You
by Kristopher Kubicki on November 4, 2004 4:13 AM EST- Posted in
- CPUs
Dissecting code names seems like a full time job for some of
us lately. Fortunately, a full time job pays for my schooling so here are the
breakdown of Intel's newest code names, and what they mean to us.
Hopefully you have kept up with the last few articles from
Anand and Jarred concerning dual core
product SKUs and general Intel roadmaps.
Of course, processors are only half of Intel's business - core logic composes
the less glamorous side of Intel. Although we have been talking
about Glenwood and Lakeport for several months now, today we are going to look
at Intel's new server chipsets, Blackford and Greencreek.
Greencreek (also known as Greencreek 2S - 2Socket) is slated
as the Tumwater (E7525) replacement, while Blackford is the Lindenhurst (E7520)
replacement. In short, the two chipsets are nearly identical with Blackford
serving as the high end version of the platform. The large news here is Intel's
push for dual front side buses. The latest Intel roadmaps thoroughly describe
dual independent buses as:
"New 2S platform architecture for improved
performance"
2S, of course, denotes 2 Sockets. With advances towards
dual core processing, the idea of independent buses per socket probably
indicates the best approach possible for Intel to de-saturate the front side
bus. We already know that Twin Castle will utilize independent memory
controllers, and with Greencreek/Blackford showing up soon after with dedicated
paths to their memory controllers, we could see large boosts in memory IO. The
roadmap indicates Twin Castle will utilize multiple buses in later revisions as
well.
Aside from dual buses, the new processors incorporate some
other features as well, the largest being fully buffered DIMMs (FBD or
FB-DIMM). The Memory Forum actually has a very concise IDF presentation with
the memory architecture explained here. The
apparent problem with DDR2 DIMMs (particularly when there are 8 or more) is
that the signal gets very dirty. FB-DIMM attempts to solve this by placing a
memory buffer directly on the DIMM itself. FB-DIMM aims to replace registered
DIMMs, although the significant complexity of FBD will surely make it extremely
expensive.
Blackford/Greencreek also boast "enhanced storage
controllers" (most likely SATA-II) and EM64T compatibility as well. Below we
have a small cross section on various chipset names and the details we know
about them.
- Blackford: Lindenhurst successor for the Dempsey dual core processor. EM64T. Dual Independent FSB. FB-DIMM Support. Scheduled for H1'06.
- Greencreek: Tumwater successor for the Dempsey dual core processor. Will utilize two sockets. EM64T. Dual Independent FSB. FB-DIMM Support. Scheduled for H1'06.
- Twin Castle: 4 Socket platform for Xeon MP. Utilizes a dedicated memory controller. Will probably support dual core processors with a future revision that supports multiple (or at least dual FSB). Scheduled for Q1'06.
- Alviso: Intel's 915P chipset for the next generation Centrino platform. Scheduled for Q1'05.
- Sonoma: Next generation Centrino platform including Alviso. Scheduled for Q1'05.
- Napa: Successor for Sonoma designed for dual core mobility processors. Adds DDR2-667. Scheduled for Q1'06.
- Lakeport: 915P successor, supports 1066FSB, more PCIe lanes and 667MHz DDR-2, AMT and more EIST revisions. Scheduled for Q2'05.
- Glenwood: 925XE successor. Supports everything Lakeport does but should also include ECC capability. Scheduled for launch with Lakeport.
- Tekoa: Intel's next generation gigabit Ethernet chipset for deployment with Intel core logic.
- Mukilteo: Uniprocessor workstation release for the Glenwood/Lakeport generation. Supports EM64T.
- ICH7: Next generation south bridge. Comes in several different versions including a "Raid" version, DH (Ditigal Home), DO (Digital Office), DE (Digital Enterprise) versions as well.
Recently we have seen motherboard manufacturers disclose Pentium M platforms for the desktop. As more and more people start adopting higher clocked Pentium Ms over Celerons and Pentium 4s, don't be surprised to hear a lot more people giving attention to all things Centrino.
19 Comments
View All Comments
Pumpkinierre - Friday, November 5, 2004 - link
God what a mish mash! I prefer more Mhz is better.Viditor - Friday, November 5, 2004 - link
What I have yet to see on any Intel roadmap is how they intend to address the PAE issue with their Northbridge (the hardware IOMMU).IntelUser2000 - Thursday, November 4, 2004 - link
Foxton Technlogy (FT): Modifies CPU frequency on the fly, sort of like EIST (enterprise)Foxton is much much more advanced than EIST, that's all I got to say.
AussieGamer - Thursday, November 4, 2004 - link
#5What the hell are you smoking?? And can I have some?
Pete84 - Thursday, November 4, 2004 - link
Wow, this article is a prime example of how HUGE Intel is. AMD is not even a serious contender in the chipset field, while Intel is a leader.Add all the other programs that Intel is running, and it isn't a case of Processor A vs Processor B company at all, it is VERY BIG conglomerate vs proc design company.
Go AMD!!!
And yes, I am an AMD fanboy . . . how did you guess?
KristopherKubicki - Thursday, November 4, 2004 - link
I wouldnt really call this speculation. This information is what Intel has laid out in their roadmap.Kristopher
stephenbrooks - Thursday, November 4, 2004 - link
--[It's pointless to speculate about cores.]--Then why'd you just read the...
:)
Gholam - Thursday, November 4, 2004 - link
Funny that no one has pitched a hissy fit about that Tekoa network chip, considering that it's named after a settlement in Gush Etzion :) (that's in west bank if you don't know)GhandiInstinct - Thursday, November 4, 2004 - link
It's pointless to speculate about cores.