BIOS Features: ATI Bullhead

It is rare that we would want to show the BIOS options for a chipset in more than basic features, but the options available to the reviewer are unusually complete on the ATI Bullhead.

ATI chose the AMI BIOS, which is used by Asus and many other manufacturers on their AMD Athlon 64 motherboards.



Since the ATI RX480 is designed for qualification, you may not see the same range of tweaking options on shipping boards. However, it is worth showing some of the more interesting options from the BIOS, just so readers will know that they can be implemented on an ATI RX480/RS480 board.



Many tweaks can be found in the Advanced Menu. This includes many of the features of interest to overclockers.



As you can see, the AMD Overclocking section has adjustments for Ratios, CPU voltage, clock speed, Hyper Transport Speed, Auto-Tuning, and PCIe clock.



Memory timings and voltage are found in the Chipset, Northbridge menu.



Memory tweaks even include a User Config mode with additional memory adjustments. The Memory controls are among the best that you will ever see in an Athlon 64 BIOS.



The Southbridge controls include a range of options for the integrated peripherals...



...and a Southbridge Debug Configuration menu.



For RS480 chipsets, you will also find an RS480 menu under chipsets. Options in the RS480 allow control of the integrated graphics and graphics related options like SurroundView.

The point, of course, is that ATI supplied the ATI Bullhead loaded with the kinds of options that reviewers need to get the most out of the RX480/RS480 chipset. With a full range of options and wide adjustment ranges, we couldn't wait to see where we could take the Bullhead in overclocking.

ATI Bullhead Reference Board: Basic Features Overclocking: ATI Bullhead
Comments Locked

45 Comments

View All Comments

  • kogase - Monday, November 8, 2004 - link

    Eh... I don't think the boards are kicking Intel's ass. A64 is.
  • fuzzynavel - Monday, November 8, 2004 - link

    I didn't realise that the nforce4 and ATI mobos...kicked intels ass so badly!! Not bad for a first attempt....just avoid the integrated graphics and it all looks sweet
  • Denial - Monday, November 8, 2004 - link

    This is nice and all, but I'm not uprading until dual cores are out. The difference between my home PC (P4 2.8) and office workstation (dual 2.66 xeons) is night and day. It's at the point that my home PC drives me nuts when one process brings everything else to a halt (all the more frustrating when it's something like explorer running amok). I've absolutely had it with single CPU's, no more!
  • VaultDweller - Monday, November 8, 2004 - link

    The tables on pages 10 and 11 both list Halo as the first benchmark, but the review text on page 10 refers to a 14.4% gain in 'Quake 3.' According to the table, that 14.4% was for Halo.
  • MAME - Monday, November 8, 2004 - link

    sweet

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now