Thermals Micro BTX (uBTX)

This is where everything we have heard about the BTX form factor is either proven right or wrong. Intel claims BTX the better design to efficiently cool more components with less equipment while using less power and space. Intel released a virtual press kit on their BTX form factor in April of this year. Unfortunately, the press kit is a little too general to really draw many conclusions, but feel free to judge for yourself.

Intel's press kit reports that the BTX design cools the CPU to 2 degrees lower than the ATX form factor while only providing 40 cubic feet per minute, or 40 cfm with our Type I Thermal Module. ATX, on the other hand, requires 150 linear feet per minute, or 150 lfm.

We performed our inch by inch temperature observation with the D915GMH microBTX motherboard and the Pentium 550 CPU in the AOpen B300 which is 15" in width by 13" in depth.


Click to Enlarge

From our results above we see that the temperatures of each square inch of the case are a few degrees higher than those we found on our ATX Ahanix D.Vine 5 chassis. The warmest pocket of air hovers between the PCIe card, Southbridge, Northbridge, and CPU. This area, which averages about 35 degrees, is warmer than the ATX ambient average of about 32 degrees. Intel's whitepaper was not clear on the equipment they used to get the results in their table but from our results, the standard ATX system performs cooler than the BTX system. The microATX system, however, produced temperatures higher than those of the microBTX system.


Click to Enlarge

The results for the core temperatures of each component shown above also tell us that the microBTX equipment does not exactly perform better than the ATX hardware, but for the amount of fans in the system, microBTX is more efficient when it comes to cost of energy and space. With only the CPU's HSF and the power supply's single 80mm fan, the uBTX system performs at temperatures lower than an uATX system with three case fans and a dedicated CPU HSF.


Click to Enlarge

These temperatures are not set in stone for every processor Intel manufacturers or will release in the future. Each will require a different thermal module according to their Thermal Design Power rating. For example, The Pentium 550J will come bundled with a Type I Stacked-fin module whereas the Pentium 560J will come with the Type I Spiral-fin module. Obviously the spiral-fin module will dissipate heat better than the stacked fins.

Thermals: Desktop ATX Noise Testing, ATX, BTX
Comments Locked

77 Comments

View All Comments

  • ZobarStyl - Monday, November 15, 2004 - link

    God looking at those small cases makes me tremble and remember my parent's old IBM Pentium I system where you had to remove the PSU and the CD drive to install the RAM. I was so glad when I saw computers moving AWAY from this type of design...forget footprint, I want a case I can actually work in.

    Either way, congrats to Intel on making a new Delleron case, but I'm simply not interested. Great for OEM's but useless for me, just like most of Intel's products...

    As for #3's question, why does Intel need it outside of helping their OEM buddies? Dual core is only going to make Prescott's heat issues stand out further and their x20/30/40's on the roadmap still are clocked in the range where they are going to be high heat output. All that heat has to go somewhere...
  • shabby - Monday, November 15, 2004 - link

    #5 that must be the canadian version, it'll keep us warm during winter by exhausting warm air into our faces.
  • Jeff7181 - Monday, November 15, 2004 - link

    Am I reading this right... warm air from the CPU is exhausted out the FRONT of the case????
  • mcveigh - Monday, November 15, 2004 - link

    I can't get past page 1??????
  • skunkbuster - Monday, November 15, 2004 - link

    will intel even need btx anymore? since they are probably going to be dumping the p4 in favor of the pM(eventually)?
    i thought one of the main reasons why btx was designed was to better handle the hotter p4 processors and to cool them more efficiently?
  • PuravSanghani - Monday, November 15, 2004 - link

    Thanks MAME, problem fixed :)
  • MAME - Monday, November 15, 2004 - link

    thumbnail of this article doesn't load on front page

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now