NVIDIA's GeForce 6 SLI: Demolishing Performance Barriers
by Anand Lal Shimpi on November 23, 2004 10:23 AM EST- Posted in
- GPUs
The Test
Due to our initial sample having so many problems and our replacement board arriving one day before this review went live, we weren’t able to run any benchmarks with ATI’s X800 XT on ASUS’ nForce4 board for comparison. Feel free to look at our other reviews to get an idea for how ATI stacks up to a single 6800 Ultra in order to estimate where ATI would fit in today’s performance tests.
Our system was configured as follows:
AMD Athlon 64 4000+
ASUS A8N-SLI Deluxe (nForce4 SLI) Motherboard
1GB OCZ DDR400 3-3-3-10 (our first board required the use of very lax timings)
2 x NVIDIA GeForce 6800 Ultra PCI Express cards (clocked at 400/1100)
2 x NVIDIA GeForce 6800GT PCI Express cards (clocked at 350/1000)
2 x NVIDIA GeForce 6600GT PCI Express cards (clocked at 500/500)
Windows XP Service Pack 2 with DirectX 9.0c
NVIDIA ForceWare 69.33 Drivers
Facebook
Twitter
RSS
74 Comments
View All Comments
bob661 - Tuesday, November 23, 2004 - link
#18The hardcore gamers would just buy new video cards.
reboos - Tuesday, November 23, 2004 - link
"Nvidia bought the patents, pending patent applications, trademarks, brand names, and chip inventory related to the graphics business of 3dfx."http://slashdot.org/articles/00/12/15/2244256.shtm...
fuzzynavel - Tuesday, November 23, 2004 - link
I think 3DFX were bought by nvidia...or at least the rights to the technology....so it is technically the same company...I remember the days of 3DFX scan line interleave....fantastic!bob661 - Tuesday, November 23, 2004 - link
#17Two Opterons would be downright scary if they were limited too. But a 4000 is no slouch. :-) It's still amazing. I happen to agree with #12 but the real test of that theory would be to test slower CPU's and see how the performance scales.
reboos - Tuesday, November 23, 2004 - link
Odd as it may sound, should we be thanking 3DFX for this?http://slashdot.org/articles/00/12/15/2244256.shtm...
Gnoad - Tuesday, November 23, 2004 - link
Although SLI is exciting, I found myself wanting more info on the Asus board...haris - Tuesday, November 23, 2004 - link
I just had some more thoughts about why SLI/Multi rendering might not be such a great move by Nvidia/ATI.When they launch their next generation cards they are expecting to rake in some extra money from the extreme gamers, right? What happens to that same card when they start purchasing relatively cheap last gen cards instead. This might then lead to something like this: In order for them to get that additional $ during the begining of the next gen card's life cycle they might have to slow down the production cycle of cards to give them more time in the high-end position.
Jeff7181 - Tuesday, November 23, 2004 - link
#14... why? You have TWO GPU's here... and ONE CPU. Why is it so amazing that two GPU's can put the squeenze on one CPU? Now... stick a 6800U SLI setup with a couple Opteron 250's with an application that's multi-threaded and THEN I'd be amazed if it was still CPU limited.Aquila76 - Tuesday, November 23, 2004 - link
Or was that 330 Watts the total system usage? (doubtful)Aquila76 - Tuesday, November 23, 2004 - link
What power supply was used in your testbed? If the SLI setup requires at load ~ 330 Watts, I would think you'd need around a 550W unit for your setup.