OCZ VX Memory + DFI nForce4 = DDR533 at 2-2-2
by Wesley Fink on March 4, 2005 6:45 AM EST- Posted in
- Memory
Performance Test Configuration
The OCZ VX DDR500 was tested with the DFI LANParty nF4 SLI-DR Athlon 64 Socket 939 motherboard. The new DFI nForce4 SLI and Ultra are the only current production boards that support the voltages required for top VX performance. An OCZ DDR Booster can be used with motherboards without support for high memory voltages. Other components remain the same as used in the memory setup in Athlon 64 Memory: Rewriting the Rules .All other memory tests were run earlier on the MSI K8N Neo2, based on the nForce 3 Ultra. We have already shown performance of the nF3 and nF4 to be virtually identical in our launch reviews of the nForce4 chipset. Similarly AGP and PCIe performance has been shown to be virtually the same using the same video card (6800 Ultra AGP vs. 6800 Ultra PCIe. For these reasons we did not retest earlier memory on the DFI. However, we were concerned about the potential performance difference in 61.77 video drivers compared to 71.80, so we ran a quick set of comparisons. 71.80 drivers were slightly faster in game benchmarks than 71.80 and slightly slower than 61.77 in memory bandwidth tests. However, the differences were small enough that we were confident the results were not seriously distorted by using the 71.80 drivers.
The A64 test bed for testing the OCZ VX and the standard MSI test bed both include components that have been proven in Socket 939 Athlon 64 benchmarking, such as the Socket 939 FX53 (same specifications as current 4000+), and the OCZ Power Stream 520 Power Supply. Since the Athlon 64 tests represent a new series of DDR testing, we have chosen the current generation nVidia 6800 Ultra video card for benchmarking. We have found the 6800 Ultra to be a particularly good performance match to nVidia motherboards.
All other basic test conditions attempted to mirror those used in our earlier Intel memory reviews. However, test results are not directly comparable to tests performed on the Intel test bed.
AMD nForce4 Performance Test Configuration | |
Processor(s): | AMD FX53 Athlon 64 (2.4GHz, Socket 939, 1 MB cache, Dual Channel, 1000HT) |
RAM: | OCZ EL PC4000 VX Gold (DS) 2X512MB Corsair TwinX1024-4400C25 (DS) 2X512MB G. Skill TCCD (DS) 2X512MB PQI 3200 Turbo (DS) 2X512MB Crucial Ballistix (DS) 2X512MB Geil PC3200 Ultra X (DS) 2X512MB OCZ PC3200 Platinum Rev 2 (DS) 2X512MB OCZ PC3700 Gold Rev 3 (DS) 2X512MB |
Hard Drives: | Seagate 120GB PATA (IDE) 7200RPM 8MB Cache |
PCI/AGP Speed: | Fixed at 33/66 |
Video Card(s): | nVidia 6800 Ultra 256MB, 256MB aperture, 1024x768x32 |
Video Drivers: | nVidia Forceware 71.80 nVidia Forceware 61.77 |
Power Supply: | OCZ Power Stream 520W |
Operating System(s): | Windows XP Professional SP1 |
Motherboards: | DFI LANParty nF4 SLI-DR MSI K8N Neo2 Platinum (nForce3) |
With nForce3 motherboards, we achieved the fastest performance on AMD Athlon 64 chipsets (nForce3, VIA K8T800 PRO) at Cycle Time or tRAS of 10. However, as we saw in the recent nForce4 SLI roundup, the nForce4 appears to behave a bit differently with memory. In the SLI roundup, we found a tRAS of 7 to be ideal for memory based on Samsung TCCD chips. Therefore, we ran a complete set of Memtest86 benchmarks with only tRAS varied to determine the best tRAS setting for OCZ VX.
Memtest86 Bandwidth DFI nForce4, Athlon64 4000+, OCZ VX |
|
2 tRAS | 2572 |
3 tRAS | 2572 |
4 tRAS | 2572 |
5 tRAS | 2640 |
6 tRAS | 2640 |
7 tRAS | 2640 |
8 tRAS | 2505 |
9 tRAS | 2505 |
10 tRAS | 2505 |
11 tRAS | 2441 |
12 tRAS | 2383 |
These tests are particularly easy to do with the DFI nF4 boards, since memtest86 is built into the BIOS. To boot memtest86, you only have to enable it in BIOS and the system will boot directly into memtest86. This makes it very easy to test various memory timings, but memtest86 should be disabled in BIOS when you are ready to boot into the system.
The best memory bandwidth with VX and the 4000+ was achieved in the tRAS 5 to tRAS 7 range. Therefore, all VX testing was done with a tRAS setting of 6.
Test Settings
All AMD Athlon 64 processors are unlocked downward, and the FX CPUs are unlocked up and down. This feature allows a different approach to memory testing, which truly measures performance differences in memory speed alone. All tests were run with CPU speed as close to the specified 2.4GHz of the 4000+/FX53 as possible, with CPU speed/Memory Speed increased at lower multipliers to achieve 2.4Ghz. This approach allows the true measurement of the impact of higher memory speed and timings on performance, since CPU speed is fixed, removing CPU speed as a factor in memory performance.The following settings were tested with the OCZ EL PC4000 VX Gold on the DFI nF4 test bed:
- 2.4GHz at 12x200 (DDR400) - the highest stock memory speed supported on K8T800-Pro/nF3-4/SiS755-FX motherboards.
- 2.4GHz at 11x218 (DDR436) - a ratio near the standard DDR433 speed
- 2.4GHz at 10x240 (DDR480) - a ratio near the standard rating of DDR466
- 2.4GHz at 9x267 (DDR533) - a standard memory speed used in testing other high-speed memory
- Highest Memory Speed - the highest memory speed that we could achieve regardless of the multiplier. This setting was achieved at a 1T command rate with the VX, so this is also the result that produces the best memory performance.
We ran our standard suite of memory performance benchmarks - Quake 3, Return to Castle Wolfenstein-Enemy Territory-Radar, Super Pi 2M, and Sandra 2004 Standard and UnBuffered. Since the results for Athlon 64 tests are new, we are now including Sandra Buffered (Standard) test results and Sandra UnBuffered test results. RTCW Enemy Territory has also been added as a standard memory benchmark.
67 Comments
View All Comments
Wesley Fink - Friday, March 4, 2005 - link
#26 - You need to take a close look at DDR400 2-2-2 VX vs. DDR400 2-2-2 with any other ram we have tested. The biggest news with VX is how fast the chips are at the same speed and timings compared to other chips, which we talked about in the article. There IS a difference in performance from DDR400 2-2-2 to DDR533 2-2-2 at the same clock speed but it is smaller than many imagine as I pointed out in the review. We have set up our AMD tests to really measure the impact of memory - removing as many other variables as possible.Beenthere - Friday, March 4, 2005 - link
Sorry but I don't see any justification for over-voltage RAM as the system performance increase is marginal at best. The cost doesn't justify the minimal gains. In addition more voltage = more heat, any way you slice it. This is more marketing hype and no measurable system performance increase as we've seen before from OCZ. Between OCZ and "DFI's gullible PC enthusiast product line", I'm sure they are laughing all the way to the bank. PT Barnum was correct...ChiefNutz - Friday, March 4, 2005 - link
The Article said that fourm rumors said the chips were built by winbond. I Though winbond left the memory market? anyone know any different??Wesley Fink - Friday, March 4, 2005 - link
Obviously the RTCW-ET results with VX at 2-3-2 are 116.7 with 61.77 vs. 119.3 with 71.80. This compares to our previous fastest 2-2-2 DDR400 at 110.8. We really do need the ability to correct in the comments section :-)Wesley Fink - Friday, March 4, 2005 - link
#15 - I did test with 61.77 to make sure the results were not too skewed by the newer 71.80 driver. Q3 and RTCW are slower with 61.77 but this is offset by the memroy bandwidth scores being higher. I just quickly ran 61.77 at 2-3-2-6 and 2,.6v since that was your greatest interest. Q3-554.1 (vs. 567.4), RTCW-ET-116.7 (vs.199.3), Sandra UNbuffered-2949 (vs.2927). The 61.77 results at 2-3-2 are still significantly higher than any 2-2-2 results at 400.#17 - In our launch review we clearly showed the MSI Neo2 to be the same performance as nF4. We have also shown in the past that AGP and PCIe using the same card are the same performance. Since the MSI does not support these extreme voltages we had to make some changes to test VX - which we detailed in the review.
I realize many of you do not want to believe that a memory running 2-3-2 can outperform another memory running 2-2-2 at the same speed, but this is not unique to VX. It is just that VX is an extreme example of a chip being faster at the same speed. Go back to benchmarks that included BH5 and you will see it is faster than TCCD at the same speed and timings.
LX - Friday, March 4, 2005 - link
Another typo: "OCZ LANParty nForce4"Hey, Anand, let Wesley have some sleep between reviews!
chr6 - Friday, March 4, 2005 - link
typo on last page, its enhanced bandwidth not extended, if i remember correctly.chr6 - Friday, March 4, 2005 - link
EddNog - Friday, March 4, 2005 - link
"Pwned."No, really...
"Pwned."
Rocket321 - Friday, March 4, 2005 - link
Now that you wont need all that extra ocz platinum r2, feel free to send some my way ;)