OCZ VX Revisited: DDR Updates on DFI nForce4
by Wesley Fink on March 30, 2005 12:05 AM EST- Posted in
- Memory
Test Results: Corsair XMS4404v1.1
To be considered stable for test purposes, Quake3 benchmark, UT2003 Demo, Super PI, Aquamark 3, and Comanche 4 had to complete without incident. Any of these, and in particular Super PI, will crash a less-than stable memory configuration.| Corsair XMS4404v1.1 (DDR550) - 2x512Mb Double-Bank | |||||||
| CPU Ratio at 2.4GHz | Memory Speed | Memory Timings & Voltage |
Quake3 fps |
Sandra UNBuffered | Sandra Standard Buffered | Super PI 2M places (time in sec) |
Wolfenstein - Radar - Enemy Territory fps |
| 12x200 | 400DDR | 2-3-3-6 2.6V 1T |
536.5 | INT 2653 FLT 2839 |
INT 6113 FLT 6066 |
82 | 113.2 |
| 11x218 | 436DDR | 2-3-3-6 2.6V 1T |
543.2 | INT 2772 FLT 3023 |
INT 6488 FLT 6419 |
81 | 114.0 |
| 10x240 | 480DDR | 2-3-3-6 2.8V 1T |
553.7 | INT 3037 FLT 3243 |
INT 6723 FLT 6645 |
80 | 115.9 |
| 9x267 | 533DDR | 2.5-3-3-6 2.8V 1T |
562.0 | INT 3196 FLT 3477 |
INT 7084 FLT 7004 |
77 | 117.2 |
| 9x303 (2.73 Ghz) |
Highest Memory Speed | 2.5-4-4-6 2.9V 1T |
620.7 | INT 3403 FLT 3660 |
INT 7742 FLT 7683 |
73 | 131.1 |
| 10x280 (2.8 GHz) |
Highest CPU/Mem Performance | 2.5-4-3-6 2.9V 1T |
626.0 | INT 3409 FLT 3611 |
INT 7799 FLT 7707 |
71 | 135.8 |
Corsair was reviewed in Corsair 4400C25: Taking Samsung TCCD to New Heights. It is very interesting to see that the DFI board opens up performance of the Corsair a bit more, allowing use to reach a high of 303 (DDR606) at 1T compared to the 295 (DDR590) top 1T performance in the past review. However, the fastest performance was achieved at 10x280 at faster memory timings of 2.5-4-3-6 and a higher CPU speed of 2.8GHz.
Corsair selected Samsung TCCD chips for absolute best performance at the top and they succeeded in reaching this goal. The compromise was a bit less performance at DDR400 - at least with the modules that we tested. However, we suspect that the timings used by DFI are not the best match to this Corsair memory, since regular TCCD memory rated at DDR400 outperforms the Corsair at the top - results that are the opposite of what we have seen on other nVidia chipset boards. It looks as if Corsair and DFI could squeeze more performance from this combination with some tweaking.
It is interesting in these test results that the faster 9x303 (2.73GHz) cannot match OCZ VX at 2.67GHz. However, at 2.8GHz (10x280), the Corsair TCCD can roughly match performance of VX at 2.67GHz. It is clear that faster 2-2-2 memory timings of the OCZ VX do matter when it comes to performance.
Facebook
Twitter
RSS
53 Comments
View All Comments
AnnihilatorX - Wednesday, March 30, 2005 - link
This memory rocks. Can someone please do me a favour of buying this memory for me from newegg, ship it to me (UK/HK) and I'll pay him cost + postage + a bit extra via paypal. Thanks very much. It's a bit annoying since you cannot buy this ram from HK. No suppliers.Just e-mail me at annihilator@x-annihilation.com
Thanks again
ozzimark - Wednesday, March 30, 2005 - link
*notes that it's 245mhz at 2.5-2-2-10ozzimark - Wednesday, March 30, 2005 - link
#28my ballistix can go to 245mhz with 2.7v before my memory controller starts hating me and having some serious stability issues. though they seem to scale nicely with voltage, i can't really test it out, because even at 3-4-4-10 with 2T, i can't get over 250mhz.
n yusef - Wednesday, March 30, 2005 - link
AnandTech should do a review of the TwinMOS UTT chips that cost $150 less than the VX. I bought VX before I heard about the TwinMOS stuff, but my friend is doing 2-2-2-6 at 255MHz with 3.4 volts at 1:1. My VX can do 260MHz, but I would give 5MHz RAM/FSB bandwidth and 50MHz core for $150 any day.JoKeRr - Wednesday, March 30, 2005 - link
one more thing, I've heard from many ppl that they're running their BH5 sticks (2x512) to 250 2-2-2-5 with like 3.1 to 3.2V, if u still do have some old BH5, would it be possible to lay a show down between bh5 and VX?? I think I saw a guy on xtremeresouce /or maybe system doing ddr293 with 4V with mushkin BH5 at 2-2-2-5 timing, that's crazy.JoKeRr - Wednesday, March 30, 2005 - link
How does the Ballistix react to voltage?? I've heard that Tccd doesn't react very well, but the old EB stuff could do 2.5-2-2-5 at ddr500 once u give it 3.1V. Could you plz try that and see how the Ballistix scale with voltage plz?? thankQ in advance.JoKeRr - Wednesday, March 30, 2005 - link
Rapsven - Wednesday, March 30, 2005 - link
23-If you are trying to get 2 gigabytes to do those speeds in tandem with the CPU, you'll have problems. Try using the regular 2*512 instead of 4*512 and see you can hit 250 fsb at 2-2-2.
Or ask the OCZ guys, they're very helpful.
ozzimark - Wednesday, March 30, 2005 - link
hmm, my bad, the [img] tags don't work here. just copy and paste that link :)and since it seems that some posts have been deleted, my above comment is in response to #13
ozzimark - Wednesday, March 30, 2005 - link
#14-that's quite interesting. maybe the spd's on the ram sticks are changing important values other than the cas, trcd, trp? i know that there are a lot of values that effect ram performance other than those three. i actually went through most of them on the dfi board, and found that lower isn't always better, similar to tras. though with that you said, i may have to go through and re-tweak my setup with the write benchmark in mind too. i never really gave it much thought assuming that it would scale similarily to read bandwidth.
also, i noticed some inconsistancies at various multipliers. i tested at two speeds, 230mhz (near the limit of my memory controller) at 2.5-2-2-10, and 200mhz at 2-2-2-10. (i use 2x512mb of crucial ballistix)
the only thing changed between runs is the cpu mutliplier. the ram is 1:1, and everything else remains constant.
[img]http://www.freewebs.com/cfeclipse/latency.PNG[/img]