Second Place: Hauppauge WinTV PVR-250

Hauppauge is a name that has been around in the PC TV tuner business for a very long time and they are also extremely common in the MCE scene.  Note that while Hauppauge has a fairly extensive lineup of TV tuners, most of them are quite similar to one another.  For example, the WinTV PVR-250 is identical to the PVR-500, although the latter has two tuners.  The PVR-250 is also identical to the PVR-250MCE and the PVR-350. 

The WinTV PVR-250 actually offered significantly better image quality than the competition.  Everything looked a lot softer rather than having that hard grainy look that we saw in the previous runner-ups. 


The overall picture is quite good, although the colors are a bit oversaturated. In the lower middle you can see minor text box issues.

There were very few text box related issues with the PVR-250, basically nothing compared to the previous few cards.  You do pay for the image quality though. The WinTV PVR-250 sells for between $130 - $150, over twice as much as the 3rd place ATI eHome Wonder.  At that price, it's tough to justify the Hauppauge, even taking into account the image quality benefits. 

Third Place - Tie: ATI eHome Wonder First Place: ATI TV Wonder Elite
Comments Locked

61 Comments

View All Comments

  • overclockingoodness - Tuesday, April 12, 2005 - link

    #7 (kjohnson): Did you not read the article? He said CNN and Weather channels are the only two channels that repeatedly show same programming in a given time frame. For CNN it's every 30 minutes.

    What's up with the "I hope that is not an indication of your ideology." statement. So, Anand can't even watch CNN and post screenshots because some readers don't like it. Why don't you just concentrate on other, more important parts of the review than worrying about stupid things like what he watches and what not?

    I have never found Anand's ideology to be wrong, so even if he does watch CNN - I don't think it matters. Stupid people, stupid comments...
  • scott967 - Tuesday, April 12, 2005 - link

    If you do this in the future, I would like to see a test of OTA ATSC reception for tuners. It seems to be a common problem with getting consistently good reception of the UHF band signal most broadcasters are assigned.

    Also, I found use of the terms "SD" and "HD" confusing. I have both NTSC and ATSC (8VSB) tuners, and the ATSC tuner receives either / both the SD format and HD format depending on the broadcaster. (The local FOX affiliate provides both feeds on different subchannels). ISTM that reception of the SD resolution is a little easier (fwerer dropouts) than the HD. I guess if you are talking cable, the SD/HD thing is not so confusing. At least on OTA, HD format can contain either SD material with pillars or HD, depending on what the network is providing.
  • gbrux - Tuesday, April 12, 2005 - link

    Fine piece, Anand.

    However, the real excitement is high definition TV in the Windows XP Media Center Edtion 2005.

    Last weekend, I watched on the Masters tournament in high definition from my local CBS station from my WMCE box. I have the ATI HDTV Wonder installed, and it has performed flawlessly sinced I installed it about four months ago.

    I say, buy one of the cheaper standard TV tuners that you have reviewed, and buy the ATI HDTV Wonder (at about $150 some places) to build that WMCE box.

    Incidentally, I'm going to put up a thread in the Forums with a step by step procedure for installing the ATI HDTV Wonder in a new WMCE box.

    It'll be there in about an hour.
  • creathir - Tuesday, April 12, 2005 - link

    kjohnson
    FoxNews all the way!
  • kjohnson - Tuesday, April 12, 2005 - link

    Great review. But why watch CNN? I hope that is not an indication of your ideology.
  • CigarSmokedByClinton - Tuesday, April 12, 2005 - link

    Good review, but IMO this review without the 150MCE makes it almost worthless....

    The 150MCE is at least equivalent to the 250 but comes in at $65, the low end of the price range.
  • DigitalWarrior - Tuesday, April 12, 2005 - link

    Interesting article, but it doesn't consider the Hauppauge PVR-150MCE card which only costs about $65 from pcalchemy.com (http://www.pcalchemy.com/product_info.php/cPath/21...

    According to this article (http://www.htpcnews.com/main.php?id=pvr_150_1) , Hauppauge was able to reduce the cost of the PVR-150MCE by using a new A/D chip that could handle both the audio and video conversion functions with better image quality than the PVR-250.

    I just built a HTPC using three of these PVR-150MCE tuner cards, and I couldn't be more pleased with them!
  • DigitalWarrior - Tuesday, April 12, 2005 - link

  • ranger203 - Tuesday, April 12, 2005 - link

    BTW, Great article Anand... Hard to find anyone that spends teh time to rate tv tuners. My MCE 2005 Box works great...
  • ranger203 - Tuesday, April 12, 2005 - link

    What, no PVR-150, or PVR-150MCE??? I can't tell the difference between the 150 & 250 models. And, everyone always likes price: $75 for teh MCE version...

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now