The Processor Factor

Another concern has raised its head in the last few months that should be a consideration for anyone shopping for an Athlon 64 motherboard - the processor factor. When we tested the nForce4 SLI boards we used the 4000+ clawhammer chip as our standard CPU. We also had done some testing with the early Winchester chips which were based on the 90nm production process instead of the 130nm process used for clawhammer. Overall these early 90nm chips were mainly a die-shrink, and performance - and compatability - were much the same whether clawhammer, winchester, or newcastle.

Recently, however, we have some new choices from AMD in Revision E chips and dual-core. These new Revision E parts support SSE3, are based on the 90nm process, and they do not always behave as earlier chips did in the same motherboard. We saw this for ourselves in our Gold Editor's Choice MSI K8N Neo4/SLI. While we experienced outstanding overclocking with a clawhammer chip, users with Venice chips were experiencing perfectly miserable overclocking results. It has taken MSI some time to find a solution to this problem, but we are happy to report that a new BIOS has just been released that claims to fix the Venice issues on the MSI. The point of this is that the newest Athlon64 Revision E chips, code-named Venice and San Diego, do behave differently than earlier Athlon 64 chips in some boards. This is likely a temporary concern as the market adjusts to the newest CPU architectures, but it is a factor that should be considered.


This becomes an even larger issue with the new Toledo dual-core processors. The Athlon 64 X2 joins two Venice or San Diego cores on a single CPU. These Revision E X2 dual-core CPUs - the 4200+, 4400+. 4600+, and 4800+ - theoretically will work in any Socket 939 board. However, you will certainly need at least a BIOS upgrade. Most of the major manufacturers have quickly brought the needed BIOS upgrades to market, but if you plan to run a dual-core chip you need to check before you buy.

It should also be mentioned that AMD has implemented a hidden feature in Revision E processors, namely additional memory ratios that can be implemented in BIOS. We saw a Revision E chip mounted on the Abit Fatal1ty AN8 motherboard. Adding the new processor gave the additional options of 433, 466, and 500 to the available memory ratios. This has to be coded in the BIOS to be available, but the new asynchronous ratios are a feature of the Revision E Memory Controller.

The good news, unlike the Intel dual-core, is that just about any Socket 939 motherboard can run dual-core. But you will definitely need a BIOS update and you will definitely need to check to make sure the board you are looking at has an available BIOS supporting dual-core.

Index Updating DC BIOS & Revision E Memory
Comments Locked

57 Comments

View All Comments

  • DEMO24 - Tuesday, June 28, 2005 - link

    I know someone with a venice chip, and 4 gigs of ram in a DFI SLI-dr board and hes running 1T. I dunno why yours doesn't work for you. There are specific BIOS dates in the 5/10 form for different kinds of memory. Maybe that would fix it.
  • KeithDust2000 - Tuesday, June 28, 2005 - link

    Wesley, I mean why are there no benchmarks available
    using the new capabilities? I´m very interested in that!
  • Wesley Fink - Tuesday, June 28, 2005 - link

    #24 - The FX57 is also 90mm Rev. E. We mention several times in this article that the new Rev. E memory controller adds additional asynchronous memory speeds to DDR500. This is not just a feature of FX57, but applies to all Rev. E processors including x2.

    The BIOS has to implement the new programming for the additional memory ratios to be available in BIOS.
  • KeithDust2000 - Tuesday, June 28, 2005 - link

    Hi Wesley! What´s up with the 533Mhz Memory support included in the FX-57?

    "The shift to the 90-nm SOI process also means that the FX-57 differs in some small ways from the FX-55. Originally, the FX-55 supported just DDR-400 speeds; the FX-57's memory controller now will interface with DDR-533, and has some other small improvements, Seckler said."

    http://www.extremenano.com/article/AMD+Ponders+Dua...

    No one seems to be covering that!?!
  • KeithDust2000 - Tuesday, June 28, 2005 - link

    test
  • OldDummy - Tuesday, June 28, 2005 - link

    nice article, just a good general roundup of topics. well done
  • Myrandex - Tuesday, June 28, 2005 - link

    My motherboard has X2 support but it isn't listed. It is the Giga-Byte K8N Ultra SLi. From the Giga-byte website:
    F3 2005/6/28

    Support Athlon 64x2 dual core CPU
  • Googer - Tuesday, June 28, 2005 - link

    Thanks Wes,
    I have been looking for an article like this one for little while now.
  • matthewfoley - Tuesday, June 28, 2005 - link

    supposedly there is a beta bios out for the MSI K8N neo2 Platinum that has dual core support...

    http://www.lejabeach.com/MSIK8N/7025nms19B5.zip
  • matthewfoley - Tuesday, June 28, 2005 - link

    This is an interesting thread on the nF3 dual core topic...

    http://forums.anandtech.com/messageview.aspx?catid...

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now