nForce4 Ultra Roundup: Charting the Mainstream
by Wesley Fink on July 5, 2005 10:28 PM EST- Posted in
- Motherboards
Epox 9NPA+ Ultra: Overclocking and Stress Testing
Overclocking
Front Side Bus Overclocking Testbed | |
Epox 9NPA+ | |
Processor: | Athlon 64 4000+ (2.4GHz, 1MB Cache) |
CPU Voltage: | 1.55V (default 1.50V) |
Cooling: | Thermaltake Silent Boost K8 Heatsink/Fan |
Power Supply: | OCZ Power Stream 520W |
Memory: | OCZ PC3200 EL Platinum Rev. 2 (Samsung TCCD Memory Chips) |
Hard Drive: | Seagate 120GB 7200RPM SATA 8MB Cache |
Maximum OC: (Standard Ratio) |
240x12 (Auto HT, 2-3-2-7, 1T, 2.9V) 2880MHz (+20%) |
Maximum FSB: (Lower Ratio) |
302x9 (2718MHz) (Auto HT, 2.5-4-3-7, 2.9V) (1:1 Memory, 1T, 2 DIMMs in DC mode) (+51% Bus Overclock) |
The overclocking options finally pay off on the Epox 9NPA+ Ultra, as our Reference 4000+ reached a new stock overclock of 2880MHz (240x12), a 20% overclock of the stock 2.4GHz. The Epox also did well at lower multipliers, reaching a 302x9 speed, which is a 51% overclock of the 200 bus speed. This is still a bit slower than the 318 posted by the DFI, but it placed the Epox in 2nd place for bus speed overclock in this roundup.
Memory Stress Tests
Our memory stress test confirms the ability of the Epox to operate at its officially supported memory frequency (400MHz DDR), at the lowest memory timings that OCZ PC3200 Platinum Rev. 2 modules will support. All DIMMs used for stress testing were 512MB double-sided (or double-bank) memory.Stable DDR400 Timings - One Dual-Channel (2/4 DIMMs populated) |
|
Clock Speed: | 200MHz |
CAS Latency: | 2.0 |
RAS to CAS Delay: | 2T |
RAS Precharge: | 7T |
Precharge Delay: | 2T |
Command Rate: | 1T |
Using two DIMMs in Dual-Channel 128-bit mode, the memory performed in all benchmarks at the fastest 2-2-2-7 timings, at default 2.6V voltage.
Tests with 4 DS DIMMs on an AMD Athlon 64 system are more demanding, since AMD specifies DDR333 for this combination. However, most AMD Athlon 64 motherboards combined with recent AMD processors (the memory controller is on the AMD CPU) have been able to handle 4 DIMMs at DDR400.
Stable DDR400 Timings - 4 DIMMs (4/4 DIMMs populated) |
|
Clock Speed: | 200MHz |
CAS Latency: | 2.0 |
RAS to CAS Delay: | 2T |
RAS Precharge: | 7T |
Precharge Delay: | 2T |
Command Rate: | 2T |
Tests with all four DIMM slots populated on the Epox 9NPA+ Ultra board required a 2T Command Rate with 4 DS DIMMs in two dual channels, as we have seen on other top-performing Socket 939 boards, but the memory did operate at DDR400 without any problems. We also checked memory performance with 4 DS DIMMs running a Rev. E AMD processor and found 2T Command Rate was still required with 4 DS DIMMs running with a Rev. E CPU.
75 Comments
View All Comments
lsman - Tuesday, July 5, 2005 - link
yet, "As you can see, none of the onboard audio solutions were quite as low in CPU utilization as the Creative SoundBlaster Live! Chip, which is used on the MSI K8N Neo4 Platinum."so creative on board is a reference? because you do not test the MSI K8N Neo4 platium.
Wesley Fink - Tuesday, July 5, 2005 - link
#2 -As we said several times in the roundup, we reviewed the MSI and Asus in the SLI roundup. The SLI and Ultra chipsets are exactly the same chipset with SLI enabled on the SLI chipset. We did not see what new information we could bring you by reviewing the Ultra versions fo the same boards. As you can see in the benchmarks in this roundup the DFI perfoms in Ultra exactly as it did in SLI.
The MSI was an Editor's Choice in the SLI roundup and is a similar good choice as an Ultra board. There have been some issues with the Venice and San Diego overclocking and MSI has finally released a new BIOS to address these problems.
The Asus was not a particularly good overclocker in the SLI roundup, and not an Editors Choice, but it was a decent performer at stock speeds.
Djinni - Tuesday, July 5, 2005 - link
Very good work, but I too would of liked to see the MSI K8N Neo4 Platinum in there since thats what I just bought yesterday :PMaxisOne - Tuesday, July 5, 2005 - link
Nice .. but partially useless considering the Asus A8N-E and MSI offerings are missing from the lineup which is what im looking to compare to the DFI Ultra DChrisSwede - Tuesday, July 5, 2005 - link