Quantitative Analysis

For the duration of this review, we connected the HP L2335 to a Radeon X800 Pro with factory default settings on the DVI connections unless stated otherwise. Brightness has been set to maximum as well.

Luminance

Brightness ranked as one of our most important display qualities. On a display like the L2335, a dim image can make for a very poor viewing experience, since the resolution is so high. Fortunately, large displays are usually compensated for this with the addition of larger and brighter backlights. Too much compensation will result in an overly bright image, to which black levels and contrast ratios will suffer. Below, you can see a comparison of the brightness for each of our LCD monitors.

LCD Luminance

Technically, this is the brightest display that we have seen to date, although not by much. Visually, the Dell 2005FPW and the HP L2335 look identical if it weren't for their different sizes and bezels. This bodes well for HP as the UltraSharp 2005FPW is one of the best displays that we reviewed.

Our Contrast Ratio

We will use the same observation from the 19" LCD Roundup several months ago. Using PreCal and our ColorVision Spyder, we will measure the luminance of a pure white image and a pure black image on the LCD monitor. The observed contrast ratio is simply the highest recorded luminance divided by the lowest. All measurements are in candela per meter squared; larger contrast ratios are more desirable.

Observed Contrast Ratio
Highest Recorded (white image) Lowest Recorded (black image) Observed Contrast Ratio
Apple Cinema 20" 247.4 2.4 103.1
BenQ FP931 256.4 3.6 71.2
Dell 1905FP 234.6 2.6 90.2
Dell 2005FPW 280.4 2.6 107.8
HP L2335 280.5 2.6 107.8
NuTech L921G 278.2 2.6 107.0
Planar PE191M 234.0 3.0 78.0
Samsung 193P 230.4 2.2 104.7
Samsung 910V 219.8 2.6 84.5
Sony SDM S94 233.8 3.0 77.9
ViewSonic Q190MB 261.8 2.6 100.7

Again, there is no surprise here where the HP performed the same as the Apple Cinema Display and the Dell 2005FPW. Since all three use LG.Philips LCD panels within the same generation, we had expected this. Again, note that the accuracy of our ColorVision Spyder is within 0.2 cd/m2 only, and this plagues the accuracy of our results. Our numbers should give you a good estimation of where each display falls in line with another, but it is far from an absolute authority.

User Interface Application Analysis
Comments Locked

49 Comments

View All Comments

  • araczynski - Friday, July 8, 2005 - link

    coming out of the gate late (compared to the dell 2405) and also charging more for the same thing is hardly a good way to try to compete...

    this just guarantees that dell will continue to the winner in this round.

    i mean the average consumer will see 2 of the same monitors with a $250+ price difference, hardly a decision that will take more then a few seconds to 'analyze'.

    HP needs hooked on phonics...going the way of gateway, cept gateway at least mattered at one point...
  • headbox - Friday, July 8, 2005 - link

    It is retarded when they crack open a monitor to show the insides. There's NO REASON to do it if we already know what kind of screen it has. It can't be upgraded. It can't be modified. It's just a hunk of silicon we've all seen before. Big deal.
  • Deinonych - Friday, July 8, 2005 - link

    Dell's high-end monitor line is branded UltraSharp, not UltraSync. You may wish to change these references in the article. :)
  • KristopherKubicki - Friday, July 8, 2005 - link

    BoboSama: Unfortunately I don't think any LCD could really stand up to a CRT as far as response time (since there isn't any on a CRT) or image quality (it's much higher on a CRT).

    Also keep in mind that a 21" Trinitron has about the same viewable area of a 19" or 20" LCD.

    What do you use your displays for primary? If it isn't gaming or photographic work then the LCDs reviewed today will probably be just fine.

    Kristopher
  • IdahoB - Friday, July 8, 2005 - link

    I don't get the comment in the article "but it's only been a few weeks since it broke the magic $1,000 barrier."

    I can't see it for under $1000 anywhere...
  • BoboSama - Friday, July 8, 2005 - link

    Is there anyway to benchmark this LCD against a 21" Trinitron Flat Tube CRT for image quality and other specifications? I currently have dual 21" CRT's for development and I would like to know if two of these monitors would be a suitable replacement.
  • flatblastard - Friday, July 8, 2005 - link

    #10 We should be asking you that question, since you have both of them on-hand.
  • flatblastard - Friday, July 8, 2005 - link

    ....and maybe then we'll finally have a screen technology worthy of replacing direct-view CRTs.
  • Quanticles - Friday, July 8, 2005 - link

    If you want headshots in counter-strike there's only one way to go... and those usually weight 60 lbs...

    two more years and maybe..
  • Bghead8che - Friday, July 8, 2005 - link

    I have the Dell 2405 and the HP 2335 on hand. Has Anandtech reviwed the Dell? Which one is superior for gaming and color accuracy?

    Any thoughts?

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now