Doom 3 Performance

One of the most demanding games that we test in terms of graphics, Doom 3 shows some impressive gains. Let's take a look.

Doom 3


Doom 3


Doom 3


Doom 3


We'll start by comparing the 6800 Ultra and the 7800 GT. The most notable increase here is at 2048x1536 with AA enabled, where we see a 43% improvement in fps with the 7800 GT. We get a similar increase (48.4%) at that resolution without AA enabled, but with AA, we went from 19.3 fps, an unplayable framerate, to 27.6, which is borderline-playable. At 1600x1200, both AA and no AA see only about a 14% increase.

As expected, we see higher gains than this when we compare one 6800 Ultra to two in SLI mode. Without AA, the framerates for both resolutions increase by around 30 fps, a 34% increase at 16x12, and a 77.6% increase at 20x15. The gains are even more impressive with AA enabled. 16x12 AA goes from 41.6 to 75.4, an increase of 81.3%; and at 20x15 AA, from 19.3 to 38.8 - an impressive 101% increase.

The gains that we see with the 7800 GT will definitely make a difference in performance with this game, but unfortunately, the GT still struggles at 20x15 with AA enabled. Two 6800Us in SLI mode don't have this problem, and in fact, they handle 20x15 with AA fairly well. This might not matter however, to those who don't care about AA at high resolutions.

It's interesting to note that Doom 3 appears more dependent on GPU memory bandwidth than GPU processing speed, at least in certain scenarios. Notice how the 6800 Ultra SLI configuration actually beats the 7800 GT SLI configuration in several of the tests. The 6800 cards do seem to have more problems with the 20x15 resolution, however.

Battlefield 2 Performance Everquest II Performance
Comments Locked

77 Comments

View All Comments

  • Lonyo - Thursday, August 11, 2005 - link

    The Doom 3 benchmarks seem to be 100% absent. The page is there, text is there, but no graphs.
  • neogodless - Thursday, August 11, 2005 - link

    ... the rest of the article. Besides the missing pages, the bottom half of the second page seems to be cut off.

    But... we know how frustrating being on that end of these problems can be. I wish you the best of luck in getting it fixed while still having a full head of hair (assuming you started with one!)
  • neogodless - Thursday, August 11, 2005 - link

    The test setup is still missing...
  • nastyemu25 - Thursday, August 11, 2005 - link

    hi wut
  • ss284 - Thursday, August 11, 2005 - link

    Has there recently been a problem with article posting? Ive noticed it more and more on anandtech; are these pages uploaded one at a time?
  • nastyemu25 - Thursday, August 11, 2005 - link

    more importantly, if they're uploaded one at a time then the why don't the work from the last page to the first.
  • JarredWalton - Friday, August 12, 2005 - link

    The document posting engine isn't designed to be posted last to first. Normally, articles are uploaded and then activated. Some times a mistake is made where an article goes "live" before all the pages have been uploaded.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now