Athlon 64 X2: New Memory Dividers and Multitasking Performance
by Anand Lal Shimpi on August 12, 2005 2:00 PM EST- Posted in
- CPUs
Multitasking with Adobe Photoshop CS
Intel has done a great job of putting together a number of benchmarks that put real applications in real world usage scenarios. Despite the validity of most of their benchmarks, we don’t use them in our CPU comparisons because of the fact that they are scripted by Intel. But, since we’re not doing an AMD vs. Intel comparison here today, we made use of one of them in particular - their Adobe Photoshop CS benchmark.Usually, Photoshop benchmarks consist of performing every single filter on an image and recording the time taken by each filter. Intel’s benchmark performs a bunch of filters and image manipulations much like a user would, and keeps track of the total time that the script took to complete.
First off, let’s take a look at the performance of DDR400 vs. DDR480 without anything running in the background, just Photoshop CS:
Time in Seconds (Lower is Better) | DDR400 | DDR480 |
Adobe Photoshop CS | 63.263s | 63.028s |
Although DDR480 is slightly faster than DDR400, it isn’t a tangible performance advantage (less than 1%).
But now to spice things up a bit, let’s look at Photoshop CS performance when we’re listening to a MP3 and encoding a video at the same time. For this particular test, we start up Windows Media Encoder 9 and iTunes, begin encoding our test video, then start playing our single MP3 on repeat and start the Photoshop CS script 5 seconds later.
Time in Seconds (Lower is Better) | DDR400 | DDR480 |
Adobe Photoshop CS + MP3 + WME9 | 105.773s | 98.851s |
The end result is far more tangible this time around, with DDR480 completing the Photoshop task in 6.5% less time than the same system with DDR400.
We used our Windows Media Encoder test here because in our original article, the WME test itself saw no benefit from DDR480, much like Photoshop CS. But putting the two together and tossing in some background music changed the picture; it changed things enough that we’d actually recommend using higher bandwidth memory in this case.
23 Comments
View All Comments
Anand Lal Shimpi - Friday, August 12, 2005 - link
DDR480 is the fastest speed you can run on the Athlon 64 X2 4800+ on the DFI board using the new dividers. DDR500 is possible on the Athlon 64 X2 3800+.Take care,
Anand
Diasper - Friday, August 12, 2005 - link
Also, a further point might be to examine how running 4 x 512MB sticks at 2T might affect things - I guess we can say the bandiwidth loss of running it at 2T will affect performance significantly so compared to someone running DDR500 @1T with decent timings.Diasper - Friday, August 12, 2005 - link
Moreover, I guess AMD's move to DDR2 does begin to make sense as when both cores are fully taxed that bandwidth will be needed.DDR2 is set to get cheaper while timings are also tightening
eg Corsair's new 512MB sticks that are rated at 3-2-2 675mhz stuff and have been o/c to around 709mhz or their 1GB sticks which are doing 3-3-3 at DDR533 (http://www.hothardware.com/viewarticle.cfm?page=4&...">http://www.hothardware.com/viewarticle.cfm?page=4&...
In short it seems that DDR2 is getting much closer performancewise to DDR but offers guaranteed bandwidth which X2 can clearly benefit from. 1GB modules that do DDR500 are few and expensive whereas while that's still true of DDR2 now, DDR2 is still being developed where we will see future refinements providing lower latencies/higher speeds at an increasingly affordable price point - DDR is no longer being developed while it is feasible that DDR and especially premium sticks might get more expensive as the market slowly shrinks.
In all, AMD have probably picked a rather opportune time to migrate to DDR2.