Seagate 120GB External Storage
by Purav Sanghani on September 29, 2005 12:05 AM EST- Posted in
- Storage
Real World Tests – File System Performance (cont’d)
File Zip Operations
Here, we see a greater difference in performance as the Seagate drive performs the File Zip operations one to two seconds quicker than the USB interface of the E5. Though this is not saying much, the difference does exist.
File UnZip Operations
The E5 performs the same across our File Unzip tests, unzipping both sizes of volume in 14-16 seconds.
File Zip Operations
| File Zip – One 300MB File, seconds, lower is better | ||
| Within Drive | To Drive (From SATA) | |
| AcomData E5 320GB (USB) | 69.195 | 70.734 |
| AcomData E5 320GB (FireWire 400) | 67.219 | 67.586 |
| Seagate 120GB USB | 67.688 | 67.443 |
| File Zip – Three Hundred 1MB Files, seconds, lower is better | ||
| Within Drive | To Drive (From SATA) | |
| AcomData E5 320GB (USB) | 71.775 | 71.621 |
| AcomData E5 320GB (FireWire 400) | 70.583 | 70.620 |
| Seagate 120GB USB | 68.906 | 70.805 |
Here, we see a greater difference in performance as the Seagate drive performs the File Zip operations one to two seconds quicker than the USB interface of the E5. Though this is not saying much, the difference does exist.
File UnZip Operations
| File Unzip – One 300MB File, seconds, lower is better | ||
| Within Drive | To Drive (From SATA) | |
| AcomData E5 320GB (USB) | 15.761 | 15.699 |
| AcomData E5 320GB (FireWire 400) | 14.427 | 14.401 |
| Seagate 120GB USB | 15.476 | 15.485 |
| File Unzip – Three Hundred 1MB Files, seconds, lower is better | ||
| Within Drive | To Drive (From SATA) | |
| AcomData E5 320GB (USB) | 16.196 | 16.008 |
| AcomData E5 320GB (FireWire 400) | 14.901 | 14.995 |
| Seagate 120GB USB | 15.664 | 15.618 |
The E5 performs the same across our File Unzip tests, unzipping both sizes of volume in 14-16 seconds.
Facebook
Twitter
RSS
14 Comments
View All Comments
foot167 - Thursday, September 29, 2005 - link
I just returned the 300GB model today after 3 weeks of use. Everything I read about them said they were terrible but I had to give them a shot anyway. Sometimes my computer wouldn't recognize the drive. it would say no drive there. then on monday the drive decided that it was unformatted and needed to be reformatted. good thing that i kept a copy of everything i put on the external on my internal drives.the 300gb one can be had for under $200 and even less after rebates.
How about some reliability tests on these drives. Does the firewire/usb interface affect the reliability of these drives? Are they prone to crashing for some reason?
ScottyDog - Friday, September 30, 2005 - link
I agree with your comments about reliability with these external drives. I have one and have the same problems with the disk suddenly becoming "unformatted". I have done a google search and this is a huge problem with these external USB or Firewire chipsets whether they are are the Oxford or Prolific flavors.Somebody really needs to do an article about what is going on here as I have resorted to leaving my drive off unless I am doing a backup and then need to restore otherwise all my data gets destroyed.
I originally thought it might be due to write caching and changing it to safe mode but it makes no difference with mine. If I leave it on eventually it becomes "Unformatted".
type this into google and you will see this is a wide spread problem with these external drives: windows delayed write failure
Googer - Thursday, September 29, 2005 - link
Dosen't it have 1394? I won't buy an External HDD with out 1394a and/or 1394b.MASCARNHAS - Monday, June 21, 2010 - link
I've used Report and although its great, I've had better luck with WheresTheFreeSpace. It is Modeled after a PC application that is very popular called <a href="http://www.wheresthefreespace.com">Treesiz... (but its for Mac).</a>