DFI LANParty UT RDX200: ATI’s Crossfire AMD for the Bleeding Edge
by Wesley Fink on October 18, 2005 11:03 AM EST- Posted in
- Motherboards
Overclocking
Maximum overclock data was added to our Performance graphs beginning with the nForce4 SLI roundup several months ago. The overclocking performance graphs allow a better comparison of the overclocking capabilities of tested boards. For more details on the specific overclocking abilities of a specific board, please refer to the Overclocking and Memory Stress Test section of individual board reviews.
305 at lower multipliers is not the highest value that we have reached in past testing, but it does place the DFI in the company of the few excellent overclocking Athlon 64 boards that have managed to reach a stable 50% or better frequency overclock (300) at lower ratios. It is also a very acceptable compromise that was required for the 4DS 1T option at DDR400.
As we have commented before, ATI has made tremendous progress in board design, since we looked at the initial Bullhead board last November. DFI definitely incorporated many of the best things about the ATI Crossfire Reference Design while still marking the RDX200 with their own unique stamp.
Maximum overclock data was added to our Performance graphs beginning with the nForce4 SLI roundup several months ago. The overclocking performance graphs allow a better comparison of the overclocking capabilities of tested boards. For more details on the specific overclocking abilities of a specific board, please refer to the Overclocking and Memory Stress Test section of individual board reviews.
305 at lower multipliers is not the highest value that we have reached in past testing, but it does place the DFI in the company of the few excellent overclocking Athlon 64 boards that have managed to reach a stable 50% or better frequency overclock (300) at lower ratios. It is also a very acceptable compromise that was required for the 4DS 1T option at DDR400.
As we have commented before, ATI has made tremendous progress in board design, since we looked at the initial Bullhead board last November. DFI definitely incorporated many of the best things about the ATI Crossfire Reference Design while still marking the RDX200 with their own unique stamp.
Facebook
Twitter
RSS
48 Comments
View All Comments
JarredWalton - Tuesday, October 18, 2005 - link
SATA2 actually only increases the bandwidth from 1.5Gbps to 3.0Gbps. Since sustained transfer rates are still maxing out at around 100MBps (0.8Gbps), and that's only with RAID-0 and two drives... well, SATA2 isn't a huge deal. I don't recall seeing whether the ATI chipset supports NCQ, which is of course in a similar boat.USB2.0 performance is only really important if you use an external HDD. Most flash cards and other USB2.0 devices don't come anywhere near 60MBps, as Anand's USB Flash Drive article showed. USB2.0 video devices might also have trouble, though - not sure what the throughput on those is. 150Mbps should be enough, really. Isn't 1080i only a 20Mbps stream? (Or is it 20MBps?)
haelduksf - Wednesday, October 19, 2005 - link
Err...that's what I meant, 3 Gbps, not 300Mbps. in either case, it's quite useless, and will be for the forseeable future.erinlegault - Tuesday, October 18, 2005 - link
I would have been nice if DFI would have used the ULI southbridge. Maybe DFI will include the ULI M1575 for the DFI LANParty UT RDX200 Expert motherboard (that's if they do the same as they've done with the NF4 board).DigitalFreak - Tuesday, October 18, 2005 - link
Anyone else think this board is a bit lacking feature wise for the $230 asking price? If you REALLY want Crossfire, then you'll need this board. Otherwise, the Nforce4 seems to be the better choice. I just can't believe that DFI is asking so much $$$ for this!mongoosesRawesome - Tuesday, October 18, 2005 - link
price will likely come down pretty quickly. remember how much the nforce 4 sli boards were when they came out?I've also heard rumors that DFI is going to release a new board with an updated southbridge in a few weeks.
bob661 - Tuesday, October 18, 2005 - link
Only if people buy these things otherwise there would be no reason to lower prices.coomar - Tuesday, October 18, 2005 - link
226-2-2-2-7-2T is going to be faster than 206-2-2-2-7-1Tvdimm and vcore voltage choices were very impressive
how good is azalia compared to good soundcards/ decoders?
muffin - Tuesday, October 18, 2005 - link
DFI was not the first! EQS have had a board on sale at overclock.co.uk for a couple of weeks now. Its the same as the (as yet unreleased) Sapphire board, made by the same people.Linky: http://www.overclock.co.uk/customer/product.php?pr...">http://www.overclock.co.uk/customer/product.php?pr...
Its been on sale for a while guys, pay attention. Theres an Inquirer story about it too :/
erinlegault - Tuesday, October 18, 2005 - link
There is data for x850XT missing in the Half-Life 2, Wolfenstein, Aquamark and UT2004Wesley Fink - Tuesday, October 18, 2005 - link
Due to time constraints we did not run a full set of Crossfire benchmarks. We were mainly trying to confirm Crossfire worked as it should on the DFI. We therefore ran those benches where more powerful video makes a difference and left out those where the video power makes little difference. You can find a full suite of Crossfire, 7800GTX, and other graphics benchches in our Crossfire Graphics launch reviews under the Video tab at the top of the page.We did intend to run Half Life 2 but our benchmarks no longer work with the new build Steam forces on you. We are in the process of updating the HL2 benchmark unless some of you tech wizards know of an HL2 benchmark that will definitely work with the new HL2 version.