Asus A8N32-SLI Deluxe: NVIDIA Dual x16 for the Athlon 64
by Wesley Fink on November 6, 2005 9:00 AM EST- Posted in
- Motherboards
Last week, we took a close look at the Asus P5N32-SLI Deluxe, a new Intel motherboard based on NVIDIA's vision of the enthusiast chipset - the dual x16 SLI. With 8-phase power, passive heat-pipe cooling and two full x16 PCIe video slots, the Intel version had the goods to grab our attention. Perhaps even more important, we also found the performance among the best ever tested on the Intel Socket 775. Following that announcement, Asus has introduced an AMD version that should have even broader enthusiast interest - the Asus A8N32-SLI Deluxe.
With essentially the same features on an AMD Socket 939 platform, Asus is targeting the majority of gamers with the A8N32-SLI Deluxe. With AMD in the clear lead in gaming performance, most gamers these days are running Athlon 64 processors. The question in many minds is whether this all-decked out A8N32-SLI Deluxe has what it takes to attract that market. Can this Asus effectively compete with the DFI LANParty nForce4 boards that seem to have a firm grip on the enthusiast-buying dollars? These are not trivial questions given the less-than stellar performance that we have recently seen in Athlon 64 motherboards from Asus.
We all know that Asus has historically done a wonderful job in bringing to market some of the most innovative and highest-performing Intel motherboards that the market has ever seen. However, the AMD side, and in particular the nForce 4 market, has been more a challenge to Asus. We found their original A8N-SLI Deluxe to be a very average performer in our nForce4 SLI roundup, a very atypical position for Asus. The good news recently is that the newest A8N-SLI Premium performed very well in our initial enthusiast testing, even with the potentially performance-robbing auto-switching SLI. This A8N32-SLI Premium uses many of the same features as the Premium, so we have reason to expect that this might be just the board to compete with the DFI LANParty nForce4 SLI.
We cannot go forward in reviewing the A8N32-SLI Deluxe without first addressing some of the completely incorrect hype that has developed about this board from early reviews by some review sites. We have seen a review that claimed the Asus A8N32-SLI Deluxe to be 40% to 50% faster in some games than the current dual x8 SLI boards. Frankly, that information is based on an incorrect interpretation of performance data. Asus and NVIDIA strongly recommend that this board be tested with the latest released 81.85 video drivers and the 6.82 platform drivers. Using these recommended drivers, we also found dramatic increases in performance of the A8N32-SLI compared to past benchmarks on nForce4 SLI boards. However, we delayed the review to go back and retest the well-regarded DFI LANParty nF4 SLI-DR motherboard with the new video drivers. We found that the biggest part of the performance boost is not the dual x16 architecture, but the new video drivers.
So, is dual x16 SLI really better with current hardware and the latest games? Or is it all just smoke and mirrors? Join us as we take a closer look at the Asus A8N32-SLI Deluxe in our standard motherboard tests, and new game tests with F.E.A.R., Splinter Cell-Chaos Theory, and Quake 4.
With essentially the same features on an AMD Socket 939 platform, Asus is targeting the majority of gamers with the A8N32-SLI Deluxe. With AMD in the clear lead in gaming performance, most gamers these days are running Athlon 64 processors. The question in many minds is whether this all-decked out A8N32-SLI Deluxe has what it takes to attract that market. Can this Asus effectively compete with the DFI LANParty nForce4 boards that seem to have a firm grip on the enthusiast-buying dollars? These are not trivial questions given the less-than stellar performance that we have recently seen in Athlon 64 motherboards from Asus.
We all know that Asus has historically done a wonderful job in bringing to market some of the most innovative and highest-performing Intel motherboards that the market has ever seen. However, the AMD side, and in particular the nForce 4 market, has been more a challenge to Asus. We found their original A8N-SLI Deluxe to be a very average performer in our nForce4 SLI roundup, a very atypical position for Asus. The good news recently is that the newest A8N-SLI Premium performed very well in our initial enthusiast testing, even with the potentially performance-robbing auto-switching SLI. This A8N32-SLI Premium uses many of the same features as the Premium, so we have reason to expect that this might be just the board to compete with the DFI LANParty nForce4 SLI.
We cannot go forward in reviewing the A8N32-SLI Deluxe without first addressing some of the completely incorrect hype that has developed about this board from early reviews by some review sites. We have seen a review that claimed the Asus A8N32-SLI Deluxe to be 40% to 50% faster in some games than the current dual x8 SLI boards. Frankly, that information is based on an incorrect interpretation of performance data. Asus and NVIDIA strongly recommend that this board be tested with the latest released 81.85 video drivers and the 6.82 platform drivers. Using these recommended drivers, we also found dramatic increases in performance of the A8N32-SLI compared to past benchmarks on nForce4 SLI boards. However, we delayed the review to go back and retest the well-regarded DFI LANParty nF4 SLI-DR motherboard with the new video drivers. We found that the biggest part of the performance boost is not the dual x16 architecture, but the new video drivers.
So, is dual x16 SLI really better with current hardware and the latest games? Or is it all just smoke and mirrors? Join us as we take a closer look at the Asus A8N32-SLI Deluxe in our standard motherboard tests, and new game tests with F.E.A.R., Splinter Cell-Chaos Theory, and Quake 4.
Facebook
Twitter
RSS
95 Comments
View All Comments
Wesley Fink - Friday, November 4, 2005 - link
We did not test with an XP90 or XP120. What I can tell you is the fan on our Thermaltake heatsink (in the picture of the optional HS fan in the review) is an 80mm. I just measured and there is still an additional 1/2" clearnance to theheatsink and heatpipes on the IO and bottom sides and an additional 1" to the heatsink at the top of the socket. My guess based on these measurements is that an XP90 should be fine, but I'm not sure about an XP120.Rike - Friday, November 4, 2005 - link
Regarding the HS, is it just me or is there a lot of dust in the fins?Peldor - Friday, November 4, 2005 - link
I don't think you should be ripping on "other" sites for claiming x16 lane SLI has big benefits over x8, when http://www.anandtech.com/mb/showdoc.aspx?i=2580&am...">Anandtech showed the same thing on a P4 board. You certainly didn't make it clear in that article that the 81.85 drivers were the primary reason for the higher scores.wbloon - Sunday, December 18, 2005 - link
Yes they did, you must have only skimmed the article. Go back and do your homework before showing your lassitude, dude.Gary Key - Friday, November 4, 2005 - link
I think the Intel article was very clear about indicating several factors played into the results we witnessed-This topic has been discussed greatly in the comments section of the Intel article. I also stated in the game section the base improvement of the Asus board over the MSI board was 3% on average. I attribute this to bios optimizations, board design, and possibly improvements in the A3 stepping of the C19 Northbridge. The difference we found between the boards utilizing a very GPU intensive game (F.E.A.R.) ran from 6% to almost 11% indicating in this particular game an advantage/optimizations of the x16SLI over the X8SLI. The difference in going from 11% to 25% when implementing AA/AF is probably 90%+ due to the 81.85 driver set in my opinion. After statements from several readers I further clarified my statement on this increase in the article. However, I firmly believe with the right GPU setup and application there is a true improvement due to the additional bandwidth with the x16SLI.
You cannot directly compare the Intel and AMD board due to the differences in the Northbridge chipset (C19 vs CK51) and the fact the memory controller is integrated in the Intel Northbridge instead of on the CPU in AMD's case. Wesley noticed differences in the single card benchmarks of up to 17% where mine were within the reported differences between the board designs (we will also test with a single core P4EE which should reduce the cpu bottleneck on the Intel board at higher resolutions). I have additional x8sli boards at this time and a revised bios for the MSI P4N that will be tested for a mini-update on this subject. We should see additional x16SLI boards in December for head to head tests utilizing the same chipset.
Also, not all games or applications showed this type of increase as stated. We had some issues with the BF2 SLI benchmarks but should have those worked out shortly but I imagine this will be one game that also benefits directly from the x16SLI setup.
Thank you. :)
Wesley Fink - Friday, November 4, 2005 - link
There is a BIG difference between 0% to 8% SLI performance improvement and the 40% to 50% claimed in one review we saw. We thought it would be unprofessional to "name names", but with all the hype that 40% to 50% claim generated in many Forums we needed to address the facts head on.Our video review team plans an article looking at the performance increases in both the new nVidia and ATI drivers in an upcoming article. We have seen results on the newest games on this Asus with 81.85 as much as 40% higher than other nF4 boards tested with 78.01. However, most of that was drivers since we could only find increases of 0% to 8% in SLI and 0% to 17% in single 7800GTX. These are significant, but they aren't a 50% increase.
Hanners - Friday, November 4, 2005 - link
Except, unlike the site I believe you are thinking of, you haven't done any testing (that I can see) using SLI AA, which is the one feature of NVIDIA's SLI feature set that will benefit greatly from the availability of two 'true' 16x PCI Express slots, as it transfers data via the PCI Express bus rather than using the inter-GPU connector as per other SLI modes.Wesley Fink - Friday, November 4, 2005 - link
You are correct that we did not select 8X or 16X AA in the nVidia driver, which I believe is the feature you are talking about. We selected anti-aliasing in the game, as we have in the past with our testing. We are looking into the possible impact of the "in-driver" AA on test results.Wesley Fink - Friday, November 4, 2005 - link
ALL of our game tests are 4XAA and 8XAF where that can be set - both SLI and single video. All game tests were run at 1600x1200. Please read the title bars and the Test Setup. This is clearly spelled out in the review.Leper Messiah - Friday, November 4, 2005 - link
oooh. I have my NF4 mobo. This thing is bought as soon as I see one in stock...