Hard Disk Performance: PCMark 2005

We introduce PCMark 2005 into our hard disk benchmark suite. We utilize HDD test suite within the program. The program utilizes the RankDisk application within the Intel iPEAK SPT suite of tools to record a trace of disk activity during usage of real world applications. These traces can then be replayed to generate performance measurements based upon the actual disk operations within the application. The HDD test suite contains 53% read and 47% write operations with each trace section utilizing varied amounts of read or write operations. Additional information about the test suite can be found in PDF format here.

Our test results are based upon the following trace runs:

Windows XP Startup: This test consists of 90% reading and 10% writes that tracks XP activities at start-up.

Application Loading: This test consists of 83% reading and 17% writes that tracks the opening and closing of the following programs.
  • Microsoft Word
  • Adobe Acrobat Reader
  • Windows Media Player
  • 3Dmark 2001SE
  • Leadtek Winfast DVD
  • Mozilla Internet Browser
General Hard Disk Drive Usage: This test consists of 60% reading and 40% writes that tracks application usage utilizing the following settings.
  • Opening a Microsoft Word document, performing grammar check, saving and closing
  • Compression and decompression using Winzip
  • Encrypting and decrypting a file using PowerCrypt
  • Scanning files for viruses using F-Secure Antivirus
  • Playing an MP3 file with Winamp
  • Playing a WAV file with Winamp
  • Playing a DivX video using DivX codec and Windows Media Player
  • Playing a WMV video file using Windows Media Player
  • Viewing pictures using Windows Picture Viewer
  • Browsing the Internet using Microsoft Internet Explorer
  • Loading, playing and exiting a game with Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon
Virus Scanning: This test consists of 99.5% read operations as the test tracks the scanning activities of 600MB of files for viruses.

File Write: This test consists of 100% write activities by writing 680MB of files onto the hard disk.

Hard Drive Performance - PCMark 2005

Hard Drive Performance - PCMark 2005

Hard Drive Performance - PCMark 2005

Hard Drive Performance - PCMark 2005

Hard Drive Performance - PCMark 2005

Hard Drive Performance - PCMark 2005

The WD1500 leads the WD740GD by 11% in the total suite score and the Samsung SP2504C by 40%. While the Samsung drive posts very good write numbers, it is unable to match the read performance of the Raptors; but, once again, leads the Maxtor drive. The effect of enabling NCQ on the WD1500 results in a 2% drop in the overall score and 9% in the read intensive Virus Scanning benchmark.

Hard Disk Performance: Everest 2.50 / HD Tach Hard Disk Performance: Single Application Tests
Comments Locked

51 Comments

View All Comments

  • Gary Key - Wednesday, February 8, 2006 - link

    Believe me, Purav cannot wait to start testing this drive in a RAID setup.
  • feraltoad - Wednesday, February 8, 2006 - link

    It would be great if you could include a comparison of the all 3 raptors in Raid 0. I have a 36gb Raptor and have often wondered if 2 in raid 0 would be as fast as 1 74gb raptor. Esp. now w/newer versions.
  • Rapsven - Wednesday, February 8, 2006 - link

    The content was very informative, and as a whole, the article was very well done. But jesus christ, dude, opening your articles with quotes ticks me off to no end.
  • rjm55 - Wednesday, February 8, 2006 - link

    Perhaps the quotes at the front of Gary's reviews will give you a repetoire that will include words that can be substituted for Dude. If you hate the quote just skip the first few sentences and you will not have to be bothered by the quotes.

    Personally I like them - the quotes set the reviews apart. It's sometimes nice to have a little education with my favorite hobby.
  • Gary Key - Wednesday, February 8, 2006 - link

    quote:

    The content was very informative, and as a whole, the article was very well done. But jesus christ, dude, opening your articles with quotes ticks me off to no end.


    Is it the quote itself or just the fact there is one? I would appreciate some honest feedback on the subject. I like the quote as it sets the tone for the article but I also realize it really is not needed. :-)
  • Rolphus - Thursday, February 9, 2006 - link

    I love the quotes. In particular, this one stuck in my mind, and provided an incredibly simple, single-sentence "hook" into the review which summed it up perfectly. I'd vote to keep them.
  • johnsonx - Wednesday, February 8, 2006 - link

    I like the quotes. It makes me think of Chairman Kaga on Iron Chef (the original Japanese show, not the new Iron Chef America).

    Seriously Gary, keep the quotes.
  • fb0252 - Wednesday, February 8, 2006 - link

    newbie q: the review uses the term "single user" recommending turning off native command queing in single user setting as opposed to multi user. i have a pair of wd1500s on my floor ready to be installed in our office system in Raid 0. One person at a time uses the computer but we frequently "multi-ask". do we turn of NCQ to get faster speeds in this sitaution--am I a "single user" on this computer, though much of our use is multi-asking--six programs at once e.g. doing multiple tasks.
  • Gary Key - Wednesday, February 8, 2006 - link

    Hi,
    I am assuming your applications will be general office and the machine is not being setup as a local server. If so, turn off NCQ. It it really meant at the server-level where you have highly random and concurrent requests. I would not go with RAID 0 for an office environment as you are playing with fire in regards to data reliability. Setup you system in RAID 10 if it supports it.

    Thanks....
  • Gary Key - Wednesday, February 8, 2006 - link

    We need an edit function. "Setup your system in RAID 10 if it supports it."

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now