Other Potential Uses

We've already mentioned the fact that this system is rather limited in terms of expansion opportunities. However, that doesn't mean that you can't expand it at all. If you're looking for gaming support, there's really not much that you can do, since the integrated graphics are far from adequate - unless your idea of gaming is Solitaire and Minesweeper, in which case, the MiniPC will work great! (3D games from 5 or so years back also run fine, if you want to replay some classics.) So, what else can you do to improve this device?

One area that seems like a good fit would be to use it as an HTPC. The CPU is generally fast enough, the DVI port works well with HDTVs that have DVI connections - and component output is available for any other HDTVs - but there are a couple of areas that are lacking. First, there's no way to capture video with the basic configuration, and second, the audio output is limited to stereo speakers. Both of those shortcomings limit the HTPC potential, but can you work around them? The answer is "yes", but it will of course cost some money.

First, we'll start with the audio aspect. There are quite a few USB audio devices on the market today, including a couple Audigy 2 products from Creative. In a rather odd twist, you may find that the external USB audio devices are almost as large as the MiniPC! So, if you demand more than stereo audio, you'll need to get a USB audio device. As we said earlier, it would have been nice for AOpen to add one more audio port on the rear, enabling the already present 5.1 audio support, but they didn't. S/PDIF would have been useful for connecting to a home theater sound system as well. Anyway, external USB audio is actually not a terrible way to go, as placing the audio logic outside of your computer can avoid a lot of interference and noise problems. There are audiophiles that use USB audio for just that reason, and while gaming performance isn't terribly good for USB devices (due to the latency and jitter associated with the USB bus), the sound quality for audio and movies will usually match most PCI card solutions. Besides, gaming shouldn't be a concern with the MiniPC.

Now, let's look at video capture. You can find a decent number of USB based TV tuners now, so as long as you get a USB port replicator, you should be fine. AOpen even recommends a couple of USB TV Tuner cards in their manual, though the listed brand (NewSoft) wasn't one that I recognized and seemed to be intended more for OEMs than end users. HDTV capture is going to be more difficult, as there aren't many products on the market that will do HDTV capture over USB. However, you may not even need to worry about a TV capture device.

The MiniPC does come with a Firewire port, so if you have a cable or satellite box with a Firewire port, you can jump through some hoops to get that configured as a video capture device. When we say "jump through some hoops", though, we really mean that. Getting Firewire video capture to work with my Comcast cable box (a Motorola 6200) took only a small amount of effort, as following several of the online guides that cover the topic worked. Others with similar hardware have not been so lucky, and the cable/satellite provider as well as their chosen set-top box (STB) is going to determine, to a large extent, whether or not you succeed with Firewire TV capture.

For my part, I just went with the instructions in this thread at the AV Science Forum, and it worked like a charm. Using CAPDVHS, recordings can be scheduled, though you can only record the channel to which the STB is tuned. (You may have to search for additional software to get your PC to tune your STB - I haven't tried that yet, as I haven't really had a need.)

(Note: If you use that link, please be courteous and do some research before posting questions. Chances are good that someone has already posted a similar thread, and forum etiquette is that you should at least spend some time searching and reading before starting a new "HELP ME!" thread. But I digress...)

If the Firewire option works out, the capture quality is very good - it looks just like what your set-top box would output to the TV, since it's simply capturing a digital AV stream. You don't get encrypted channels, but that's how things are supposed to work from the content provider perspective. You may also miss out on analog channels, though that appears to vary by STB (it worked for me, though there were small hiccups in the audio and video at times). Given that you can get all this for the price of a Firewire cable - about $20 online for a 6 foot cable - it's definitely something to look into. Unfortunately, your experience may vary as not every STB works well, and not all content providers fully support what you need. Besides, you're spending $10 a month for the STB already, so you can't eliminate the rental fees like you can with a regular TV tuner solution.

As for the MiniPC, live output of 1080i and 720p content using VLC (download here) used about 60% of the CPU power, as did playback of recorded HDTV content. The only issue was with interlacing present on 1080i content, which can be solved in a couple of ways.

VLC has several options for deinterlacing, with the "X" algorithm being the best. Unfortunately, the X algorithm (diagonal averaging) struggles on the MiniPC, maxing out the CPU and still dropping about half of the frames. Linear mean was similar in CPU demands. Most of the other algorithms offered work at 80% or lower CPU usage, including the traditional Bob, Weave, and Blend modes. The "average" algorithm produced a generally pleasing result, though it's certainly not as good as some of the more refined algorithms. Media Player Classic also has support for the basic deinterlacing algorithms (Bob, Weave, and Blend).

Another option is to use the NVIDIA PureVideo decoder - and despite the name and source, it works with the Intel IGPs as well as ATI cards. CPU load is once again around 80%, and you have to pay $20 if you want to use it past the 30-day trial period.

Note that HDTV files get rather large, averaging 7GB per hour of HD content. On the other hand, watching the 2006 Winter Olympics using only the MiniPC (with a networked PC providing additional storage space) was far more pleasurable than trying to watch it "live". One other note is that CAPDVHS files were rather choosy in how they would run; some would play in VLC, while others wouldn't; those that wouldn't would usually play in Media Player Classic, but not always; the final option was to try Media Player 10, and between those three programs, every CAPDVHS file worked fine. It may have simply been a codec issue, but it's something to keep in mind if you try Firewire capture and have issues.

Anand did some similar tests back when he looked at the Mac Mini, and his results were quite a bit different. Capturing content seemed to be a bit easier (though likely that's simply a matter of finding the right software for the task). However, playing back the recorded MPEG-2 transport was too much for the Mac Mini at the time. He noted, " The end result is that anything above a 13Mbps stream ends up dropping frames on the 1.25GHz Mac mini, meaning that basically all HD streams are unplayable on the mini even though they record fine. " That's definitely an advantage that the AOpen MiniPC holds over the Mac Mini, though with the recent launch of the Intel-based Mac Minis, that advantage is going to be short-lived.

There are naturally other ways to use such a small box. You could mount it in a wall next to a plasma or LCD display, with only the front panel visible. One use that some people are already taking advantage of is the ability to use the MiniPC as a car A/V unit, and considering the power and flexibility available it will definitely work well in that role. You can also find other peripherals to help out. Basically, anything that can be done with USB ports (i.e. connecting a printer) is possible. Realistically, though, you probably won't be looking to add a ton of external devices. What's the point of getting a super small PC if you're just going to connect a bunch of other bulky peripherals?

[Thanks to nvmarino for pointing out a few of the relevant links for getting Firewire recording from a Cable STB to work!]

Power Usage and Noise Levels Price, Availability, and Alternatives
Comments Locked

54 Comments

View All Comments

  • Questar - Friday, March 3, 2006 - link

    Where else in the x86 market is Apple not price competetive?
  • rowcroft - Friday, March 3, 2006 - link

    Considering it's Friday, the new Mac Mini's were announced on Tuesday (one is on a FedEx truck on it's way to my house) the article really shouldn't have the errors that it does. You can certainly tell Anand didn't write this one....
  • JarredWalton - Friday, March 3, 2006 - link

    There are a couple places where I mention the fact that this has already been superceded by the new Mac Mini. Considering this product is less than two months old (and really only 1 month in the US), the choice is either to not review it at all or to review it and basically end up with "nice, but unless you're a die-hard Windows user the Mac Mini is better." If it wasn't clear that I think that the Mac Mini is the better choice, I apologize. However, for people dead set on XP, until the MP945 is launched you really don't have any other option that uses a Pentium M chip. The only factual error right now (that is corrected) is that a USB X-Fi doesn't exist, unless you've spotted something else?
  • rowcroft - Saturday, March 4, 2006 - link

    I was referring to comments about i386 macs not yet shipping on the first page and overall sense that there the comparable mini's are the one's released a year ago now. I was a bit too harsh though, I apologize for that.

  • JarredWalton - Saturday, March 4, 2006 - link

    Oh... heh. That intro page was written a couple weeks ago, then the article got delayed as I waited for some answers and other information. I'll change it to the present tense instead of future tense. Of course, we're still waiting for a "Windows on Intel Macs" solution. I'm betting Vista will be necessary, as I don't know if it's even feasible to get XP runnign on an EFI architecture without massive effort. (First person to prove me wrong gets a pretty sizeable check, I suppose.)
  • Nocturnal - Friday, March 3, 2006 - link

    I have worked with many laptops and this unit doesn't look that much different from the pictures although the pictures are probably a little bigger than the actual unit (I think?). Other than that, I'd definately invest in one of these for the wife.
  • themelon - Friday, March 3, 2006 - link

    There are quite a few USB audio devices on the market today, including an X-Fi product from Creative.

    They have a USB X-Fi? It's not on there product page and this is the first time that I have seen mention of one.
  • JarredWalton - Friday, March 3, 2006 - link

    Right you are. I could have sworn I saw a Creative X-Fi USB, but I'm clearly mistaken. The best Creative USB option is still the Audigy 2 NX (right?). I will fix this error.
  • psychobriggsy - Friday, March 3, 2006 - link

    Pointless unless you have a Windows based application that you need to use.

    And for the uses this type of system will be good for, there aren't many of those.

    If you want a small system, then the Mac Mini is clearly the better choice, and will be cheaper to boot. AOpen really need to trim their prices when they release their more-equivalent update.

    There is still the issue of the market size for a computer this small. In home entertainment systems you have the option of creating a system as large as your standard HiFi separate. Elsewhere the large box can be stuck under the desk. However it is ideal as a zero-configuration computer, one that you'll use until it dies or you replace it.

    It feels really odd writing 'Macs are cheaper and better' ...
  • Hikari - Friday, March 3, 2006 - link

    Page two says, "Open has cloned the original Mac Mini with a system that is going to be faster in nearly every area."

    How old is this review? This isn't even close to as fast as a Mac mini with a Core Duo in it and 945G chipset. You just might want ot make sure you're making it clear that its slower than the old G4-based mini.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now