MSI: SLI Plus Eight

by Gary Key on April 11, 2006 8:00 AM EST
Audio Performance





We limited audio testing to the Rightmark 3D Sound version 2.2 CPU utilization test and tested with sound enabled to show the performance effects on several games. The Rightmark 3D Sound benchmark measures the overhead or CPU utilization required by a codec or hardware audio chip.

The Realtek HD audio codec family was tested with the recently released 1.34 driver set and the Realtek AC97 codecs with the 3.84 driver set. We tested the Sound Blaster Audigy SE with the 5.12.1.519 driver set. The Realtek HD DirectSound audio drivers do not support more than 32 hardware buffers and the OpenAL 1.1 drivers do not support more than 30 hardware buffers at this time so the scores cannot be directly compared to the Creative Labs Sound Blaster X-FI and Sound Blaster Audigy SE in the benchmarks.

Although Creative Labs is marketing the CA0106-DAT codec as a Sound Blaster Audigy SE, it is actually the same chipset used in the Sound Blaster Live! 24-bit family of products. The CA0106-DAT is paired with the excellent Wolfson WM8775 ADC and Cirus Logic CS4382 DAC to provide 8-channel audio capability, 100dB SNR rating, and 24-bit/96KHz operation. This combination fully supports EAX 1/2/3 and OpenAL 1.1 but did not provide EAX3 (HD) positional audio via hardware in our testing.

Audio Performance - Empty CPU - 32 Buffers


Audio Performance - 2d Audio - 32 Buffers


Audio Performance - DirectSound 3D HW - 32 Buffers


Audio Performance - DirectSound 3D EAX2 - 32 Buffers


The Sound Blaster Audigy SE codec offers competitive CPU utilization rates when compared to the Realtek series of codecs. The SB Audigy SE generates better gaming audio quality than the Realtek ALC-882 based systems and similar DVD/music audio quality. In our subjective headphone testing we noticed differences between the two codecs, with the output from the ALC-882 sounding cleaner in the mid-range tones with deeper bass in the music and DVD movie playback tests while ambient sounds and positioning in the games tests clearly favored the SB Audigy SE. However, the difference was minor when utilizing our 4, 5.1, or 7.1 speaker setup in a typical room environment. The Sound Blaster X-FI has the lowest overall rates with the Realtek solutions and SB Audigy SE following closely. Let's find out how these results translate into real world numbers.

Game Audio Performance - BattleField 2


Game Audio Performance - F.E.A.R. - Performance Test


Game Audio Performance - Half Life 2 - Dupont Canals 12


Game Audio Performance - Serious Sam II - Branchester Demo


The audio performance numbers remain consistent as the Sound Blaster Audigy SE finishes behind the SoundBlaster X-FI while trading places with the Realtek audio solutions. Serious Sam II has an average loss of 30%, Battlefield 2 at 31%, Half Life 2 at 10%, and F.E.A.R. at 6%.

The output quality of audio with the Sound Blaster Audigy SE ranks closely with the Realtek ALC-882/883, while game performance is impressive for an on-board solution. The vast majority of users should have no issues utilizing the SB Audigy SE as their primary audio solution considering the audio quality and performance at this time.

Obviously, if you are a serious gamer, then a dedicated sound card is still useful to ensure consistent frame rate averages across a wide variety of games, and in the case of the Sound Blaster X-FI you also get improved audio quality and EAX4/5 support.

Firewire, USB and Network Performance Final Words
Comments Locked

42 Comments

View All Comments

  • DigitalFreak - Tuesday, April 11, 2006 - link

    Agreed. However, there are alternatives if you have the PCI-E slots available. Going the add-in route also allows you to run off the PCI-E bus. 1394b can saturate the PCI bus.

    http://www.siig.com/product.asp?pid=1013">PCI-E Firewire 800 adapter
  • Olaf van der Spek - Tuesday, April 11, 2006 - link

    [quote]MSI provides an SLI Video Link card that is long enough to connect two NVIDIA based video cards for SLI operation along with a digital switching method that eliminates the use of jumpers to configure SLI capability.[/quote]
    Does that switch between dual x16 and dual x16???
  • DigitalFreak - Tuesday, April 11, 2006 - link

    LOL Sounds like someone has been cut & pasting together reviews.
  • Gary Key - Tuesday, April 11, 2006 - link

    No cut and paste, the sentence content was corrected, lets call it an editorial difference of opinion. :)
  • decalpha - Tuesday, April 11, 2006 - link

    http://anandtech.com/mb/showdoc.aspx?i=2739&p=...">http://anandtech.com/mb/showdoc.aspx?i=2739&p=...

    The MSI K8N Diamond Plus was extremely stable with 4 DDR2 modules in Dual-Channel operation
  • Wesley Fink - Tuesday, April 11, 2006 - link

    Corrected to DDR.
  • MIKEMIKE - Tuesday, April 11, 2006 - link

    meant that to read:

    Something about the first page irked me, it isnt a normal introduction to the item being reviewed. it seems as if that needs to be a second page, and a new first page drafted up.
  • redbone75 - Tuesday, April 11, 2006 - link

    I may be mistaken, but I think it's called an introduction.
  • MIKEMIKE - Tuesday, April 11, 2006 - link

    Something withthe layout, and introduction of the mobo irked me and turned me off of the review in general, not sure what specifically though.
  • Gary Key - Tuesday, April 11, 2006 - link

    Thanks for the comments. At times we try different layouts, some work, some do not, but hopefully we progress for the better over time.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now