Setting Expectations

While we've been used to running high end SLI setups at 3MP resolutions and still getting reasonable frame rates in games, the same is not true for Oblivion. In fact, there isn't a single GPU or pair of GPUs today that will run Oblivion at 1600 x 1200 with everything turned on smoothly. Our highest end X1900 XT CrossFire setup can't even run our most stressful real world Oblivion test at 1280 x 1024 with all of the detail settings set to their highest values. That's right, $1200 worth of GPUs will get you less than 50 fps at less than the highest image quality, and we're not talking about having AA enabled either.

With Oblivion, you've got to set your expectations appropriately for what good performance is. If your frame rate never drops below 30 fps, then you've put together a very fast system for Oblivion. The problem with Oblivion is that while performance may be in the 60 - 70 fps range indoors or while taking a stroll around town, as soon as you engage a few enemies or walk near an oblivion gate your frame rate may drop into the teens. A choppy frame rate really impacts your ability to do things like slice the correct opponent and not someone you're trying to protect. If a video card can maintain a minimum of 20 fps in our most strenuous test (the Oblivion Gate benchmark) then it will do you very well, otherwise you may want to start turning down some of the visual quality options.

Oblivion is also one of those rare games where turning down all of the image quality options not only impacts how good the game looks, but it actually can have a pretty serious impact on gameplay as well. Turning down your view distance is a sure fire way to increase performance, however the lower your view distance is the more difficult it is to spot landmarks you're searching for. You can decrease things like the distance which characters, items and other objects will appear, giving you better performance, but also putting you at a disadvantage when you're looking for a particular item or when someone is about to attack you. With Oblivion it's not all about performance and dealing with slightly blurred textures and jagged edges to maintain higher frame rates, the total experience of the game is very dependent on having a powerful system with a fast GPU.

The Test

Given that we're looking at GPU performance we tested all graphics cards with the same, very fast CPU, to minimize any CPU bottlenecks. In future articles we will look at how the CPU impacts performance under Oblivion, but for now the GPU is our focus. All ATI cards were run on a CrossFire 3200 platform while all NVIDIA cards were run on an nForce4 SLI x16 platform.

The latest drivers from ATI and NVIDIA were used, including ATI's Chuck patch for Oblivion that enables CrossFire support and AA+HDR rendering support. Given the low frame rates that we're talking about already, enabling AA simply didn't make any sense as you will see from the performance results on the coming pages. We would much rather increase detail settings than turn on AA in Oblivion.

CPU: AMD Athlon 64 FX-60 (2.6GHz/1MBx2)
Motherboard: ASUS A8N32-SLI
ASUS A8R32-MVP
Chipset: NVIDIA nForce4 SLI x16
ATI CrossFire 3200
Chipset Drivers: nForce4 6.85
ATI Catalyst 6.4
Hard Disk: Seagate 7200.9 300GB SATA
Memory: 2 x 1GB OCZ PC3500 DDR 2-3-2-7
Video Drivers: ATI Catalyst 6.4 w/ Chuck Patch
NVIDIA ForceWare 84.43
Desktop Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - 32-bit @ 60Hz
OS: Windows XP Professional SP2
Our Settings High End GPU Performance w/ HDR Enabled
Comments Locked

100 Comments

View All Comments

  • MrCoyote - Wednesday, April 26, 2006 - link

    What good does it do to benchmark this game? The engine they licensed for this game is very limited in performance and unoptimized <b>(GameByro)</b>. Please wait until a patch comes out, then benchmark the game. This performance limit can be seen in various reviews across the web. A 7900GT or X1900XT should be getting more than 20-30FPS on this game.
  • munky - Wednesday, April 26, 2006 - link

    People are not gonna wait for a patch to buy the game, and the whole premise of improved performance with a patch is uncertain. This review is useful for those who have the game, and would like to know if a certain upgrade would give them a significant improvement, or would just like to see how their performance compares to those with other video cards.
  • Jackyl - Wednesday, April 26, 2006 - link

    That's very true that the game is very much in an "unfinished" stage and was released too soon. Any professional developer knows that the Gamebyro engine has it's share of performance problems. It is not in the same league of engines as others. Why they licensed this engine is beyond me.

    Warning...Don't post anything even remotely negative about the game on the official forums. Fanboys will be waiting to lash back at you. Yet people are complaining left and right on the forums of the performance problems, bugs, and interface problems. The PC game looks nothing but just a console port. Bad inventory screen system and GUI. Hopefully a 3rd party modder can change these things.
  • poohbear - Wednesday, April 26, 2006 - link

    the bad inventory has already been resolved w/ a user mod. look for the Btmod-2.20
  • nts - Wednesday, April 26, 2006 - link

    The X1800XT can be had for less than the 7900GT and performs better...

    Why was it not include it in the Mid Range graphs?
  • SiliconDoc - Friday, July 17, 2009 - link

    Wow, how quickly the complaining masses forget. $1,200.00 for two ati cards - LOL
    And here I've been told by all the disgruntled red fans that nvidia is the greedy scalping horror....
    BWHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
    ---
    It's so nice that anandtech doesn't delete their old reviews.
    TWELVE HUNDRED BUCKAROOS FOR 2 ATI CARDS.
    --
    Once again I find out the red fans have been deceiving me all along.
    This is great - another myth of the web, exploded thanks to the web.
  • Spoelie - Wednesday, April 26, 2006 - link

    So very true
    http://www.alternate.de/html/productDetails.html?a...">http://www.alternate.de/html/productDetails.html?a...
    http://www.alternate.de/html/productDetails.html?a...">http://www.alternate.de/html/productDetails.html?a...

    For the money, the x1800xt 512mb seems a better deal.
  • bob661 - Thursday, April 27, 2006 - link

    Just checked on Newegg and the prices are the same unless you go with the 256MB version of the X1800XT.
  • bob661 - Thursday, April 27, 2006 - link

    On Zipzoomfly, the 7900GT is a bit cheaper.
  • Anand Lal Shimpi - Wednesday, April 26, 2006 - link

    We inadvertently left it out of the midrange tests; I just updated the graphs and conclusion to reflect its inclusion.

    Take care,
    Anand

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now