Intel's Core 2 Extreme & Core 2 Duo: The Empire Strikes Back
by Anand Lal Shimpi on July 14, 2006 12:00 AM EST- Posted in
- CPUs
New Pricing
As you will soon see, Intel's new Core 2 lineup has basically made all previous Intel processors worthless. The performance of the new Core 2 CPUs is so much greater, with much lower power consumption, that owners of NetBurst based processors may want to dust off the old drill bits and make some neat looking keychains.
Intel also realizes that its new Core 2 line will make its older Pentium D and Pentium Extreme Edition processors seem a bit homely, and thus it will significantly reduce the pricing on some of the CPUs by the end of this month to help spruce them up a bit.
Intel's new pricing, effective starting July 23rd, is listed below:
CPU | Clock Speed | L2 Cache | Price |
Intel Core 2 Extreme X6800 | 2.93GHz | 4MB | $999 |
Intel Core 2 Duo E6700 | 2.66GHz | 4MB | $530 |
Intel Core 2 Duo E6600 | 2.40GHz | 4MB | $316 |
Intel Core 2 Duo E6400 | 2.13GHz | 2MB | $224 |
Intel Core 2 Duo E6300 | 1.86GHz | 2MB | $183 |
Intel Pentium D 945 | 3.40GHz | 2MBx2 | $163 |
Intel Pentium D 915 | 2.80GHz | 2MBx2 | $133 |
Intel Pentium D 820 | 2.80GHz | 1MBx2 | $113 |
Intel Pentium D 805 | 2.66GHz | 1MBx2 | $93 |
The table above only showcases the NetBurst CPUs that are actually cheaper than their Core 2 counterparts; there are a number that are priced equal to Core 2 options, but you'll want to stay away from those (more blatant foreshadowing).
Unfortunately AMD won't have an architectural update of the Athlon 64 X2 until sometime in 2007 or 2008, thus its only response to Intel's Core 2 lineup today is to also reduce pricing. Shortly before today's launch AMD informed us that more aggressive price cuts for the Athlon 64 X2 line were coming in July, but we couldn't get any more specific information. The best numbers we've got are those that were leaked shortly after Computex, which may end up being higher than what AMD is now thinking of doing:
CPU | Clock Speed | L2 Cache | Projected Price |
AMD Athlon 64 X2 5000+ | 2.6GHz | 512KBx2 | $403 |
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4600+ | 2.4GHz | 512KBx2 | $301 |
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4200+ | 2.2GHz | 512KBx2 | $240 |
AMD Athlon 64 X2 3800+ | 2.0GHz | 512KBx2 | $169 |
In order to keep prices competitive, AMD is also killing off its Athlon 64 X2s with a 1MB L2 cache. By only shipping 512KB parts (except for the limited quantities of FX processors that are sold), AMD can produce more CPUs per wafer and thus help increase supply and offer lower prices.
Below we've compared both AMD and Intel's proposed price cuts, and as you can see, AMD needs to do a lot more in order to remain competitive.
CPU | Clock Speed | L2 Cache | Price |
Intel Core 2 Extreme X6800 | 2.93GHz | 4MB | $999 |
Intel Core 2 Duo E6700 | 2.66GHz | 4MB | $530 |
AMD Athlon 64 X2 5000+ | 2.6GHz | 512KBx2 | $403* |
Intel Core 2 Duo E6600 | 2.40GHz | 4MB | $316 |
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4600+ | 2.4GHz | 512KBx2 | $301* |
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4200+ | 2.2GHz | 512KBx2 | $240* |
Intel Core 2 Duo E6400 | 2.13GHz | 2MB | $224 |
Intel Core 2 Duo E6300 | 1.86GHz | 2MB | $183 |
AMD Athlon 64 X2 3800+ | 2.0GHz | 512KBx2 | $169* |
Intel Pentium D 945 | 3.40GHz | 2MBx2 | $163 |
Intel Pentium D 915 | 2.80GHz | 2MBx2 | $133 |
Intel Pentium D 820 | 2.80GHz | 1MBx2 | $113 |
Intel Pentium D 805 | 2.66GHz | 1MBx2 | $93 |
*Note: The AMD prices are still rumored. We're waiting for final confirmation from AMD for accuracy.
Based on these prices, AMD's Athlon 64 X2 4600+ would have to beat Intel's E6600, the 4200+ would have to beat the E6400 and the X2 3800+ would have to be somewhere in between the performance of a Pentium D 940/945 and an E6300.
We're getting the impression that AMD may be cutting prices more than what we've seen here, but we have no idea to what degree yet. By the end of this year AMD will also offer higher clock speeds as well as its new 4x4 platform (dual socket, dual core desktop Athlon 64 FX motherboards), but that's all we can expect for the foreseeable future.
202 Comments
View All Comments
Anand Lal Shimpi - Friday, July 14, 2006 - link
Corrected, it was a misprint.Take care,
Anand
Zorba - Friday, July 14, 2006 - link
Why is the article talking about how Intel is killing AMD on power consumption when AMD is on the top for both idle and load? If you are doing a performance/watt ratio you need to show that on the graph. This page (page 7) just makes the how article look completely baised.Calin - Friday, July 14, 2006 - link
Because the EE SFF processors were hard to obtain by Anandtech even for testing purposes. I'm not sure they are available in retail market any more than Conroe isAnand Lal Shimpi - Friday, July 14, 2006 - link
The Core 2 Extreme X6800 has a performance per watt score of 0.3575 in WME9 compared to 0.2757 for the X2 3800+ EE SFF. I'll put together a performance per watt graph now and see if I can stick it in there.Take care,
Anand
Anand Lal Shimpi - Friday, July 14, 2006 - link
I included the performance per watt scores I mentioned above in the review now, hopefully that will make things a little more clear.Take care,
Anand
JarredWalton - Friday, July 14, 2006 - link
I don't see the chart, Anand - I hope I didn't accidentally overwrite your change. Sorry!MrKaz - Friday, July 14, 2006 - link
Don't put it because it's a biased chart,Why based on WM9 benchmark? Why not one of the others?
Why put it now, if you never put it when A64 was killing the P4s?
coldpower27 - Friday, July 14, 2006 - link
Because AMD didn't real make a big deal about the performance per watt intiative back in the day. They focused on their price/performance instead.MrKaz - Friday, July 14, 2006 - link
So?Just because Intel focuses now on that Anandtech must be obliged to put it?
So for you where was the price/performance (A64 vs P4) charts on Anandtech reviews?
coldpower27 - Friday, July 14, 2006 - link
Yeah, due to their making people aware of it, it has now become a issue.It was only after Prescott, that we became more aware that thermals were starting to get out of control and paid more attention to wattage numbers.
Price/Performance is not as hard to calculate.