NVIDIA's GeForce 8800 (G80): GPUs Re-architected for DirectX 10

111 Comments

View All Comments

• JarredWalton - Wednesday, November 8, 2006 - link

  They did the same thing with the original Halo, porting it (and slowing it down) to DX9. MS seems to think making Halo 2 Vista-only will get people to upgrade to the new OS. [:rolls eyes:]

• stmok - Wednesday, November 8, 2006 - link

  How else are they gonna get gamers to upgrade to Vista? :)
  (by cornering them into adopting Vista, using DirectX 10.0)
  
  Its sad and pathetic at the same time.
  
  DirectX 10.0 should be a "transitional" solution...That is, it covers both XP and Vista. This allows people to gradually upgrade their hardware, and if they wish, to Vista. What MS is doing now, is throwing everyone (developers and consumers) into the deep end, and expecting them to pay for the changes. (I suspect some would be put off by this, while the majority will continue to accept it...Which is unfortunate).
  
  
  Great article BTW. Interesting to see the high-end stuff...But I doubt I can afford it in this lifetime!
  
  I have two questions!
  
  (1) Any chance of looking at a triple video card setup?
  (I saw a presentation slide which had 2 video cards in SLI, while a third showed something else on screen).
  
  (2) Any idea when the GF8600-series comes?
  (mainstream market solution).

• yyrkoon - Thursday, November 9, 2006 - link

  Great, links arent working ?
  
  http://www.gamedev.net/reference/programming/featu...">http://www.gamedev.net/reference/programming/featu...

• yyrkoon - Thursday, November 9, 2006 - link

  http://www.gamedev.net/reference/programming/featu...">
  
  This article was written by a friend of mine back in April after an interview with ATI. Perhaps this will clear some things up.

• yyrkoon - Thursday, November 9, 2006 - link

  When you break all hardware/software ties to something that has been around for 4-5 years? Its not that easy making it "transitional". From a software perspective, D3D10 is not compatable with XP in the least.
  
  I for one, think this is a step in the right direction.

• JarredWalton - Thursday, November 9, 2006 - link

  Supposedly all of the changes to the WDDM make porting DX10 back to Windows XP "impossible", although I'm more inclined to think the correct term would be "difficult" and you also have to add in "it doesn't fit with MS marketing protocol". WDDM is quite different in Vista however, so maybe there's some substance to the claims.

• cosmotic - Wednesday, November 8, 2006 - link

  On page 9:
  
  --Briefly explain what a sub-pixel is in the sentence before--

• JarredWalton - Wednesday, November 8, 2006 - link

  Due to the size of this article and the amount of time it took to get ready, let me preempt any comments about the spelling and grammar. I am in the process of editing the final document as I read through it, and there are spelling/grammar errors. If they bother you too much, check back in an hour. If you read this an hour from now and you still find errors, then you can respond, though it would be useful to keep all responses in a single thread like this one.
  
  Thanks in advance,
  Jarred Walton
  Editor
  AnandTech.com
  

• xtknight - Thursday, November 16, 2006 - link

  On p 12 (gamma corrected AA):
  
  "This causes problems for thing like thin lines."

• acejj26 - Wednesday, November 8, 2006 - link

  "If DirectX 10 sounds like a great boon to software developers, the fact that DX10 will only be supported in Windows XP is certain to curb enthusiasm. "
  
  I believe this should say "DX10 will only be supported in Windows Vista..."
  
  Not to be rude, but shouldn't the article be edited BEFORE being published??