Intel P35 Memory Performance: A Closer Look
by Wesley Fink on May 18, 2007 12:00 PM EST- Posted in
- CPUs
Memory Test Configuration
In the original DDR3 vs. DDR2 review a 4MB cache E6420 was overclocked to provide 8x333 2.66GHz testing. An X6800 was used to provide the 10x266 2.66GHz configuration for comparison. For the revised tests, we used the X6800 for all testing since it was simpler to use an unlocked CPU with the flexibility to run all of the CPU configurations needed in our benchmarking. In addition we have seen some variation in the performance of different Core 2 Duo processors and we wanted to remove that variable. While we don't know exactly why, X6800 processors are often a bit faster in gaming benchmarks than some other Core 2 Duo chips. We suspected this might be distorting the real improvement in our gaming test and using the same processor removes that variable.
Memory is now also limited to Corsair DDR3 and DDR2 since there were minor variations in the performance of our two DDR3 memories. This eliminates another potential variable from the benchmarks. All other components are the same as the initial review.
Benchmarks with the P965 at 1333 FSB were not really of much use in our testing, since the memory ratios would not also allow standard memory speeds of 800 and 1066 when the bus was set to 1333. Also none of the DDR2 memory we had would run at 1333 on the P965. The P965 Is not really designed for a stock 1333 FSB so it was only tested at a 1066 FSB.
Since the P965 was not well suited for 1333 testing, the P35 was adjusted down to 1066FSB for comparison of memory performance. With that setting performance could be tested at DDR2-800 and DDR2-1066. However, a 1333 memory ratio cannot be selected with a 1066 FSB on the P35 boards that were tested, so it was not possible to run memory at 1333 and the CPU at 1066. That is the reason there are no 1333 memory speeds reported under the 10x266 CPU timings.
In the original DDR3 vs. DDR2 review a 4MB cache E6420 was overclocked to provide 8x333 2.66GHz testing. An X6800 was used to provide the 10x266 2.66GHz configuration for comparison. For the revised tests, we used the X6800 for all testing since it was simpler to use an unlocked CPU with the flexibility to run all of the CPU configurations needed in our benchmarking. In addition we have seen some variation in the performance of different Core 2 Duo processors and we wanted to remove that variable. While we don't know exactly why, X6800 processors are often a bit faster in gaming benchmarks than some other Core 2 Duo chips. We suspected this might be distorting the real improvement in our gaming test and using the same processor removes that variable.
Memory is now also limited to Corsair DDR3 and DDR2 since there were minor variations in the performance of our two DDR3 memories. This eliminates another potential variable from the benchmarks. All other components are the same as the initial review.
Memory Performance Test Configuration | |
Processor | Intel Core 2 Duo X6800 (x2, 2.93GHz unlocked, 4MB Unified Cache) 10x266 - 2.66 GHz 8x333 - 2.66GHz |
RAM | Corsair CM3X1024-1066C7 (2GB Kit - 2x1GB) Corsair Dominator CM2X1024-8888C4 (2GB Kit - 2x1GB) |
Hard Drive | Samsung 250GB SATA2 enabled (8MB Buffer) |
System Platform Drivers | Intel - 8.3.0.1013 |
Video Card | Leadtek WinFast 7950GT 256MB |
Video Drivers | NVIDIA 93.71 |
CPU Cooling | Intel Retail HSF |
Power Supply | Corsair HX620W |
Motherboards | Asus P5K3 Deluxe (Intel P35 DDR3) Asus P5K Deluxe (Intel P35 DDR2) Asus P5B Deluxe (Intel P965 DDR2) |
Operating System | Windows XP Professional SP2 |
Bench Software | SiSoft Sandra XI SP2 CPU-Z 1.40 Everest 4.0 Super Pi 1.5 Far Cry - River Demo |
Benchmarks with the P965 at 1333 FSB were not really of much use in our testing, since the memory ratios would not also allow standard memory speeds of 800 and 1066 when the bus was set to 1333. Also none of the DDR2 memory we had would run at 1333 on the P965. The P965 Is not really designed for a stock 1333 FSB so it was only tested at a 1066 FSB.
Since the P965 was not well suited for 1333 testing, the P35 was adjusted down to 1066FSB for comparison of memory performance. With that setting performance could be tested at DDR2-800 and DDR2-1066. However, a 1333 memory ratio cannot be selected with a 1066 FSB on the P35 boards that were tested, so it was not possible to run memory at 1333 and the CPU at 1066. That is the reason there are no 1333 memory speeds reported under the 10x266 CPU timings.
14 Comments
View All Comments
JarredWalton - Friday, May 18, 2007 - link
We don't generally used beta drivers unless there is no other viable option (i.e. a new graphics card where the non-beta drivers are not yet available). I don't really expect the later drivers to improve performance, but perhaps that's something Gary will be looking at in our official P35 chipset article. Check back next week. :-)rjm55 - Friday, May 18, 2007 - link
I was fairly convinced that the increases you saw the first time were just the 1333 speed. Looks like I was wrong. Thanks for doing more testing that shows the P35 is a better performer and the reasons are the memory controller by itself in gaming. This should shut up the no-difference posters.sdsdv10 - Friday, May 18, 2007 - link
Agreed. Article like this is why AnandTech is one of best tech sites on the web!sdsdv10 - Friday, May 18, 2007 - link
Ummm...Article --> Articles
While they maybe one the best, the comment section could still use a edit function dammit.