Specifications
Transcend's 2.5" SSD solid state disk line comes in three size offerings at this point in time, ranging from 8GB to 32GB. We'll be reviewing the middle product for this review, which weighs in at 16GB.
Transcend has chosen to offer two lines of 2.5" SSD drives, differing in their use of either IDE or SATA interfaces. This line in particular, which uses a 2.5" IDE interface, appears to be geared more toward notebook hard disk replacements in the industrial or medical fields. The 3,600,000 hour MTBF figure (common both to its SATA and IDE product lines) is extremely impressive under any circumstances, and certainly will make any notebook user who has experienced a conventional hard disk failure take note. However, given the impressive MTBF numbers, we are disappointed to see a two year warranty on the drive.
We'll put the SSD25 through its paces today, using the MTRON 32GB SSD, Super Talent 16GB SSD, and Seagate Momentus 7200.2 as comparison drives. We'll also include a Western Digital Raptor as a representative of what maximum performance desktop drives can achieve. While the SSD25 won't challenge the MTRON SSD or Western Digital Raptor drives in terms of raw performance, we feel it's important to showcase Transcend's offering against these drives to show both where the benefits - and weaknesses - of this alternative technology lie.
| Drive Specifications | |||
| MTRON SSD 32GB MSD-SATA6025 |
Seagate Momentus 7200.2 160GB ST9160823ASG |
Transcend 16GB TS16GSSD25-S |
|
| Manufacturer's Stated Capacity | 32 GB | 160 GB | 16GB |
| Operating System Stated Capacity | 30.9 GB | 149.05 GB | 15.5 GB |
| Interface | SATA 1.5Gb/s | SATA 3Gb/s | PATA - UDMA Mode 4 |
| Rotational Speed | n/a | 7,200 RPM | n/a |
| Cache Size | n/a | 8 MB | n/a |
| Read Seek Time | .1 ms | 14.1 ms | average 1 ms |
| Number of Heads | n/a | 4 | n/a |
| Number of Platters | n/a | 2 | n/a |
| Power Draw Idle / Load | .55W / 3.1W | .87W / 2.89W | .66W / 1.26W |
| Acoustics Idle / Load | 0 dB(A) / 0 dB(A) | 27 dB(A) / 33 dB(A) | 0 dB(A) / 0 dB(A) |
| Thermals Idle / Load | 29C / 31C | 33C / 39C | 27C / 28C |
| Write/Erase Endurance | >140 years at 50GB Write/Erase Cycles per Day | - | Transcend claims 3.6 million hour MTBF rating based on 10 year usage rates |
| Data Retention | 10 years | - | 10 years |
| Command Queuing | n/a | Native Command Queuing | n/a |
| Warranty | 5 Years | 5 Years | 2 Years |
Transcend's 2.5" SSD solid state disk line comes in three size offerings at this point in time, ranging from 8GB to 32GB. We'll be reviewing the middle product for this review, which weighs in at 16GB.
Transcend has chosen to offer two lines of 2.5" SSD drives, differing in their use of either IDE or SATA interfaces. This line in particular, which uses a 2.5" IDE interface, appears to be geared more toward notebook hard disk replacements in the industrial or medical fields. The 3,600,000 hour MTBF figure (common both to its SATA and IDE product lines) is extremely impressive under any circumstances, and certainly will make any notebook user who has experienced a conventional hard disk failure take note. However, given the impressive MTBF numbers, we are disappointed to see a two year warranty on the drive.
We'll put the SSD25 through its paces today, using the MTRON 32GB SSD, Super Talent 16GB SSD, and Seagate Momentus 7200.2 as comparison drives. We'll also include a Western Digital Raptor as a representative of what maximum performance desktop drives can achieve. While the SSD25 won't challenge the MTRON SSD or Western Digital Raptor drives in terms of raw performance, we feel it's important to showcase Transcend's offering against these drives to show both where the benefits - and weaknesses - of this alternative technology lie.
Facebook
Twitter
RSS
18 Comments
View All Comments
Pirks - Tuesday, October 23, 2007 - link
Everybody read this! -> http://www.tomshardware.co.uk/RAID-Flash-SSD,revie...">http://www.tomshardware.co.uk/RAID-Flash-SSD,revie...This is what I would like to see from anandtech
Raid them guys, RAID 'em
mmmm! [salivating again]
AnnihilatorX - Tuesday, October 23, 2007 - link
Indeed. I wish Anandtech did something similar but with more testing.I plan on building such a setup with SATA adaptors and motherboard RAID instead of using a PCI channel.
It'd be much more affordable for such a performance for my next PC set-up. ($300 24GB ultra fast SSD anyone?)
Someone can even have 4*16GB CF cards for ultra fast 64GB RAIDing. It may even match a 64GB MTRON at quarter the price.
Pirks - Tuesday, October 23, 2007 - link
Actually, this is the best and the most brilliant avenue for anandtech reviews! Hey Anand and Co - drop this PSU stuff, that's boring - give us at least some regular reviews of this CF RAID stuff. Looks like the tech is ripe and people are doing it already. Time to wake up, Anand! Give us a regular monthly column with updates and fresh links/info of the best cost effective way to build our own cheap and darn fast RAIDed SSD clones!Everybody cheer with me! Woohoo!
We need Anand to do this ASAP!
JarredWalton - Tuesday, October 23, 2007 - link
It doesn't seem like the CF + RAID approach is really very affordable either. Top quality 266X CF cards cost as much as these SSDs. For example, here's the http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N8...">IDE Super Talent 16GB that costs $290. Or there's the http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N8...">32GB IDE Super Talent for $489 - not even twice as much anymore! So we're down to a price of only $15.28 per GB.Looking for fast 266X CF cards, they currently top out at 8GB sizes, which start at around $120. $30 for an adapter makes it $150, and you'll need two for 16GB which brings you back to $300. Two 8GB CF 266X cards in RAID 0 would indeed be faster than the single 16GB Transcend/Super Talent SSD, but then two 8GB SSDs cost around $170 and would also be in the same performance range.
The Raptor 150GB in contrast is a whopping $1.20 per GB, or you can pick up something silly like the 750GB Hitachi for $0.27 per GB - not that anyone could possibly fill 750GB, right? (And yes, there's some sarcasm in those statements.) While these are desktop drives, RAID and SSD basically means using a desktop in most cases as well.
The one oddity right now is that the SATA SSDs seem to cost about twice as much as the IDE SSDs, probably a supply/demand thing. (Or a "milking the bleeding edge" thing - which is just another facet of supply/demand.) None of the various flash drive options are even remotely affordable, however. That will likely change over time, and when we can get 64-128GB SSDs with something in the realm of 100-150 MB/s transfer rates for under $100, I can see them being nice for people that don't need lots of storage. With Vista sucking down 15GB or so, though, and increasing application sizes, 32GB would be a bare minimum I think.
AnnihilatorX - Tuesday, October 23, 2007 - link
The fact that SATA SSDs are much more expensive than IDE counterparts is not mainly down to the interface. The link to the IDE SSD you posted are generally quite old intermsof flash I/O tech and performance in ranges of 20-30 MB/s; 25% slower than a 266x CF card.Therefore, CF cards are still more cost effective if you want to match HDD in terns of transfer rate with a RAID setup than buying either IDE/SATA SSDs. (you need to RAID three slow IDE SSDsfor same performance as two 266x CF cards.)
Pirks - Tuesday, October 23, 2007 - link
Guys, I can't believe you haven't put two and four of these cheaper 8GB transcends in RAID0 and tested them.Holy creepers, I can't even imagine how FOUR such drives would work in RAID 0.
Arghhhh... you guys just were afraid to do this, that's be just toooo damn good to show us, huh?
Just kiddin'
I'm sure four such transcends would kill any raptor or anything. 90 megabytes/sec sustained transfer and 1 ms seek - gosh I need me some lucky lottery ticket!
[salivating violently and dreaming about raid 0 with these babies]
cableman67 - Friday, July 22, 2011 - link
I have a netbook which utilizes the new solid state drive and I have to admit that although I prefer the regular sata and ide hard drives that these new drives do have a lot of good options going for them.For one thing there is not really the space for conventional hard drives in these new netbooks which are so small and I have found the performance to be really great. It really exceeded my expectations because I didn't really see it performing any where near the performance I received.
The only thing that I really regret so far is the fact that it is hard to get the size memory that I would like to have but for what I use my netbook for it hasn't really been a problem yet. Overall I must say that I am impressed with the performance and well satisfied fr now.
For those people that aren't happy with these drives then just spend the few extra bucks and get a full fledged laptop and be done with it.
oletagust - Wednesday, June 15, 2022 - link
The task of the introduction is to capture the reader's attention: to ask an exciting question, to confront him with a paradox, a contradiction. The introduction https://en.writingapaper.net/coursework-writing-se... should intrigue the reader so that he or she cannot resist reading the rest of the text. The thesis is the author's main idea, expressed in one or more sentences. A thesis statement is a statement of the main idea of a text that is consistent with the question posed or the theme set.