Power Supply Roundup: 730W to 900W
by Christoph Katzer on November 22, 2007 3:00 AM EST- Posted in
- Cases/Cooling/PSUs
Prices and Conclusion
All the power supplies seen today perform well under normal conditions, though Amacrox showed us why we actually test under stress conditions like the heat chamber. This is in fact the first broken power supply we've encountered since we started reviewing PSUs this year; frankly, we're surprised it took this long. The cause of the failure is most likely a broken Schottky diode, but our investigation is ongoing.
Though the power supplies have different max outputs, they can be regarded as one group serving the high-end market. These are power supplies for people running more than one graphics card and multi-core CPUs, probably with some moderate overclocking as well. After looking at the test results, we like the Cooler Master M850 and Antec TruePower Quattro 850 the most. They are reliable and have very stable DC outputs. They also generate the highest efficiency scores of the group with up to 87% at a medium load of 400W (with 230VAC). However, the ripple results could be better, and from in terms of noise the Cooler Master performs better than the Antec unit.
At the end of the day, it often comes down to price - perhaps the most important factor for many buyers. While a PSU may perform incredibly well, if the price is too high many will opt for a cheaper competitor. We'll look at prices in both $USD and EUR.
Some of the units are currently not available in the US, so we'll omit them from the $USD comparison. The Seasonic X900 is a very nice power supply, but we have to recommend looking at other previously tested models. You are far better off with the PC Power & Cooling Silencer 750 QUAD for a lower price and equal or better performance. Silverstone's Olympia is also too expensive right now, and given the performance in our tests we cannot give it a recommendation.
We mentioned Cooler Master and Antec already, as both generated good results. The price difference is quite large, and even though the Cooler Master performed slightly better we recommend the Antec TruePower Quattro since it's available for 140 EUR and $170 USD. At around 145 EUR or $200 USD the OCZ ModXStream places in the middle of the group, but despite reasonable performance we can't see much reason to buy an OCZ as opposed to the less expensive Antec TruePower Quattro.
Hiper targets the low to medium price regions. All of the units turned in a good performance today, and for the price we can certainly recommend them. Just pay attention to the available connectors, as we saw some important differences there.
Given the fact that the EUR to $USD exchange rate is quite high at the moment, all of the power supplies look like quite a bargain in the US. If you'd like to read more details of the individual power supplies, the remaining pages will provide pictures of the internals and additional commentary.
31 Comments
View All Comments
Christoph Katzer - Friday, November 23, 2007 - link
The arrangement will be changed next time ;)What about the amount of PSUs? Too many?
strikeback03 - Tuesday, November 27, 2007 - link
I like the voltage vs. load charts used previously better than the bar charts. Obviously impractical with a 10 PSU roundup, but I hope they come back for smaller articles.Would it at least be possible to keep a consistent order to the PSUs, instead of sorting by output voltage? On the 3.3V charts on page 4 for example, it's confusing to have the Hiper 730 at the bottom of the 20% chart then the top of the 50% chart.
Dayneaw - Thursday, November 22, 2007 - link
The first graph on page six seems to be missing the results of the silverstone.rickon66 - Thursday, November 22, 2007 - link
I love it when folks complain without even reading the review."Maybe you just forgot to upload the final page?"
Maybe you just forgot to read the review!!
Anyway-Good job on the review.
Talcite - Thursday, November 22, 2007 - link
Good job guys, the o-scope readings/explanations are particularly nice =D.SOLIDNecro - Thursday, November 22, 2007 - link
No "Final thoughts" or "Conclusions"???A summary report is one of the most important, if not most important part of any article, to leave it completely up to the reader to draw conclusions based on charts requires to much time and expertise for your average reader!
Also your "Editors" choice awards are invaluable, you guys are the "Pro's" and should be able to guide the reader to what you would purchase for your own rig, and why it stood out from the rest of the pack
Maybe you just forgot to upload the final page?
JEDIYoda - Thursday, November 22, 2007 - link
So whats so hard about making your own conclusion and thinking a little bit?Editor`s awards are bogus!
Grow up dude!
JEDIYoda - Thursday, November 22, 2007 - link
Editor choice rewards awards are bogus!You can read and comprehend - can`t you?
Make up your own mind!
Christoph Katzer - Thursday, November 22, 2007 - link
Just check the new arrangement. I wrote the comparison first and if somebody is interested to know more about a product he/she can check details after. The conclusion is on page 8.ChronoReverse - Thursday, November 22, 2007 - link
I find it rather confusing that way. I also thought that there was no conclusion until I read the comments.That said, I do usually read the conclusion first. Perhaps it should go back to the end and then a short abstract placed in the front?