The Gigabyte GA-X48T-DQ6 - Redefining the High End?
by Rajinder Gill on January 2, 2008 3:15 AM EST- Posted in
- Motherboards
450FSB BIOS Settings
These settings should prove useful for Q6600/QX6800/QX9650 CPUs, with the Q6600 currently being the most popular (and affordable). If a non boot is experienced when applying these BIOS profiles after a cleared CMOS or BIOS reset - increase tRD shown in the profiles by +1. A looser tRD will help the board complete the initial boot cycle. Re-enter BIOS,move the tRD back down by -1. Remember not to change memory divider/ CAS or Northbridge strap during the same reboot as tightening tRD.
| Gigabyte GA-X48T-DQ6 Bios Settings @ 450FSB | |
| Robust Graphics Booster | Turbo |
| CPU Clock Ratio | 8x (Q6600/QX6800) 9x (QX9650) |
| CPU Frequency | 450FSB |
| CPU Host Clock Control | Enabled |
| CPU Host Frequency (MHz) | 450 |
| PCI Express Frequency (MHz) | 100 |
| C.I.A.2 | Disabled |
| Performance Enhanced With | Extreme |
| System Memory Multiplier | 4.00B |
| DRAM Timing Selectable | Manual |
| CAS Latency Time | 8 |
| DRAM RAS# to CAS# Delay | 8 |
| DRAM RAS# Precharge | 8 |
| Precharge delay (tRAS) | 21 |
| ACT to ACT Delay (tRRD) | 4 |
| Rank Write To READ Delay | 8 |
| Write To Precharge Delay | 12 |
| Refresh to ACT Delay | 60 |
| Read to Precharge Delay | 6 |
| Static tRead Value | 7 or 8 depending on stability requirements (7 = higher performance) |
| Static tRead Phase Adjust | Auto |
| Command Rate | 1N |
| CPU/PCIEX Clock Driving | 800mV |
| CPU Clock Skew Control | Normal |
| (G)MCH Clock Skew Control | Normal |
| System Voltage Control | Manual |
| DDR3 Overvoltage Control | (+)0.55 |
| PCI-E Overvoltage Control | Normal |
| FSB Overvoltage Control | (+)0.35 |
| (G)MCH Overvoltage Control | (+)0.25V |
| Loadline Calibration | Disabled |
| CPU Voltage Control | Dependant on Processor |
Facebook
Twitter
RSS
37 Comments
View All Comments
hicookie - Thursday, January 3, 2008 - link
great oc ability and performance,air570fsb with e8400
http://pic.xfastest.com/hicookie/cpu/e8400/570.png">http://pic.xfastest.com/hicookie/cpu/e8400/570.png
and great in 3Ds
http://pic.xfastest.com/hicookie/HD3870/LN2/98223....">http://pic.xfastest.com/hicookie/HD3870/LN2/98223....
Rob94hawk - Friday, January 4, 2008 - link
Giver me a screenie of it being Orthos stable for 8 hours and I might actually be impressed.Gary Key - Thursday, January 3, 2008 - link
HiCookie,We could have posted similar results with the N2 BIOS, the only problem being that this BIOS will never see the light of day and is designed for one thing and one thing only, high FSB rates at the expense of everything else. Hell, we could have posted the same screenshots that Gigabyte engineering sent us, but what fun is that.
While it is nice to see those results, it is not exactly fair to post such results without notifying a potential buyer as to how and why they were obtained. Retail E8400s and the latest public release BIOS for this board resulted in max "stable" FSB rates around 520, sure we could do suicide shots and run SPi1M at 550, but try playing Crysis or encoding a movie at those settings. ;)
Googer - Thursday, January 3, 2008 - link
I am a Vintage IBM Keyboard fanatic and won't buy a motherboard that does not have PS2 ports, I know there are USB adapters out there but they don't really work as well as a real integrated controller. Gigabyte is my Hero!I am not alone. There are many, many more just like me.
takumsawsherman - Thursday, January 3, 2008 - link
Two ports for FW400? No ports for FW 800? I can hear the defense swarming now. No one uses FW800, etc., etc. Fewer people use it, true. Perhaps that is due to the fact that Motherboard manufacturers are refusing to provide it, requiring you to buy an add-on board if you don't buy a Mac.eye smite - Thursday, January 3, 2008 - link
From 2k2 to 2k4 I had 3 different gigabyte boards literally fail. Cmos would not clear them, they just physically failed. So my experiences with this manufacturer have left me with some disappointing experience, and I won't buy their products again. I'm sure other people have had better experiences, but for me 3 different boards that were 3 different models failing is enough for me to blackflag them on my money expenditures. I hope they've improved in reliability for it lasting more than a year, but from the looks of this review, they're struggling with it just functioning correctly with all of the included features. Personal opinion, asus, abit, even shuttle would be a better spend in the long run.kilkennycat - Thursday, January 3, 2008 - link
Historically, not exactly the most stellar enthusiast-motherboard vendor in terms of quality or consistent support...my personal opinion of course.Foxy1 - Wednesday, January 2, 2008 - link
I’m highly disappointed in AnandTech and its blatant disregard of its loyal readers. There is no excuse for the 9-day “holiday” break in which no articles/reviews were posted.I can already hear the writers whine in unison: “Are we not entitled to vacation time to enjoy the holidays?” To which I respond: Is everyday not a vacation for the slothful slackers that write for this site?
Rob94hawk - Friday, January 4, 2008 - link
Do you pay for these reviews or are they free? That's right you little twerp, you pay nothing so STFU NOOB!goinginstyle - Friday, January 4, 2008 - link
Foxy1,Why don't you go back to playing your Nintendo 64 and let mommy tuck you in tonight. Every single post you have around here is negative and constantly attacks the editors or readers. If you have that big of a problem, go to another site or start your own. I would love to comment on your first article. Anyway, if they want to take a vacation, so be it, everyone needs one at least once a year.