ZEROtherm Nirvana: Designed for Top Performance
by Wesley Fink on January 16, 2008 5:00 PM EST- Posted in
- Cases/Cooling/PSUs
CPU Cooling Test Configuration
All
tests use our new cooling test bed. This consists of a Rosewill R604-P-SL case
sold by Newegg without a power supply. The
Rosewill is typical of a moderately priced mid-tower case our readers might
own. We chose this case because it is a Newegg top seller and includes a
variable front intake louver and a quiet 120mm exhaust fan at the rear of the
case. The case is also screw-less with components held in place by plastic
holders instead of metal-to-metal connections. This appears to reduce case
vibration and noise.
The power supply is a Corsair HX620W, which has proven in benchmarks to be an
exceptionally quiet unit. The HX620W features a variable speed exhaust fan and
a down-facing intake fan mounted just above the CPU space in the case. To
eliminate the video card as a source of noise we have moved to a fanless card.
Since we will move to Vista and DX10 in the very near future, the test bed runs
an MSI NX8600 GTS that supports DX10 and cools with heatsinks and heatpipes.
The reduced noise power supply and fanless video card have the potential to
dramatically lower system noise in the test bed.
The motherboard is the ASUS P5K Deluxe. This P35 chipset motherboard has
exhibited outstanding overclocking capabilities in our testing. It can also
mount the newest 1333 FSB Intel Core processors and can handle our existing
high-speed DDR2 memory. The P5K3 uses heatsinks and heatpipes to cool board
components so all motherboard cooling is passive. There are no active cooling
fans to generate unwanted noise during testing.
The 120mm exhaust fan mounted to the rear of the case is below the system noise
floor. We run that fan during performance and overclocking tests. However,
system noise can be cumulative, so we turn off the exhaust fan during noise
testing.
Cooling Performance Test Configuration | |
Processor | Intel Core 2 Duo
X6800 (Dual-core 2.93GHz, 4MB Unified Cache) |
RAM | 2x1GB Corsair Dominator PC2-8888 (DDR2-1111) |
Hard Drive(s) | Hitachi 250GB SATA2 enabled (16MB Buffer) |
Video Card | MSI NX8600GTS (fanless) - All Standard Tests |
Intel TAT | Version 2.05.2006.0427 |
CoreTemp | Version 0.95 |
Video Drivers | NVIDIA 163.71 |
CPU Cooling | ZEROtherm Nirvana
NV120 Cooler Master Hyper 212 OCZ Vendetta Scythe Kama Cross Swiftech H2O-120 Compact Corsair Nautilus 500 Thermalright Ultima-90 ZEROtherm BTF90 Xigmatek AIO (AIO-S800P) Evercool Silver Knight Enzotech Ultra-X 3RSystem iCEAGE Thermaltake Big Typhoon VX Thermaltake MaxOrb Scythe Andy Samurai Master Cooler Master Gemini II Noctua NH-U12F Asus Silent Square Pro Scythe Ninja Plus Rev. B OCZ Vindicator Thermalright Ultra 120 Extreme Thermalright Ultra 120 Scythe Infinity Zalman CNS9700 Zalman CNS9500 Cooler Master Hyper 6+ Vigor Monsoon II Lite Thermalright MST-9775 Scythe Katana Tuniq Tower 120 Intel Stock HSF for X6800 |
Power Supply | Corsair HX620W |
Motherboards | Asus P5K Deluxe (Intel P35) |
Operating System | Windows XP Professional SP2 |
BIOS | Asus AMI 0501 (06/26/2007) |
We
run all cooling tests with the components mounted in the standard mid-tower
case. The idle and stress temperature tests are run with the case closed and
standing as it would in most home setups. Room temperature is measured before
beginning the cooler tests and is maintained in the 20 to 22C (68F to 72F)
range for all testing.
For consistency of test results, we use a standard premium silver-colored
thermal compound. In our experience, the thermal compound used makes little to
no difference in cooling test results. This is particularly true now that
processors ship with a large manufacturer-installed heatspreader. Our current
test procedure uses this standard high-quality silver-colored thermal paste for
all cooler reviews.
For comparison, we first tested the stock Intel air cooler at standard X6800
speeds and measured the CPU temperature at idle. We then stress the CPU by
running continuous loops of the Far Cry River demo. We repeat the same tests at
the highest stable overclock we could achieve with the stock cooler. "Stable"
in this case is the ability to handle our Far Cry looping for at least 30
minutes without crashing.
The same benchmarks are then run on the review cooler(s) at stock speed,
3.33GHz (10x333) at stock voltage, highest stock cooler OC speed (3.73GHz), and
the highest OC that could be achieved in the same setup with the cooler being
tested. This allows measurement of the cooling efficiency of the test unit compared
to stock and the improvement in overclocking capabilities, if any, from using
the test cooler.
We compare cooling results with a representative sample of air and
water-cooling results measured with CoreTemp. TAT provides a similar core
measurement, but test results with CoreTemp are more consistent over a wide
range of test conditions than the results reported by TAT. We retested previously
reviewed coolers with CoreTemp under idle and load conditions. In benchmarks
where the new test bed makes no apparent difference, like maximum overclock, we
include results for all coolers tested since beginning cooling reviews in early
2007.
Noise Levels
In addition to cooling efficiency and overclocking abilities, users shopping
for CPU cooling solutions may also be interested in the noise levels of the
cooling devices they are considering. We measure noise levels with the case on
its side using a C.E.M. DT-8850 Sound Level meter. This meter allows accurate
sound level measurements from 35b dB to 130 dB with a resolution of 0.1 dB and
an accuracy of 1.5 dB. This is sufficient for our needs in these tests, as
measurement starts at the level of a relatively quiet room. Our own test room,
with all computers and fans turned off, has a room noise level that has been reduced
slightly to 35.0 dB(A) compared to the previous 36.4 dB(A). With the new test
bed, the system noise at idle is 36.5 dB(A) at 24" and 37.8 dB(A) at 6".
This is better than our previous system noise floor of 38.3 dB(A) at 24".
The noise reduction at the 6" distance is dramatically lower than the
previous test bed floor of 47 dB(A).
38 Comments
View All Comments
Iketh - Wednesday, January 16, 2008 - link
umm that last graph clearly shows u the temp at max stablePolymerTim - Thursday, January 17, 2008 - link
Ahh, yeah, that would be it. So just disregard my last sentence. :)GhandiInstinct - Wednesday, January 16, 2008 - link
These cooler reviews provided a list of motherboards this thing can fit on. My # 1 problem is finding out if my motherboard or a new motherboard can support a cooler I want to mount.The manufacturer is very weak in providing this information.
Wesley Fink - Thursday, January 17, 2008 - link
Most of the top motherboard makers are very aware these days of the size and fit of the major coolers. There usually is no real problem with those top boards. Where we usually see fit issues is with the cheaper or lower line boards where board real estate is often a premium.Our problem is that it's not really possible to report a cooler fit on every board out there. We have tried in the past to comment on the major board fit but that is becoming a moot point since there are very few cooler fit issues at the top any more.
Our motherboard reviewers do a pretty good job of pointing out potential cooler fit problems in their reviews. The best source of the information you want might be to go back to the motherboard review for the board in question. We will also try to do a better job of pointing out any fit issues we ran into in our cooler reviews.
ussfletcher - Wednesday, January 16, 2008 - link
My friend bought one of these and when he installed it there were 2 metal edges poking out quite far from the bottom and caused his processor to overheat in seconds, I'm quite sure that it was installed correctly.. i was there.Wesley Fink - Thursday, January 17, 2008 - link
I've looked at the Nirvana closely and I can't figure out where the two metal protrusions might have been on your friend's cooler. The one I tested was very nicely finished, but defective ones can always slip through.. Can you please describe the manufacturing defect in more detail as I just can't get a mental picture of what was wrong.shabby - Wednesday, January 16, 2008 - link
What were the idle/load temps using the low fan setting?Wesley Fink - Wednesday, January 16, 2008 - link
I will add the Low speed results to the graph. Idle was 2C warmer than High and load was 3C warmer.