Bringing Competition to Midrange: The GeForce 9600 GT Raises NVIDIA's Sub $200 Bar
by Derek Wilson on February 21, 2008 9:00 AM EST- Posted in
- GPUs
The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion Performance
Version: 1.2.0416 Shivering Isles
Settings: Ultra High Quality settings defaults with vsync
disabled. No AA or AF.
Our Oblivion test takes place in the south of the Shivering Isles, running through woods over rolling hills toward a lake. This is a straight line run that lasts around 20 seconds and uses FRAPS to record framerate. This benchmark is very repeatable, but the first run is the most consistent between cards, so we only run the benchmark once through and take that number.
The only thing we change from the default Ultra High Quality settings is that we disable vsync and change the resolution. With higher performance cards, we might want to look into some of the user mods out there or hand tuning some of the quality values in the oblivion.ini file in order to push systems, but this generation of midrange cards seems to be able to handle Ultra High fairly well at the resolution games will likely run on these cards. Of course, we disable sound and don't run into any enemies in this test, so actual game play experience will likely be a bit lower. But cards that perform better in our test will be able to handle more under those conditions as well.
The AMD Radeon HD 3850 does much better with respect to the GeForce 9600 GT in this test than in others. The parts are still in the same class, but AMD has come out on top in this benchmark. Interestingly, this is also one of the only benchmarks where 256MB framebuffer on the 8800 GT doesn't totally trash its performance, and thus it also performs better much better than the 9600 GT.
Facebook
Twitter
RSS
49 Comments
View All Comments
ChronoReverse - Friday, February 22, 2008 - link
The 7950's can't beat the x1950's much less the 7900 series. The gap has only widen as more modern games came out.Aberforth - Thursday, February 21, 2008 - link
Crysis benchmark @ medium settings? gimme a break, Obviously this review is designed to show 9600GT in good light.rcc - Thursday, February 21, 2008 - link
As I read it, it's designed to show how it compares to similar cards. Sure they could provide test in in Crysis at full settings, but it's a bit like providing grand prix lap times on a Tercel.Staples - Thursday, February 21, 2008 - link
Either that or this was done very sloppy. The 8800GT 256 is mysteriously missing in all the benchmark which do not require a lot of video memory. In these tests, the 8800GT 256MB would win. I smell a rat.Kurotetsu - Thursday, February 21, 2008 - link
"The benchmarks don't prop up the card I bought so it must be bogus!"If the 3850 was leading in that test, you wouldn't be complaining at all.
Griswold - Thursday, February 21, 2008 - link
(_,_)pmonti80 - Thursday, February 21, 2008 - link
It's just a review made at the kind of settings most of the cards analized will be used. How useful can be a review were the cards are around 15 fps?ncage - Thursday, February 21, 2008 - link
For those who want a more lengthy writeup with more games tested and a bigger selection of video cards then check out the review at tomshardware. I wanted a comparison between the 8800GT 512MB & the 9600GT which is available at toms. I will tell you they are pretty close in benchmark numbers but the 8800GT still wins in every case which im quite happy about since i just bought a 8800GT :). We will see how good value the 9600GT is after the etailers do their price gouging. Still Nvidia is doing a VERY good job in bring competition to the market.knitecrow - Thursday, February 21, 2008 - link
bah... i am not going back to tom for anythingmurphyslabrat - Thursday, February 21, 2008 - link
I am sure this is on everyone's mind: overclock the thing already!