64GB SSD on the Desktop: Samsung and OCZ go mainstream
by Gary Key on May 15, 2008 11:30 PM EST- Posted in
- Storage
Test Setup
Standard Test
Bed Performance Test Configuration |
|
Processor | Phenom 9850BE |
RAM | GSkill PC2-8500 (2x2GB) - 4GB |
OS Hard Drive | Western Digital Caviar SE16 640GB SATA 3Gb/s |
System Platform Drivers | ATI - 8.4 |
Video Cards | MSI HD 3870x2 |
Video Drivers | ATI - 8.4 |
CPU Cooling | Thermalright Ultra-120 eXtreme |
Power Supply | Corsair CMPSU-520HX |
Optical Drive | LG GGCH20L - Blu-ray / HD-DVD Combo |
Case | Cooler Master CM Stacker 830 |
Motherboards | MSI K9A2 Platinum |
Operating System | Windows Vista-64 Ultimate SP1 |
. |
DVNation provided the latest Memoright MR25.2-032S GT drive for comparison in our HD Tune tests. This drive features 120/120 MB/s read/write specifications and with a total of eight of these drives on-hand, we will have a special RAID performance article shortly. We will also update this article with results from this drive in the near future; in the meantime, we are using the Mtron 32GB SSD for application benchmark comparisons as it features specifications near the Samsung/OCZ offerings.
Our testbed uses an MSI HD 3870 video card to ensure that our graphics benchmarks are not GPU bound. Our video tests are run at 1280x1024 at High Quality settings. All of our tests run in an enclosed case with a dual optical/hard drive setup to reflect a moderately loaded system platform. We fully patch the OS and load a clean drive image for each platform in order to make sure that driver conflicts are minimal.
We format before each test run and complete five tests on each drive in order to ensure consistency in the benchmark results. We remove the high and low scores and report the remaining score. The Vista swap file is set to a static 2048MB and we clear the prefetch folder after each benchmark.
Software Test Suite
With the variety of disk drive benchmarks available, we need a means of comparing the true performance of the hard drives in real world applications. Our abbreviated benchmark suite for today's article will include:
- HD
Tune
- Thermals
- WinRAR
- Nero Recode
- Company of Heroes: Opposing Fronts
- Crysis
- PCMark Vantage
Our benchmark suite is suited for desktop applications. Our next installment will feature a notebook-oriented suite.
38 Comments
View All Comments
tim851 - Friday, May 16, 2008 - link
Seeing as all drives are quite close in load times I think it's safe to assume, that we've reach the apex and the load times are pretty much bottlenecked by CPU speed now.Most real world application performance numbers are pretty close these days, there aren't any dead slow hard disks anymore. Flash won't bring us more speed, but less power draw and noise.
FITCamaro - Friday, May 16, 2008 - link
I got a pair of 74GB Raptors for $150. I'm quite happy with my load times. Even in the Age of Conan beta, my load times were pretty quick.araczynski - Friday, May 16, 2008 - link
nothing mainstream about a $1000 64gb drive.piroroadkill - Friday, May 16, 2008 - link
I agree, it's definitely good, but it's not $1000 goodJarredWalton - Friday, May 16, 2008 - link
More "mainstream" than a $4000 64GB SSD. :)dingetje - Friday, May 16, 2008 - link
sorry, this is about as mainstream to the st0rage industry as brasilian fart p0rn is to the p0rn market.nice article by the way, thanks ;)
AssBall - Friday, May 16, 2008 - link
Yes, but the key is that now you can store and access your fart Pr0n even faster!retrospooty - Friday, May 16, 2008 - link
dang... I didnt even know there was such a thing as brazillian fart porn. I need to get out more !