Far Cry 2 Dissected: Massive Amounts of Performance Data
by Derek Wilson on November 21, 2008 5:30 AM EST- Posted in
- GPUs
Testing with 4xAA Enabled (Custom Demo)
Running with 4xAA is much more taxing on the cards. It is our opinion that AA in Far Cry 2 isn't highly necessary. The world is fairly low contrast, and with all the effects aliasing is not incredibly noticeable. It is present, of course, but AA isn't a necessity like it can be in other games. Especially at high resolution and small pixel sizes. At the very high end, or in working multi-GPU configurations, go ahead and turn on 4xAA. If you happen to be one of those gamers who really loves AA even when aliasing isn't terribly noticeable in a game, remember that 4xAA with Very High quality settings will generally perform about the same as Ultra High quality with no antialiasing. Of course, this is a trade off. We don't think it's worth it, but what looks good to one person doesn't always look good to another.
The minimum graphics requirement to run with Ultra High quality and 4xAA will be a GeForce 9800 GT or a Radeon HD 4830, but these cards will only get you barely playable framerates at 1024x768.
While the GeForce GTX 280 does regain it's lead over the Radeon HD 4870 1GB in this test, the AMD part still leads its competitors (the GTX 260 cards) at all playable resolutions. And once again, the 512MB part falls behind the GeForce GTX 260. The 512MB 4870 ran incredibly poorly at 2560x1600, though only the GTX 280 and SLI solutions remained playable.
The cheapest playable card at 1024x768 with these settings is the GeForce 9800 GT.
The cheapest playable card at 1280x1024 with these settings is the Radeon HD 4850.
The cheapest playable card at 1680x1050 with these settings is the GeForce GTX 260.
The cheapest playable card at 1920x1200 with these settings is the GeForce GTX 260.
The cheapest playable card at 2560x1600 with these settings is the GeForce GTX 280.
Facebook
Twitter
RSS
78 Comments
View All Comments
toyota - Friday, November 21, 2008 - link
I have a GTX260 with 180.48 drivers and it stutters in the benchmark and in the game. theres a little hitch even while walking around like in STALKER but not as severe. my 4670 stuttered much less in the benchmark and basically zero in the game so this is NOT an ATI only issue.Goty - Friday, November 21, 2008 - link
You really can't blame AMD for having issues with the 8.10 drivers, they probably weren't given access to the game until very shortly before it was released (if at all) as a result of it being a part of the TWIMTBP program. If you consider the fact that work on the 8.11s probably began sometime a month or so before, too, there's even reason for issues there. Watch the 8.12s come out and AMD jump ahead significantly in performance (not that anyone will care by then, though).Genx87 - Monday, November 24, 2008 - link
The beta testers for the game manufacturer have access to the cards and drivers. ATI knew about this well before the release of the game.ashegam - Friday, November 21, 2008 - link
why is there so little difference between the 192 260 and the 216 260?I swear I've seen reviews that put that card a good 10-20% above it's older counterpart.
PrinceGaz - Saturday, November 22, 2008 - link
A good 10-20%? I very much doubt that, given that stock original GTX260's and the Core 216 later versions differ only in having 9 instead of 8 shader banks, and the equivalent increase in texture units.Under ideal conditions, that would result in a 12.5% performance increase, but in practice is likely to be little more than 5% or so as many other factors affect performance. Anything above 12.5% improvement with a Core 216 would only be possible with a driver tweak which favoured it, or unless the Core 216 was overclocked. An improvement of 5% or so over the original GTX260 is what you should expect.
CEO Ballmer - Friday, November 21, 2008 - link
It does not work on Macs!http://fakesteveballmer.blogspot.com">http://fakesteveballmer.blogspot.com
CrystalBay - Sunday, November 23, 2008 - link
Yeah, I Hate It, Ubisoft should be banned to making chess games for Macs.Anyhow Firing Squad backs up Dereks benches , pretty much ...
chizow - Friday, November 21, 2008 - link
Seems to be missing, platform used, drivers used etc. I'm guessing the 180.48s weren't used, as those results seem to be off for NV parts. If they weren't, that distinction should probably be made.phatmhatg - Friday, November 21, 2008 - link
nice article. very well supported.im still going with the 260 192 though.
its just about as good as the 4870 1gb. what, im losing fewer than 10fps at 19x12?
its about 60-75 cheaper. i got my 260 for 214 after rebate. free shipping.
and heres the funny part - it came with far cry 2. so i save about 50 going with the 260 over the 4870 1gb AND i save another 50 by getting the game with it. thats 100 in savings. again - for about max 10fps less?
lastly - driver issues. i dont JUST play farcry2. i play other games. just seems - and maybe im wrong and maybe things will change - that nvidia either avoids problems with games and/or fixes them better/more quickly than amd does. i dont want to have to wait or mess with things to get my game working. i want it working when i install it.
so there are 4 good reasons to go with the 260 - cheaper, get game with card, not much slower at all, and better drivers in other games.
kr7400 - Tuesday, December 2, 2008 - link
Can you please fucking die? Preferably by getting crushed to death in a garbage compactor, by getting your face cut to ribbons with a pocketknife, your head cracked open with a baseball bat, your stomach sliced open and your entrails spilled out, and your eyeballs ripped out of their sockets. *beep* bitch
Shut the *beep* up f aggot, before you get your face bashed in and cut to ribbons, and your throat slit.