Final Words
Without DRC, the Doede USB to I2S converter gets my vote as a fantastic all in one solution. It's neutral, balanced and almost defies logic with its simplistic approach. The detraction against it is that using a single TDA1543 results in an output level that is simply too low when DRC is applied. Doede's solution to this is to stack up to eight TDA1543s in parallel to boost output current. I'm not sure if that approach appeals to me, but it may be worth a shot if you'd like to try this DAC out.
The Opus's strengths are in its spatial presentation and rendering of distance between instruments. The tubes do add a touch of warmth to the presentation, which is probably needed as this DAC pretty much strips everything from a recording and throws it into the soundscape. It's great if you've got a high quality recording, but on discs that have been butchered by recording engineers or those containing low quality digital samples the presentation is ruthless. Things may be different with the Ballsie output stage, though I'd expect the spatial element to remain prominent. I don't miss the modified Pioneer at all though, the Opus is far better when using the PC as a transport.
It is remarkable how little has changed in the audio world over the last 50 years or so. Some of us are still beguiled by vacuum tubes and open baffle speakers and trying to keep signal path complexity to a bare minimum (not mentioning any names). Others think that vinyl playback will never be surpassed by the ones and zeroes of digital. If ever there was a case against that argument, DRC has to be it. Yes, the PC is not only great for data storage and retrieval but also a device that can apply all manner of room adjustments while enhancing the listening experience rather than detracting from it.
Tie the USB DAC kits together with DRC and it all becomes the real deal. While PC based correction is not as easy to use as the offerings from Behringer and TacT, the PC software is scalable providing greater potential for expansion at a later date. Multi channel digital crossover integrated DRC is still out of reach for the masses though - especially if you want to apply correction to movie playback. You'll need all manner of plug-ins and the patience to set everything up properly as it's certainly not easy. Moreover, the cost of an entire system to cater to all this still falls in the "buy now, pay forever" territory for many.
For two-channel playback though, given the choice between purchasing a new audio component or the chance to buy something that can perform DRC, I'd pick DRC every single time. It's that darn good.
Facebook
Twitter
RSS
114 Comments
View All Comments
kleshodnic - Monday, December 1, 2008 - link
Uh, just go digital out (TOS/link or HDMI) to a receiver and let ther receiver do the DAC'ing.Want a better DAC? Buy a better receiver. Not only will you get the better DAC, you will get a ton of other great features with a higher end receiver.
All this talk about computer audio is assuming that you would want to come analog out from the computer. WHY?
phusg - Tuesday, December 2, 2008 - link
It would be a lot easier I agree, but AFAIK only really expensive top-end receivers can challenge the analog out you can get from a quality consumer audio card with upgraded opamps, especially when it comes to stereo music. They are also not usually moddable. Can you link to a review of receiver with audiophile quality stereo DAC?pedobosz - Monday, December 1, 2008 - link
an interesting place to publish such an article. Have you thought of perhaps submitting to Stereophile or The Absolute Sound ? I'm sure you are just trying to raise the awareness of the PC crowd to the possibilities of great audio, but reading through the other replys, I think you are preaching to the deaf......with the exception of the Martin Logan fellow.jnmfox - Monday, December 1, 2008 - link
Computers and audio (mostly Home Theater) are my main two hobbies. I agree this article doesn't fit here at anandtech.com. I've never understood the esoteric audio crowd. If you want quality audio information go to audioholics.com or other reputable audio sites.jabber - Monday, December 1, 2008 - link
I have to say the article and lengths gone to are way over the top for what in most cases is required.The kits combined with the PC audio side is way esoteric too.
Well intentioned but sledgehammer to crack nut.......
haukionkannel - Monday, December 1, 2008 - link
Hmmm... When we talk about HiFi nothing is "bit over".For a hifi system this was relative middle range solution. The biggest consern, if you have to find one, is that the speakers will most propably have the biggest effect an the hearing experience. These type of speakers ar not meat to be the most precise in their "room" picture. And I don't say that it's a bad thing! They are good speakers. Some studio monitors would maybe be better for testing the PC as an "Hifi" sound source, because they try not to affect the sound at same way as some High end HiFi speakers, but again it's more of a matter of taste. For example Genelec speakers sound good for Vocal based music. These in here are better in music where accuracy is not so important. So it allso depends on what music you like to listen to. Just like someone above said.
I would like to see how the sound compares between good Hifi cd-player and a PC. With the same music piece and speakers. This set with those tubes can make the sound varmer, that is good for some not so good mp3 files. More accurate monitor speakers and normal amplifier, will most propably reveal the difference between good cd and not so good PC based mp3 more clearly.
Most people who are really interested in HiFi systems spent even more money than in test to their system. The real guestion is that is the PC good enough soundsource for system like that.
jabber - Monday, December 1, 2008 - link
Yes but real high end hifi is really usually bought by what Top Gear would call 'cocks'. Folks that just see money and how much they spent rather then just enjoying music. $50000 hifi systems geared to playing just 10 specialist audiophile CDs just screams "I've led a sad and lonely life!" to me.Show me a $1000 system surrounded by piles of CDs and LPs, now thats an exciting system!
The readership of this site I would say on the whole would have far more modest hifi setups.
Once you spend so much on a hi-fi you fall into the trap of listening to the equipment rather then the music itself.
Spivonious - Monday, December 1, 2008 - link
Spending that much time and effort to listen to pop music is just about the silliest thing I've ever heard.At least put something on that will work the equipment, like a Beethoven string quartet, or a Bach choral work.
And you never even touched on the issue of vinyl vs digital. To my ears, vinyl sounds so much more organic than the plasticy sound of CDs, even through a $15,000 tube-driven stereo system.
Rajinder Gill - Monday, December 1, 2008 - link
Actually, I'm just listening to some Vaughan Williams right now. Just because there's no mention in the article does not mean to say I live without classical pieces.Peace...
Hyperion1400 - Monday, December 1, 2008 - link
Amen to that. There is no set style of music for audiophiles. I personally enjoy metal and classic punk (bad religion,sex pistols etc.) as well as a mix of classical composers(I have always had a strange love for Beethoven's 9th after watching Neon Genesis Evangelion)Also, will you be doing a review of the X-fi Elite Pro or will you be primarily dealing with external hardware. I know I will most likely be shunned for mentioning such a thing in the same post as (vicariously) declaring myself an audiophile, but I absolutely love mine. Without that card and my Senhiesser HD 650s, I don't think I could listen to my music/games the same way again(no pun intended)