NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295: Leading the Pack

100 Comments

View All Comments

• MadMan007 - Monday, January 12, 2009 - link

  The HD4000s were and are certainly great bang for the buck but not using too much power...not so much. The idle power draw was behind NV and the load power draw is generally in proportion to performance.

• SiliconDoc - Monday, January 12, 2009 - link

  The GTX260 BEATS the 4870 in power consumption- as in IT'S LOWER for the GTX260.
  Just like the GTX295 BEATS the 4870x2 in power useage.
  In the 260/4870 case, full 3d was within 1-3 watts, and in 2d/idle the 260 was 30 watts lower - taking the CROWN.
  Similar in this case- although NVidia declares the 298 watts max, which red fans love to site - the actual draw is less- as sites that have tested all show.
  Oh well. More FUD from the reds will be all over the place.
  Tonight I learned that this 2 gpu thing on one card with framerates like the raved and glroified 4870x2 are just one big waste without 2560x rez - but before the 4870x2 was praised beyond measure for actually winning very often JUST THAT SINGLE HIGHEST REZZ ni the benchmarks.. lol
  It's like politics, total spin and twist, and forget anything else.

• SlyNine - Tuesday, January 13, 2009 - link

  OK you're an Nvidia fanboi, We get it.
  
  The 4870 was the better deal. get over it.

• SiliconDoc - Tuesday, January 13, 2009 - link

  Merely a fan of the truth. Is the truth that hard for you tools to face ?
  Apparently a lot of freaks have decided to face the truth now = as in get a 30" or forget this level of card, which DOES INCLUDE the 4870x2 - only even more so - as you see disabling x2 with that card is a no go...
  So it took NVidia releasing the slightly better card to wake up the ATI fanboys. 6 months of lies and fanning their red flamnes all over the place, and now Nvidia has brought most of them to their senses.
  " Noone needs a card this good"- is the half hearted response from the red tools now. Or better yet, since the 4870x2 just dropped from 500 bucks to lower pricepoint because it got slayed, now they want the no profiles, driver issue red piece of crap, anyway.
  Whatever...
  Now, WOULD YOU LIKE TO REFUTE ANYTHING ? Including the power consumption I brought up ? Please, you're on the internet, go look, before you make a fool of yourself calling me a fanboy.
  GO LOOK.

• kk650 - Wednesday, January 14, 2009 - link

  too bad a fatarse burger eating yank like yourself didn't die on 9/11 along with several thousand of your fucking countrymen, you cunt. Now go die of a heart attack, retard

• DJMiggy - Wednesday, January 14, 2009 - link

  That comment was very much uncalled for. You are a very crass individual. I hope you never have to lose a friend or loved one to something that could have been prevented and wish you and your family well.

• kk650 - Tuesday, January 13, 2009 - link

  He's a fucking moron

• mhouck - Monday, January 12, 2009 - link

  I have to agree with the others that this article was disappointing. I would think that the nvidia dual GPU would be compared to their last dual GPU the GX2. I was really expecting to see a comparison between the last generation solution and this generation. Maybe a look at driver support for the GX2 and how its doing as compared to ATI's driver support for their X2's. From all the articles I've read, we are constantly asking whether the driver support will be there to make dual GPU's in SLI and Crossfire worthwhile. WELL, TAKE A LOOK AND REPORT BACK! These solutions have been out for a year now!! Maybe I expected too much. :-(

• MadMan007 - Monday, January 12, 2009 - link

  Which GTX 260 is included in the charts, GTX 260-192 or GTX 260-216?

• BSMonitor - Monday, January 12, 2009 - link

  Don't you guys usually show us the system power consumption charts for these hefty GPU's? Curious where is stands on that front against 260, 280 SLI and 4870x2.