Call of Duty World at War Analysis




1680x1050    1920x1200    2560x1600


NVIDIA's GT200 parts in 3-way SLI rule this benchmark, while the GeForce 9800 GTX+ holds its own. This test definitely shows NVIDIA in a good light across all three resolutions.




1680x1050    1920x1200    2560x1600


The apparent system limitation on single cards does inflate the scaling a little bit here, but there's no doubt that lots of scaling is happening. This time we don't see scaling above the theoretical maximum of 200%, but we do see some big gains. While NVIDIA hardware does do well at low resolution, the best total 1 to 3 GPU scaling at 1920x1200 and 2560x160 goes to AMD.




1680x1050    1920x1200    2560x1600


The story doesn't change much when comparing scaling from 2 to 3 GPUs. We get very decent scaling rates with the 4870 1GB getting dangerously close to the theoretical maximum of 50% at 2560x1600. In general though, CoD:WaW does a good job taking advantage of available GPU horsepower whether it's 1, 2 or 3 GPUs.




1680x1050    1920x1200    2560x1600


Below 2560x1600 the 9800 GTX+ 3-way option actually has decent value (comparatively) in this test. At the highest resolution, the 9800 GTX+ falls a few spots. Again, of the 3-way options, NVIDIA's two highest end options have the lowest value of cards that get something near playable framerates.

We still see lots of two way and single card options that get decent performance leading the way in value over the much more expensive 3-way configurations even at the highest resolution.

In general, with any of these setups, performance won't be an issue below 2560x1600, and even then only the slowest couple might warrant skipping.

Age of Conan Analysis Crysis Warhead Analysis
Comments Locked

46 Comments

View All Comments

  • 7Enigma - Thursday, February 26, 2009 - link

    Derek,

    Please keep the new way. I was one of the proponents of the zero rating after the last article and it shows nicely what can and can't handle a given resolution. Sure you can turn down the eye candy, but that's not the point of the article...especially when you are talking about 3-way.

    We could just turn all the settings down to medium and a single 4850 would be the value king! (/sarcasm)
  • Antman56 - Wednesday, February 25, 2009 - link

    I think demonstrating crossfire using 4850s with 1 GB of ram each would have created a "sweet" price/performance result.

    These 4850s show us what happens when there isn't enough memory to compliment a video card's processing potential.
  • Spivonious - Wednesday, February 25, 2009 - link

    I find it interesting that the 4870 512MB leads the value charts at "normal" resolutions (still way higher than I run).

    I think as a follow-up to this series you should look at playability statistics and see if getting anything more than the 4870 512MB is worth it at 1920x1200 and below.
  • fixxxer0 - Wednesday, February 25, 2009 - link

    only if both girls are hot
  • StraightPipe - Wednesday, February 25, 2009 - link

    only one of the girls needs to be hot, the other will be so busy licking your balls it wont make a difference.
  • Jansen - Wednesday, February 25, 2009 - link

    And if it is not a "Devil's 3-way"...

    That's with two guys.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now