Call of Duty: World at War


While not our favorite Call of Duty game, World at War certainly improves upon the graphics quality of previous versions. We play through the first few minutes of the Semper FI level by following a repeatable course and capture our performance results with FRAPS. We set the various graphics and texture options to their highest settings with AA at 2x and AF at 8x.

Call of Duty: World at War - Semper FI

This game is not particularly hard on either the GPU or CPU, but we do hit a hard cap at 94fps. At 1680x1050 the Phenom II X3 720BE (henceforth, 720BE) is around 4% slower in average frame rates than the X4 940 in single card and CrossFire X mode due to a 200MHz clock speed advantage in this game. When overclocked, the 720BE equals the X4 940, although both trail the Intel platforms by 3% in average frame rates and 18% in minimum frame rates.

Adding a second card for CrossFire operation improves average frame rates by 11%, but minimum frame rates decrease 14% for the 720BE. Overclocking the 720BE resulted in a 6% improvement in average frame rates and 35% in minimum frame rates in CrossFire performance.

Call of Duty: World at War - Semper FI

We have roughly the same performance results at 1920x1200 when comparing the platforms. The Phenom II X3 720BE is competitive with the Intel platforms and X4 940 in single card and CrossFire operation, though minimum frame rates in CrossFire mode trail the other solutions up to 17%. Once we overclock the CPUs, the minimum frame rate is about 15% lower on the Phenom II processors compared to the Intel products.

Installing a second card for CrossFire operation improves average frame rates by 25% and minimum frame rates increase 5% for the 720BE.  Overclocking the 720BE resulted in a 7% improvement in average frame rates and 37% in minimum frame rates.

We did not notice any difference in game play quality at either resolution between the platforms after playing through several of the levels. Each platform offered a very smooth and fluid gaming experience. We thought the higher minimum frame rates on the Intel systems would be noticeable during the heavy action scenes in the jungle, but honestly, we could not tell the systems apart during testing.  The 720BE provided an equal gaming experience to the other processors with our settings. 

The Setup... Crysis Warhead
Comments Locked

59 Comments

View All Comments

  • moriz - Sunday, March 29, 2009 - link

    you first.
  • TA152H - Saturday, March 28, 2009 - link

    You're worse than he is.

    What an ugly, witless, post. Not that his was much better.
  • JonnyDough - Saturday, March 28, 2009 - link

    Was yours any better? Maybe we should just continue the trend of garbage not worth reading with my post.

    asdfjkl; MmmK? /end all the trash talk
  • ap90033 - Wednesday, April 1, 2009 - link

    Wow words cannot explain the total lack of intelligence your posts show you troglodyte.
  • TA152H - Saturday, March 28, 2009 - link

    Holy hypocrisy Batman!

    Actually, I didn't attack him directly, or tell him to commit suicide, or anything like that, I just attacked his post.

    You, on the other hand, did exactly what you criticized. Couldn't you see that?
  • Griswold - Saturday, March 28, 2009 - link

    Ok, I'll say it: You all score equally high on the fool-scoreboard.
  • Clauzii - Saturday, March 28, 2009 - link

    Amen to that!
  • poohbear - Sunday, March 29, 2009 - link

    to the OP, all the power to u for saving money. Nothing wrong w/ mATX at all if u dont need all the features. I'd go w/a m_ATX anyday if it meant i could get a 4890!!
  • Clauzii - Sunday, March 29, 2009 - link

    Yes, I forgot to write 'except OP', but what went on in between was hillarious :)

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now