Gaming Under Windows

To Apple’s credit, the Radeon HD 4870 is a respectable GPU option on the Mac Pro. My only complaints there are with regards to price and memory size. Apple charges $200 for the upgrade as a BTO option while configuring your Mac Pro, but $349 if you want to buy it later. To make matters worse, the card only has 512MB of memory which is better than the 128MB cards that Apple used to ship but still too small for an OS that makes good use of video memory.

While there are a few respectable gaming titles on the Mac, most gamers will want to boot into Windows for all gaming. You could keep a second (PC) video card in your Mac Pro and just swap monitor outputs when you want to game or snag one of these EVGA GTX 285s. As a gaming card under Windows, it’ll be the fastest you can get through official channels.

I ran our standard Crysis Warhead tests on the Mac Pro to show how the GTX 285 and Radeon HD 4870 stack up:

The performance advantage ranges from 17% at 1680 x 1050 to 35% at 2560 x 1600.

I was curious to see how my 2.93GHz Mac Pro stacked up to our 3.2GHz Core i7 GPU testbed so I compared the results:

Crysis Warhead 1680 x 1050 1900 x 1200 2560 x 1600
Apple Mac Pro 2009 - 2 x 2.93GHz Xeon X5570 37.8 fps 32.9 fps 22.2 fps
AnandTech GPU Testbed - 1 x Core i7 965 (3.20GHz) 38.5 fps 32.8 fps 22.4 fps

 

It looks like the numbers are pretty comparable, so if you’d like to see a more detailed performance comparison between the Radeon HD 4870 and the GTX 285 feel free to read through any of our recent GPU articles. The numbers should apply to the Mac Pro just fine.

OS X Apps That Need a Fast GPU Power Consumption & Final Words
Comments Locked

48 Comments

View All Comments

  • robco - Saturday, July 18, 2009 - link

    We ordered a set directly from ATI - they sell them as spare parts for $13 each.

    http://shop.ati.com/product.asp?sku=3280778">http://shop.ati.com/product.asp?sku=3280778
  • Etern205 - Friday, July 17, 2009 - link

    I wonder how many Mac idiots are now going to boast how cool their are to own a Mac with a GTX 285.



  • KeithP - Saturday, July 18, 2009 - link

    Don't worry, as far as idiocy goes I am sure you will still reign supreme.

    -KeithP
  • JordanNOLA - Saturday, July 18, 2009 - link

    LOL
  • fmaste - Friday, July 17, 2009 - link

    Why not using both the GTX285 and the GT 120 that comes standard to have more video memory. Is it possible? Has enough power connectors to have two GPUs?
  • Etern205 - Friday, July 17, 2009 - link

    Putting these in SLI will not share the ram across both cards, they're still independent. Also it's a waste to put a lowend along with a highend. Oh crap, I should not have said that as Apple would probably market how good it is to run SLI in this kind of setup and for them to enable SLI at a cost of just $199.
  • DigitalFreak - Friday, July 17, 2009 - link

    "OMG, OMG! I don't know what this card is. What do I do? What do I do!"
  • fibbeh - Friday, July 17, 2009 - link

    Lol, I was thinking the same thing.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now