AMD’s Radeon HD 5850: The Other Shoe Drops
by Ryan Smith on September 30, 2009 12:00 AM EST- Posted in
- GPUs
Crysis: Warhead
Kicking things off, we’ll start with Crysis: Warhead. Warhead is still the single most demanding game in our arsenal, with cards continuing to struggle to put out a playable frame rate with everything turned up.
With Crysis: Warhead being so GPU limited, we see a pretty standard breakdown of GPU performance. The 5850 loses only to the 5870 for single-GPU cards. The 5850 Crossfire on the other hand gives us some surprising results, losing to the GTX 285 in SLI in spite of a single 5850 beating a single GTX 285. Clearly NVIDIA is getting better multi-GPU scaling out of Warhead than AMD is.
Facebook
Twitter
RSS
95 Comments
View All Comments
MadMan007 - Wednesday, September 30, 2009 - link
Should have done HAWX in DX 10.1 mode then the HD5850 > GTX 285 sweep would have been complete. Or to flip it around, enable PhysX (lol) on some games.MadMan007 - Wednesday, September 30, 2009 - link
I have to point this out because it's something I've now seen on two websites and it irks me a little bit just like 'solid state capacitors' does. In the last sentence on page one the plural of die in this case is dies not dice. Someone didn't edit this carefully!Ryan Smith - Wednesday, September 30, 2009 - link
If you search our archives, Anand has discussed this in depth. It's dice.papapapapapapapababy - Wednesday, September 30, 2009 - link
btw, this card is powerless against "the way is meant to be played"nvidia keeps bribing developers left and right, ATI does nothing
(except boring sideshow penis wars), meanwhile the poor ATI users cant seem to play NFS SHIFT 640 x 480, all set to low, ( my -rebranded- 9800 does it great btw) + there is no in-game selective AA available to any ATI Radeon user in Batman, (another TWIMTBP game) + it looks like empty crap with all the shit nvidia - removed ( yes, really no smoke? no papers? no flags? not even static flags? what about GRAW? it used to work fine on reg cpus...)
papapapapapapapababy - Wednesday, September 30, 2009 - link
my "prototype" RV740 @ AC-S1 is better...
Core Clock: 875
Idle temp: 29C
Noise: 0db
TDP: 80W(+)
+ it doesn't look like the 60's Batmobile
AnnonymousCoward - Thursday, October 1, 2009 - link
What, like this one?http://student.dcu.ie/~lawlesc4/Batmobile%20%28TV%...">http://student.dcu.ie/~lawlesc4/Batmobile%20%28TV%...
ipay - Wednesday, September 30, 2009 - link
Except it doesn't hav DX11, so it's not better. Go troll somewhere else.strikeback03 - Wednesday, September 30, 2009 - link
I suppose we probably have to wait for the consumer driver release to know for sure, but how is the stability of these? The only two AMD cards I have direct experience with have both had driver issues, so that is the one factor that would keep me from considering one of the lower-powered versions of this architecture once they are released.Jamahl - Wednesday, September 30, 2009 - link
It is you who had the issue not the drivers. That is why millions of others have ati's without driver issues.strikeback03 - Wednesday, September 30, 2009 - link
Yeah, I definitely think closing my laptop lid and expecting it to have the same resolution set when I reopen is my fault *rolls eyes*.