Far Cry 2

Featuring fantastic visuals courtesy of the Dunia Engine, this game also features one of the most impressive benchmark tools we have seen in a PC game. For single GPU results we set the performance feature set to Very High, graphics to High, and enable DX10 with 2xAA.

Gaming Performance - Far Cry 2 - i5 661 CPU @ Stock

Gaming Performance - Far Cry 2 - i5 661 CPU @ 4GHz

Warhammer 40K: Dawn of War II

We are big fans of the Warhammer franchise, especially Dawn of War II. One of the latest RTS games in our library is also one of the more demanding titles on both the CPU and GPU. We crank all options to Ultra, enable AA, and then run the built-in performance benchmark for our result.

Gaming Performance - Dawn Of War II - i5 661 CPU @ Stock

Gaming Performance - Dawn Of War II - i5 661 CPU @ 4GHz

AutoCAD 2010 x64—Cadalyst 2008

We utilize AutoCAD 2010 x64 and the Cadalyst Labs 5 benchmark.

Application Performance - AutoCAD 2010 x64 - i5 661 CPU @ Stock

The Cadalyst benchmark is sensitive towards HDD performance, showing a fair amount of swing between boards. We're not sure on the exact cause of variance between boards of the same chipset, but MSI clearly have an advantage (using the H55 chipset). As expected, there is a small boost using ASUS' SATA 6G ports with our OCZ Vertex SSD.

Test Setup and Power System Benchmarks
Comments Locked

56 Comments

View All Comments

  • jackylman - Monday, February 22, 2010 - link

    First, thank you for the detailed information on fan control. I've made a few comments about that in the past and it's nice to see that category now seems to be part of a standard Atech mobo review.

    I'm not in the market for a Clarkdale platform, but if I was, this article would be very useful.
  • Shadowmaster625 - Monday, February 22, 2010 - link

    A lot of people are talking about new motherboards being released before they are ready. And for good reason. Why bother? Why not go and buy a well known and well established motherboard like the GIGABYTE GA-G31M-ES2L for $45 and drop in a E5200 and a quiet GT 220 or 5450? Overclock it to a modest 3 GHz and it will surely smoke this H55/H57 garbage in all the gaming benchmarks, for a LOT cheaper.

    I do not understand the value in this entire product line. Why do you not compare these with the option I just mentioned? I dont care about how intel wastes their monopoly advantage. If hardware from a year ago is cheaper and better than this crap they are shoveling out now, then it is your responsibility to tell us that.
  • TrackSmart - Tuesday, February 23, 2010 - link

    Point taken, but as readers, isn't it great that we don't have to buy all the newest, most expensive hardware to find out how it runs? And the problems with it? We can just read articles like this one.

    The Anandtech folks *do* write articles showing budget parts that offer exceptional value (via overclocking or unlocking cores). This just isn't one of those articles.
  • Rajinder Gill - Monday, February 22, 2010 - link

    Hi,

    I think the E5300 was benchmarked against Clarkdale here in our chipset/CPU launch articles.

    http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?...">http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?...


    regards
    Raja
  • Taft12 - Monday, February 22, 2010 - link

    Interestingly, a tasty OC on an E5300 will push the benches up towards the E8600 in those charts, that is to say, faster than Clarkdale.

    OK, so an E5300 won't get quite THAT far, but it shows you that Clarkdale is marginally better than Wolfdale at best and not at all worth the price.
  • lukeevanssi - Saturday, June 26, 2010 - link

    if anybody want to know more about it so plz visit this link:-
    http://www.healthproductreviewers.com/force-factor...
    there is a lot off knowledge about this product
  • TrackSmart - Monday, February 22, 2010 - link

    Thank you for pushing Gigabyte on the AHCI issue! Can you ask them about their 790-series boards, too? I'm frustrated with the lack of AHCI support on my new GA-790-XTA-UD4 motherboard. There's a 30-45 second delay in initializing SATA hard disks when returning from sleep mode. This causes Windows 7 to blue screen. The only fix is to revert to IDE mode for all drives. I wasted 2 days trouble-shooting this only to find out its an unaddressed problem with AHCI support on this motherboard (and many others).
  • Lukas - Monday, February 22, 2010 - link

    This may not be the solution you're looking for, but it fixes the bluescreen at least:

    http://support.microsoft.com/kb/977178/#top">http://support.microsoft.com/kb/977178/#top
  • TrackSmart - Monday, February 22, 2010 - link

    Thank you for the tip. I tried the hotfix.

    It's funny because the hotfix definitely prevents total operating system failure (i.e. BSOD). However, Windows takes up to a full minute to become responsive when resuming from sleep mode. Presumably the OS is waiting as long as it needs to for the SATA boot drive to become responsive again.

    I will continue running in Native IDE mode for now, since losing 1% system performance is less irritating than waiting forever for my system to become responsive.

    *** It would be nice if AMD or Gigabyte addressed the true problem, but I won't hold my breath. I still haven't heard back from their customer support about this problem and it's been a few days. Not even a "we'll get back to you soon" message. Nada.
  • Taft12 - Monday, February 22, 2010 - link

    Great article Raja, I also appreciate the detail of the good and bad!

    I have a question for you or anyone else who might know - you mentioned ASUS dropping the MSRP of their H55 board at the start of the article... Where can I look up what the different vendors MSRP's are? Intel and AMD have made it quite easy to find out the 1K unit price of their CPUs on their own sites, but I haven't seen anything similar for motherboard vendors. Is there an authoritative, frequently-updated source?

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now