Far Cry 2

Featuring fantastic visuals courtesy of the Dunia Engine, this game also features one of the most impressive benchmark tools we have seen in a PC game. For single GPU results we set the performance feature set to Very High, graphics to High, and enable DX10 with 2xAA.

Gaming Performance - Far Cry 2 - i5 661 CPU @ Stock

Gaming Performance - Far Cry 2 - i5 661 CPU @ 4GHz

Warhammer 40K: Dawn of War II

We are big fans of the Warhammer franchise, especially Dawn of War II. One of the latest RTS games in our library is also one of the more demanding titles on both the CPU and GPU. We crank all options to Ultra, enable AA, and then run the built-in performance benchmark for our result.

Gaming Performance - Dawn Of War II - i5 661 CPU @ Stock

Gaming Performance - Dawn Of War II - i5 661 CPU @ 4GHz

AutoCAD 2010 x64—Cadalyst 2008

We utilize AutoCAD 2010 x64 and the Cadalyst Labs 5 benchmark.

Application Performance - AutoCAD 2010 x64 - i5 661 CPU @ Stock

The Cadalyst benchmark is sensitive towards HDD performance, showing a fair amount of swing between boards. We're not sure on the exact cause of variance between boards of the same chipset, but MSI clearly have an advantage (using the H55 chipset). As expected, there is a small boost using ASUS' SATA 6G ports with our OCZ Vertex SSD.

Test Setup and Power System Benchmarks
Comments Locked

56 Comments

View All Comments

  • 7Enigma - Monday, February 22, 2010 - link

    Taft,

    Why does the MSRP really matter? Unless you are looking to buy in bulk, I don't really see what the benefit would be. For instance the Intel 80gig SSD has been inflated for months now. It's still a great product, and I don't know why someone wouldn't buy something if the price was higher than MSRP. Many electronic products sell below MSRP, and IMO that does't make them any better or worse.

    More importantly than MSRP in my opinion is shopping around to get the best price at any given point. 15-30min of googling around to various E-tailers will give you a good ballpark of the price.
  • Rajinder Gill - Monday, February 22, 2010 - link

    Hi,

    Unfortunately, I haven't seen or heard of any such resource from any of the sub-vendors - I usually have to fire off emails to ask. I agree with you though, it would be nice to see the figures posted on vendor websites.

    regards
    Raja
  • willsonjone - Tuesday, March 22, 2011 - link

    Samsung, a respected brand keeps introducing mobile phones that match today’s speed and technology. Samsung has gone great lengths this time as it has received impressive reviews for its new Galaxy S 4G which happens to be the first 4G Phone with 21+ Mbps speeds.

    Samsung Galaxy S 4G
  • Kid98 - Monday, February 22, 2010 - link

    (ASUS is using a 188 amp capable VRM vs a guessed 110~120amp VRM on the Gigabyte H55/H57 boards, so we'd pick the ASUS boards for Lynnfield CPU overclocking)

    Looks like the units used to express the capabilities of the VRM's is incorrect, otherwise I am going to need a really large PSU to run them....

    Kid
  • Swivelguy2 - Monday, February 22, 2010 - link

    That's 100+ amps delivered at a Vcore of ~1 volt, not 100+ amps drawn from the 12v rail.
  • Earballs - Monday, February 22, 2010 - link

    I don't understand these Farcry 2 benchmark results.

    How is this score against the i5 750 being calculated? Did you test all these boards with that processor then average it? :S

    If the first result is the 661@stock and the second the 661@4Ghz, why is the comparison to the i5 750 number not the same in both charts? What changed for the 750? The graphics settings appear to be the same.
  • Rajinder Gill - Monday, February 22, 2010 - link

    The 750 was benched on the EVGA P55 FTW board. Same drives, same drivers, same GPU, same patch version of FC2. Not sure why Lynn (4core) does worse in this bench.

    later
    Raja
  • Earballs - Monday, February 22, 2010 - link

    Okay thanks, but that doesn't explain this:

    If the first result is the 661@stock and the second the 661@4Ghz, why is the comparison to the i5 750 number not the same in both charts? What changed for the 750? The graphics settings appear to be the same.
  • Rajinder Gill - Monday, February 22, 2010 - link

    Hi,

    The 750 was OC'd to 4GHz in the second chart, which is why the figure is 5FPS higher than the stock number of 68fps.

    I can update the graph in about a day with the 750 running in one of the H55 boards if you like - got the Intel JG on the test rig at present and it won't do 4G's with the 750 I suspect..lol

    regards
    Raja



  • Earballs - Monday, February 22, 2010 - link

    Ok. It might clear things up to have the 750 labeled as OC'd in the second chart. Thanks for the replies.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now