Gigabyte H57M-USB3

The H57M-USB3 hits the nail on the head for pricing at $120; let's take a look at the feature set.

Gigabyte H57M-USB3
Market Segment H55 General Use/HTPC
CPU Interface LGA-1156
CPU Support LGA-1156 i3/i5/i7 Series of Processors
Chipset Intel H55 Express Chipset
BCLK Speeds 100-600MHz in 1MHz increments
DDR3 Memory Speed 800, 1067, 1333 Frequency Ratios
QPI Frequency All supported multipier ratios available
Core Voltage 0.5V ~ 1.90V in 0.00625V increments
CPU Vdroop Compensation AUTO, Disabled and Enabled
CPU Clock Multiplier Dependant on Processor, all available multipliers supported
DRAM Voltage DDR3 Auto, 1.30V ~ 2.60V in 0.02V increments (1.50V base)
DRAM Timing Control tCL, tRCD, tRP, tRAS, + 10 Additional Timings
DRAM Command Rate Auto, 1T, 2T and 3T
PCH Voltage Auto, 0.95V ~ 1.50V in .1V ~ 0.02V increments, 1.05V Base
CPU VTT (Uncore) Voltage 1.05V ~ 1.49V in 0.05V ~ 0.02V increments
CPU PLL Voltage 1.6V ~ 2.54V in 0.1V ~ 0.02V increments, 1.80V Base
IGD VID 0.2V~1.68V in 0.05V ~ 0.012V increments
Memory Slots Four 240-pin DDR3 DIMM Slots
Dual-Channel Configuration
Regular Unbuffered DDR3 Memory to 16GB Total
Expansion Slots 1 x PCIe 2.0 x16 Slot
1 x PCIe x16 Slot (running at x4)
2 x PCI slots
Onboard SATA/RAID 5 x SATA 3.0GB/s (Support RAID 0,1,5,10, NCQ, AHCI and Hot Plug)
1 x eSATA on Rear I/O
Gigabyte SATA 2 chip: 1 x IDE, 2 x SATA 3Gb/s (RAID 0, 1 and JBOD)
Onboard USB 2.0/3.0 14 USB 2.0 ports (6) I/O Panel (one SATA combo), 8 via brackets
2 x USB 3.0 Ports (NEC D720200F1)
Onboard LAN 1 x Realtek 8111D Gigabit LAN (PCI-E x1)
Onboard Audio Realtek ALC889 - 7.1 Channel HD Audio (Dolby Home Theatre support).
Other Onboard Connectors 1 x COM, 1 x S/PDIF In, 1 x S/PDIF Out, 1 x FP Audio, 1 x FP connector, 1 x 1394, 1 x FDD
Power Connectors ATX 24-pin, 8-pin EPS 12V
I/O Panel 1 x PS/2 Keyboard/Mouse
1 x RJ45
6 x USB 2.0/1.1
2 x USB 3.0 Ports (NEC D720200F1)
1 x 1394
1 x eSATA (Intel PCH)
1 x Optical Toslink
1 x DVI-D
1 x HDMI
1 x VGA/D-sub
6 Audio I/O jacks
Fan Headers 1 CPU + 1 Additional Header (Both 4 Pin)
Fan Control Full temp/speed fan control for CPU header via OS software
No independant control for system fan header (auto controlled according to system temp)
Package Contents 2 x SATA cables, 3 x User Guides, 1 x Driver/software DVD, 1 x I/O Shield
Board/BIOS Revisions Used Board Rev: 1.0
BIOS Files Used: F2, F3a
Form Factor uATX (9.6 in. x 9.6 in.)
Warranty 3 year standard

Before we continue, it's worth a mention that the current F4 release BIOS has an issue with our PIONEER DVD drive. The board will not boot from a CD/DVD if we select AHCI mode for the SATA ports in the BIOS. This issue was also found on the H55M-USB3 motherboard but was fixed in the F4/F5 release BIOS files at our behest. It's probably a 5 minute fix for the H57 board on Gigabyte's part, but it should have been patched without request when the red flag was raised on the H55 model. In its current state, this makes installing an OS with AHCI mode active a pain. We managed to work around the problem by selecting IDE mode for our Windows 7 install and then modifying the registry after installation to enable AHCI drivers—something most users won't want to do. Gigabyte need to fix this fast.

Package contents, bundled software and board layout are identical to Gigabyte's H55M-USB3; the only real change here is the H57 chipset adding RAID support and bolstering the lowest PEG slot to x4 link width. We'll cover the differences on this page but refer you back to the H55M-USB3 section for software, board layout and BIOS overview.

Overclocking

4GB overclocking results are identical to Gigabyte's H55M-USB3 model:


8GB configurations don't fare as well however and seem to fall around 148BCLK for stability when using the 2:10 memory ratio with a QPI link frequency in the region of 3.3GHz. We're not sure on the root cause of this, but suffice it to say that the BIOS needs some work for 8GB memory configurations using the 2:10 divider. Gigabyte's H55M-USB board takes the same modules to 155BClk (DDR3-1550MHz), while ASUS' H55/H57 EVO models manage DDR3-1600 speeds using a higher QPI ratio.

Gigabyte H55M-USB3 BIOSTAR TH55XE
Comments Locked

56 Comments

View All Comments

  • Swivelguy2 - Monday, February 22, 2010 - link

    Okay, USB 2 transfers a gigbyte in 36 seconds. This is consistent with the rated spec of 480 Mbit/s. Isn't USB 3 supposed to be 10x faster? What's causing the limitation? Is it the implementation by Asus and Gigabyte (like attaching the USB 3 to too narrow of a PCI-e lane)? Is it simply the write speed limitation of the USB HDD used? If the latter, why not write to some flash memory to see if the results improve?

    C'mon Anandtech, I know you can do this right - if you're going to benchmark and discuss the USB 3 capabilities of these boards, do that!
  • Rajinder Gill - Monday, February 22, 2010 - link

    Good point. In-depth analysis of USB 3 & external HDD's etc will be offered up in a dedicated article.

    later
    Raja
  • JarredWalton - Monday, February 22, 2010 - link

    USB devices have always had some level of overhead compared to SATA devices. USB 1.1 devices never actually achieved 12Mb/s but were closer to around 8Mb/s (1MB/s) maximum. USB 2.0 is rated at 480Mbits, which translates into 57.22 MiB/s (remember that Windows uses 2^20 MiB for transfer rates instead of 10^6 MB). However, there's overhead and the maximum sustainable transfer rates on USB 2.0 tend to be closer to ~38MiB/s. At that speed, most conventional HDDs can easily saturate USB 2.0, but they're not significantly faster (i.e the fastest HDD is going to be in the realm of 100 MiB/s).

    Move to USB 3.0 and the maximum theoretical data rate is 572 MiB/s, but there's still overhead that limits performance to 4 Gb/s instead of 4.8Gb/s, and it looks like transfer rates of up to ~380MiB/s will be considered "ideal". Even the fastest SSDs aren't going to come close to 380 MiB/s right now, as they would need external enclosures and SSDs with SATA6G support.

    With USB 3.0, a 1TB HDD transferring data at around 93MB/s is very close to the speed of a 1TB drive connected via SATA, so the HDD is now the bottleneck for USB 3.0. If Raja tested with a fast SSD, we could see if USB 3.0 can get up to ~250 MB/s, but we can't test if it can achieve any better than ~43% of the theoretical throughput without SATA 6G.
  • Swivelguy2 - Wednesday, February 24, 2010 - link

    I'm sure we can come up with a way to challenge USB 3 and make sure the boards are actually performing to the spec. There are two USB 3 ports on the motherboard, how about writing large files to SSDs attached to each one? How about copying a file from one to the other? How about streaming off of a USB 3 camera or two?
  • michal1980 - Monday, February 22, 2010 - link

    Firstly, thanks for ripping into these compaines.

    Secondly; Any plans on testing any of the itx boards coming out? Zotac?

    Thridly. How come reference intel boards are never tested? It would be nice to see how intel mobo's are right out of the gate.
  • Rajinder Gill - Monday, February 22, 2010 - link

    Hi,

    1) Couple of ITX reviews are in the pipeline - including the Zotac H55 and Intel M-ITX 'Jet Geyser'. The Intel review is what I'm working on right now (board is due for release mid-march with an MSRP circa $125)

    2) We've currently got 3 Intel boards in lab due to be reviewed. The Intel 'Jet Geyser' is first. The two other boards in-lab from Intel are the P55 M-ATX and ATX models, reviews for both should be up sometime in March..

    Hope this helps..

    -Raja
  • The Wasp - Tuesday, February 23, 2010 - link

    Raja,

    Any chance you'll be reviewing the new ECS H55H-I ITX motherboard?

    How about the Giada MI-H55?

    I'm trying to pick the best 1156 ITX motherboard, so it would be great to get some more in-depth info on all of the options.

    Thanks!
    Jon
  • Rajinder Gill - Tuesday, February 23, 2010 - link

    Hi Jon,

    We're focusing on the Intel and Zotac M-ITX boards at present,so it will be a few weeks before we can look at the models you mention (will def try and add them in if possible somewhere down the line).

    regards
    Raja

  • The Wasp - Thursday, February 25, 2010 - link

    Hello again,

    I don't know if it's available, but if you could include the Jetway NC97 that would be awesome too!

    Jon
  • grazapin - Monday, February 22, 2010 - link

    Based on past experience, how do you expect the Intel boards to compare to the other manufacturers?

    Strange that Intel is only using the H57 in the Mini-ITX board and not in the larger two. Seems counterintuitive, like in many cases aren't you more likely to want the RAID features in a larger case that can hold more drives, therefore accommodating a larger motherboard also? Maybe that's just my preference or assumption.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now