NVIDIA GeForce FX 5800 Ultra: It's Here, but is it Good?
by Anand Lal Shimpi on January 27, 2003 3:50 AM EST- Posted in
- GPUs
Quick Performance Intro (AA/AF Disabled) - Continued
The only other benchmark we ran with AA/AF disabled was Serious Sam 2: The Second Encounter (Demo) using the Little Trouble benchmark. As usual we used the Extreme Quality defaults but disabled Anisotropic Filtering (we'll be saving those benchmarks for a later section).
|
Once again we see that the GeForce FX 5800 Ultra holds a small but reasonable (9%) performance advantage over the Radeon 9700 Pro.
|
The minimum frame rate numbers are a bit more reliable under Serious Sam because we can report the sustained minimum frame rates, rather than the instantaneous minimums; thus these scores are much less prone to being thrown off by minor issues that would cause significant but short drops in frame rate.
|
At higher resolutions the performance gap between the GeForce FX 5800 Ultra and the Radeon 9700 Pro is reduced instead of increased, in this case it is only 5%. This is a perfect case of ATI's raw memory bandwidth advantages outweighing any fill rate advantages that the GeForce FX has.
|
The minimum frame rates continue to be very close...
|
Finally at 1600x1200 we see that virtually all performance advantage has been erased, as the GeForce FX 5800 Ultra is barely 1% faster than the Radeon 9700 Pro in this case.
|
Now that we've gotten that out of the way, let's really stress these cards by turning on some eye-candy...
0 Comments
View All Comments